Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
It has been proven that researchers that go into their studies expecting a certain outcome, will subconsciously interpret their results in a manner that supports their bias. One of the first tenets of good research is maintaining an unbiased position throughout the research period. If she goes into this study holding the opinion that MJ is addictive, she will more than likely exit her research with the same opinion.
The Shop
Marijuana has addled your brain so much that you can't comprehend what you read any more?
She has been an addicton researcher for two decades. During that time she's received accolades for her work in alcohol addiction, depression, and treatment. Not marijuana. This research will be her (and actually the world's) first study of marijuana addiction and withdrawal using new information about what receptor in the brain is affected by marijuana use, along with a differing understanding of what withdrawal from marijuana does (since it's not as violently evident as DT's, etc.)
and once I quit eating crayons, I could become irritable, so?
Again, differentiate between physical/chemical and psychological addictions
People can become addicted to even the smallest things, look at OCD afflicted people
She has been an addicton researcher for two decades. During that time she's received accolades for her work in alcohol addiction, depression, and treatment. Not marijuana. This research will be her (and actually the world's) first study of marijuana addiction and withdrawal using new information about what receptor in the brain is affected by marijuana use, along with a differing understanding of what withdrawal from marijuana does (since it's not as violently evident as DT's, etc.)[/quote:xmi23hxm]
...And she doesn't know that the "T" in DTs stands for [i:xmi23hxm]tremens[/i:xmi23hxm]?
[quote:xmi23hxm]Atrophy of the brain and cirrhosis of the liver are long-term side effects of heavy alcohol dependence. And withdrawal for alcoholics can bring sometimes fatal delirium [color=red:xmi23hxm]tremors[/color:xmi23hxm] and convulsions.[/quote:xmi23hxm]
Credibility shot in the first paragraph..
[b:39fw1hpc]Marijuana has addled your brain so much that you can't comprehend what you read any more?[/b:39fw1hpc]
She has been an addicton researcher for two decades. During that time she's received accolades for her work in alcohol addiction, depression, and treatment. Not marijuana. This research will be her (and actually the world's) first study of marijuana addiction and withdrawal using new information about what receptor in the brain is affected by marijuana use, along with a differing understanding of what withdrawal from marijuana does (since it's not as violently evident as DT's, etc.)[/quote:39fw1hpc]
That must be it. Got any reefer?
[quote:arkbpq1t]Atrophy of the brain and cirrhosis of the liver are long-term side effects of heavy alcohol dependence. And withdrawal for alcoholics can bring sometimes fatal delirium [color=red:arkbpq1t]tremors[/color:arkbpq1t] and convulsions.[/quote:arkbpq1t]
Credibility shot in the first paragraph..[/quote:arkbpq1t]
That was not a quote of the researcher. It was the lead paragraph written by the SD news people.
and once I quit eating crayons, I could become irritable, so?
Again, differentiate between physical/chemical and psychological addictions
People can become addicted to even the smallest things, look at OCD afflicted people[/quote:2rh60jqx]
You know it all, Dave. Keep up the good work and keep thinking that the earth is flat and the hammer and chisel are better than the pen.
[quote:24i0bsq2]Atrophy of the brain and cirrhosis of the liver are long-term side effects of heavy alcohol dependence. And withdrawal for alcoholics can bring sometimes fatal delirium [color=red:24i0bsq2]tremors[/color:24i0bsq2] and convulsions.[/quote:24i0bsq2]
Credibility shot in the first paragraph..[/quote:24i0bsq2]
That was not a quote of the researcher. It was the lead paragraph written by the SD news people.[/quote:24i0bsq2]
We always have to remember that anyone can post here. Even the mentally challenged have a chance to voice an opinion here.
and once I quit eating crayons, I could become irritable, so?
Again, differentiate between physical/chemical and psychological addictions
People can become addicted to even the smallest things, look at OCD afflicted people[/quote:26fkav8g]
You know it all, Dave. Keep up the good work and keep thinking that the earth is flat and the hammer and chisel are better than the pen.[/quote:26fkav8g]
So says the full of shit wanna be who couldn't even answer some of the most BASIC questions last time
and what are your credentials again?
Oh, you have none
and what is your training again?
Oh, you have none
But you're the expert.
Least I'm not saying or pretending to be the expert, unlike you
and once I quit eating crayons, I could become irritable, so?
Again, differentiate between physical/chemical and psychological addictions
People can become addicted to even the smallest things, look at OCD afflicted people[/quote:ez4av57s]
You know it all, Dave. Keep up the good work and keep thinking that the earth is flat and the hammer and chisel are better than the pen.[/quote:ez4av57s]
So says the full of shit wanna be who couldn't even answer some of the most BASIC questions last time
and what are your credentials again?
Oh, you have none
and what is your training again?
Oh, you have none
But you're the expert.
Least I'm not saying or pretending to be the expert, unlike you[/quote:ez4av57s]
The funny thing is that I don't have to answer any of those questions asked by you. This isn't the "Dave Show". My game my rules.I have nothing to prove to you about "what I do" or "how I am qualified". Your assumptions of whatever are yours entirely. And like always, you think you are right and you're not.
Pit Row
That was not a quote of the researcher. It was the lead paragraph written by the SD news people.[/quote:1ikrc8pr]
We always have to remember that anyone can post here. Even the mentally challenged have a chance to voice an opinion here.[/quote:1ikrc8pr]
Sorry about that.
I'm pretty stoned at the moment...
Where is this "classification" you are referring to?
well you have certainly come to the right place to post then .
You tell me the differences. They are astonishing.
Weed may be harmful, but it sure as shit isnt addictive.
And we learned from the global warming thread that real scientists only regard peer reviewed journal published studies as being truth. Why should the question of whether the "psychological dependency" that is also anecdotally reported is actually a physical addiction not be studied and published?
Post a reply to: For Flarider and other Mary J addiction naysayers