Alex Jones court case

Underground Bob wrote:

Well sorry for accusing you of defending him. But it does come across that way. Maybe you should have said what you were thinking in your...

Well sorry for accusing you of defending him. But it does come across that way. Maybe you should have said what you were thinking in your first post just as you did above and there wouldn't have been any misunderstanding and getting heaped in with the usual tits that continually sprout disinformation straight from their daily brain washing podcasts that have them believing they are the smart one's for believing these crazy theories like long time stoners and will double down when proven wrong just so they don't look as stupid as they do to the greater population, but dig a bigger hole.

Jeremy A.K. wrote:

One of my downfalls is not being able to accurately put in words what my brain is thinking.

Underground Bob wrote:

Well sorry for accusing you of defending him. But it does come across that way. Maybe you should have said what you were thinking in your...

Well sorry for accusing you of defending him. But it does come across that way. Maybe you should have said what you were thinking in your first post just as you did above and there wouldn't have been any misunderstanding and getting heaped in with the usual tits that continually sprout disinformation straight from their daily brain washing podcasts that have them believing they are the smart one's for believing these crazy theories like long time stoners and will double down when proven wrong just so they don't look as stupid as they do to the greater population, but dig a bigger hole.

Piston Slap wrote:

You used three periods and a comma dude. I get you are passionate about it. I disagree with the verdict, I am pretty sure it will...

You used three periods and a comma dude.

I get you are passionate about it.

I disagree with the verdict, I am pretty sure it will be reduced.

I'm not defending him, I'm saying the verdict is outrageous and will not stand. . .

And....even if it does, folks won't see a penny.

just watch. . .

TXDirt wrote:

You haven’t read the reason why? Or you don’t agree with the reason why? You think it’s okay to slander someone, harm their reputation, tell lies...

You haven’t read the reason why? Or you don’t agree with the reason why?

You think it’s okay to slander someone, harm their reputation, tell lies about them?

That’s okay to you?

If your answer is yes, it’s okay to libel someone, please seek help.

The lies and slander Alex Jones was peddling had people calling the parents accusing them of being paid actors.

Imagine if you had buried your child, and people are calling you, harassing you, based on lies peddled from some guy down your street.

Alex Jones told lies about the parents and the dead children. Those parents incurred injury and anguish based on his lies.

What part of it don’t you understand?

Hitler never killed a single Jew, but was responsible for the deaths of millions.

Alex Jones did not call a parent and harass them, but he is responsible for thousands of harassed calls, letters, and accusations against these parents.

One person who sent a letter to Mark and Jackie Barden, whose 7-year-old son Daniel was killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, claimed to have urinated on the child’s grave. In another letter, someone threatened to dig up Daniel’s grave to prove he didn’t exist, his parents testified in Jones’ trial on Tuesday.

Do you understand or is it still unclear for you?

Jeremy A.K. wrote:

Would it be OK if he went to jail and never paid anyone a dime or is it all about money?

borg wrote:

I think you mostly have an issue with civil law or maybe don't completely understand it's purpose and function. Defamation is an actionable complaint. Civil courts...

I think you mostly have an issue with civil law or maybe don't completely understand it's purpose and function. Defamation is an actionable complaint. Civil courts don't have the same punishment options that criminal courts have. It's almost always going to be money. So yes, it's all about the money when it comes to civil court.
AJ let this go to trial and put his fate in the hands of a jury. Which means that he is just as stupid as he is slimy.

Piston Slap wrote:

You used three periods and a comma dude. I get you are passionate about it. I disagree with the verdict, I am pretty sure it will...

You used three periods and a comma dude.

I get you are passionate about it.

I disagree with the verdict, I am pretty sure it will be reduced.

I'm not defending him, I'm saying the verdict is outrageous and will not stand. . .

And....even if it does, folks won't see a penny.

just watch. . .

early wrote:

What do you think would be an appropriate penalty, if any?

Piston Slap wrote:

Well shit Early, Here we are again. :-) I'm not here to pass judgement on anyone. . . period. I have been on civil juries before...

Well shit Early,

Here we are again. :-)

I'm not here to pass judgement on anyone. . . period.

I have been on civil juries before.

I have graduated Law School. (2004) Big whoop. . .

I do not disagree that the parents were subjected to unthinkable responses. . . horrible.

I do believe MSM is also complicit in their coverage and the sensationalizing of the case.

The media worm is ravenous. . . it eats without care.... it puts true/false information out there and it's up to the reader/user to discern....

We can all be over the top about the desecration of these poor children, I can agree it's horrible.

I'm not on the jury and I'm not passing judgement.

I'm saying the verdict will not stand. . .

Thats all.

Im not uncompassionate.

TXDirt wrote:

You mean like this?

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/westboro-baptist-church-face-…

Jeremy A.K. wrote:

Would it be OK if he went to jail and never paid anyone a dime or is it all about money?

borg wrote:

I think you mostly have an issue with civil law or maybe don't completely understand it's purpose and function. Defamation is an actionable complaint. Civil courts...

I think you mostly have an issue with civil law or maybe don't completely understand it's purpose and function. Defamation is an actionable complaint. Civil courts don't have the same punishment options that criminal courts have. It's almost always going to be money. So yes, it's all about the money when it comes to civil court.
AJ let this go to trial and put his fate in the hands of a jury. Which means that he is just as stupid as he is slimy.

Piston Slap wrote:

Are you a lawyer Borg?

or did you look that shit up on the internet?

I say the latter. . . .

Piston Slap wrote:

IMO, the amount of damages is outrageous. . . . The verdict will not be over ruled. IMO the will be a reduction in damages. I...

IMO, the amount of damages is outrageous. . . .

The verdict will not be over ruled.

IMO the will be a reduction in damages.

I will admit i was wrong if it doesn't happen, readily.

Again, I agree it was horrendous what happened to the parents and children.

I'm just saying juries are quick to spend money they have no idea where it's coming from.

I've seen it multiple times in person. . .