Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
Are you *JUST” looking for that specific guy, and shoot him to death?
Who else?
Local cops?
National Guard?
County Sheriff?
State Police?
Who is going to be knocking on your door, that you need to kill?
Is the tyrannical President knocking on your door, and taking care of all the confiscations himself?
Idaho, before it got invaded by Californians, used to be all about freedom. Thus, my guess.
Wyoming, the least populous, most rugged free state, is next.
Idaho, all about “freedom”.
Washington, Oregon and even UTAH allow the smoking of the Devil Weed.
Idaho?
No way. No how.
Out here, we are ALL ABOUT freedom, personal choice, less government and letting people make their own decisions.
Except for those Left-Handed cigarettes.
No. “Idaho” knows what is best on that front.
The Shop
Honestly, if we’re going to have them for guns, then please by all means tag that onto one’s ability to operate a car. So many people with road rage, driving drunk after a rough day at work and too many pops at happy hour, ect.
America is in an odd spot right now with a lot of issues that need adjusting, not fixing. You don’t tear down the whole house to fix a leaking pipe.
Who performs that mental evaluation?
The “government”!
What if they start dishing out too many “Not capable of possessing firearms” decisions?
Who signs up for that job?
Who protects those evaluators from the people they have said “no” to?
I am all for the second amendment and crime is reduced when the population is armed. Urban environments excluded.
Gridlock is actually nice. It prevents massive swings in government policy. So we don’t gave massive huge vacuums and constant war for change over.
How many presidents we got now? And Not a shot fired with every one of those political changes. Can’t say the same for many totalitarian countries.
Subject change wouldn't hurt.
I realize that nothing will really change.
Thanks to the NRA, that have ensured our nation is flooded with guns, and they have worked very diligently to ensure as many people have access to them as possible.
We incarcerate more people than any other nation.
We experience a more mass shooting events than any other nation.
(4+ “points”) among our 4chan brothers.
More Americans yearly turn guns on each other than were killed on 9/11.
Yet some think is is just fine, so nothing will be done.
In my opinion, that is really the end of the story.
4chan wins, we will continue to kill each other, and we have nobody to blame other than ourselves.
Hasta.
Shifty
McCoy = M1?
The facts was that the SS was a convenient place to lay all the blame so that we could employ German soldiers into the Bundeswehr in the 50s.
After all, they had more experience fighting the USSR than anyone and we couldn't take in high ranking officers who were part of a criminal organisation.
By the way, I have no interest in your gun laws. I've come to the conclusion that unless you are culturally American you can't fully understand, just like you will never understand why we don't want them, and that it's not my place to say. I just find the clean Wehrmacht myth an extremely interesting example of the saying that history isn't what happened, its what people want you to think happened.
So you have "clips" and a "mag".
No matter what the news people call it, they'll be right with that one.
Pit Row
I'm pretty good at 400 yards with the 742.
It is also capable of shooting 240 gr. Bullets.
I have never fired one that size, and tend to hang around the 150 grain range.
The AR in .223 is what, 55 gr?
Yeah, I'll take my chances with the AR hit.
My 742 has the same rate of fire as an AR, it just doesn't make sense.
If I was 200 yards away, shooting at the crowd leaving a football game, I believe the 30.06 would win the kill game.
Mention any politician (for or against).
Mention any political party (for or against).
Someone breaks the law and kills someone driving drunk...its the drivers fault...no call to ban alcohol or punish responsible drinkers.
Someone breaks the law kills someone with a gun...its the guns fault...must ban guns and punish law abiding citizens.
It makes absolutely zero sense to me.
I'm mean the guns get so much blame for this crap why not just let the murderer off the hook...I mean, guns are the problem...it wasn't the persons fault...let him go...and lets take away all the guns so he can't do it again. (That is literally the logic I see all the time.)
Coincidentally...alcohol kills far more people than assault rifles do...yet, no calls to ban alcohol...no calls for alcohol control. Why? Why blame an inanimate object in one instance (guns) to "save lives"....but not blame another, far more deadly, inanimate object in another instance (alcohol) to "save lives"?
Hurry...someone call this out as an apples to oranges comparison...
Post a reply to: Assault weapons