Wold these fit on my ‘97 KX250?

FCMX
Profile picture for user FCMX
Posts
241
Joined
11/28/2013
Location
Lake Charles, LA US
FCMX
Edited Date/Time 4/5/2018 9:55am
Stock length is 124mm, and these are 126mm. I called PC to ask them but they weren’t sure. Seems like they would help the bike squat down a little better. What do you guys think?

|
mikec265
Profile picture for user mikec265
Posts
1669
Joined
10/19/2015
Location
Edinboro, PA US
mikec265 4/4/2018 7:33am
4/4/2018 7:33am
If the bolts are the same size then they would fit.
Look up both bikes on an oem parts finder like on Rocky Mountians website. cross reference the bolts.
crf250pilot
Profile picture for user crf250pilot
Posts
2080
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Manning, OR US
crf250pilot 4/4/2018 8:18am
4/4/2018 8:18am
Sorry Jeff Emig you can’t go back to 1997 even with all those trick parts.
dv12.com
Profile picture for user dv12.com
Posts
1484
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Murrieta, CA US
Fantasy
134th
dv12.com 4/4/2018 8:38am
4/4/2018 8:38am Edited Date/Time 4/4/2018 8:41am
The 1997 & 2003 OEM part numbers aren't the same stock (97: 46102-1404 & 46102-1468 for the 03) but it doesn't mean it wouldn't fit but the bolts are different too:

1997:
BOLT,ROD,12X93
92150-1337

2003:
BOLT,14MM,L=99
92153-1133

2mm is quite a bit of change if they fit. It would bring the back of your bike down by 10mm.

My guess is that the 2003 pull rod will not fit a 1997... Both rockers aren't the same either...

If you want to check it out on your own, here is the 1997 parts numbers:

https://www.kawasakipartsguy.com/oemparts/a/kaw/500b24a6f8700223e478db1…

And the 2003:

https://www.kawasakipartsguy.com/oemparts/a/kaw/500b2791f8700223e4791ff…
FCMX
Profile picture for user FCMX
Posts
241
Joined
11/28/2013
Location
Lake Charles, LA US
FCMX 4/4/2018 10:08am
4/4/2018 10:08am
crf250pilot wrote:
Sorry Jeff Emig you can’t go back to 1997 even with all those trick parts.
250pilot......oh yeah? What if I just so happen to have a time machine that no one knows about.

The Shop

See All »
FCMX
Profile picture for user FCMX
Posts
241
Joined
11/28/2013
Location
Lake Charles, LA US
FCMX 4/4/2018 10:10am
4/4/2018 10:10am
dv12.com wrote:
The 1997 & 2003 OEM part numbers aren't the same stock (97: 46102-1404 & 46102-1468 for the 03) but it doesn't mean it wouldn't fit but...
The 1997 & 2003 OEM part numbers aren't the same stock (97: 46102-1404 & 46102-1468 for the 03) but it doesn't mean it wouldn't fit but the bolts are different too:

1997:
BOLT,ROD,12X93
92150-1337

2003:
BOLT,14MM,L=99
92153-1133

2mm is quite a bit of change if they fit. It would bring the back of your bike down by 10mm.

My guess is that the 2003 pull rod will not fit a 1997... Both rockers aren't the same either...

If you want to check it out on your own, here is the 1997 parts numbers:

https://www.kawasakipartsguy.com/oemparts/a/kaw/500b24a6f8700223e478db1…

And the 2003:

https://www.kawasakipartsguy.com/oemparts/a/kaw/500b2791f8700223e4791ff…
Thanks DV, for the research. That would be a bit of a change in height.
lumpy790
Profile picture for user lumpy790
Posts
9256
Joined
9/18/2007
Location
York, SC US
lumpy790 4/4/2018 11:53am
4/4/2018 11:53am
The aftermarket KX pull rods didnt squat the rear down they jacked it up to change the geometry For better turning
Lightning78
Profile picture for user Lightning78
Posts
6313
Joined
12/12/2007
Location
Huntington Beach, CA US
Lightning78 4/4/2018 12:52pm
4/4/2018 12:52pm
lumpy790 wrote:
The aftermarket KX pull rods didnt squat the rear down they jacked it up to change the geometry For better turning
Hmmm.... That's interesting because my 03 KX250 seems to turn incredibly well and doesn't have stability problems either aside from the very rare occasionional headshake which I believe is related to suspension adjustment. The way it handled reminds me of the 1993 CR250 I had. I’ve searched and searched the Google machine and cannot seem to find ANY legitimate info on a test or review on the 2003 KX250, just 2 puff pieces on the “first impression” kawasaki had for the intro of their 2003 125 and 250 held at Washougal. The 2 i have found/read are by Transworld and Motorcycledaily.com ...... neither of which tell me any real info on the bike and i cant even find a 2003 250 shootout (when the premier class was still dominated by 250 2 strokes) from any publication thats posted online. Ive asked Tony Blazer if he could find me a link to a legitimate test a few times and he just hasnt gotten back to me and also asked Keefer if he had any info/notes on the bike but no response either. I realize the bike is kind of old by todays standards but ALL of the last generation 250 2 strokes are still very good and capable bikes for riding moto with modern frame geometry, the 48mm KYB open chamber forks arent half bad and the shock is impressive for not having a hi-speed adjuster setup. Motor is strong but very focused on the midrange only.

I had no idea anyone made a linkage for the bike to help with any kind of handling issues bec i dont notice any and LOVE the feel of that steel frame.

If anyone can post a link to a real test of the 2003 KX250 I would really appreciate it.
tempura
Profile picture for user tempura
Posts
2079
Joined
5/18/2015
Location
JP
tempura 4/4/2018 5:47pm
4/4/2018 5:47pm
The 03 was the first year of the new frame (M series) Didn't the 03 onwards have a bit of a high rear, stink bug feel compared to the previous years?
Perhaps the pro circuit parts were made to lower the rear and balance it out a bit?
The 97 on the other hand, did not suffer from that. I know the pro circuit parts for my L series KX raised the rear to give it more turn ability.
gsxr6
Profile picture for user gsxr6
Posts
1956
Joined
9/3/2011
Location
Anderson, CA US
gsxr6 4/4/2018 5:50pm
4/4/2018 5:50pm
04 is basically same bike
burn1986
Profile picture for user burn1986
Posts
9768
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA US
Fantasy
3303rd
burn1986 4/4/2018 6:45pm
4/4/2018 6:45pm Edited Date/Time 4/4/2018 6:56pm
gsxr6 wrote:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/motocrossactionmag.com/amp/mxa-2004-250-tw…
Good plain common sense shootout. The RM and YZ ruled those years. It seems like everyone else was playing catch-up. It’s funny that JS simply dominated on the KX even though MXA gave it last place. And yes, the KTM still hasn’t figured out he front fender. Cool
burn1986
Profile picture for user burn1986
Posts
9768
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA US
Fantasy
3303rd
burn1986 4/4/2018 8:05pm
4/4/2018 8:05pm
FCMX wrote:
Stock length is 124mm, and these are 126mm. I called PC to ask them but they weren’t sure. Seems like they would help the bike squat...
Stock length is 124mm, and these are 126mm. I called PC to ask them but they weren’t sure. Seems like they would help the bike squat down a little better. What do you guys think?

Kind of wanting to see pics of your 97 KX Cool
scott_nz
Profile picture for user scott_nz
Posts
5320
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NZ
Fantasy
655th
scott_nz 4/4/2018 8:19pm
4/4/2018 8:19pm
gsxr6 wrote:
04 is basically same bike
not in regards to the rear swingarm and linkage
the 04 got the new set up which did not have dog bone links like the 03 and earlier,

the bodywork and frame are the same, the swingarm and linkage are very different, the linkage on the 04 mounts through the middle of the swingarm, the the 03 mounts on the bottom,
scott_nz
Profile picture for user scott_nz
Posts
5320
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NZ
Fantasy
655th
scott_nz 4/4/2018 8:21pm
4/4/2018 8:21pm
tempura wrote:
The 03 was the first year of the new frame (M series) Didn't the 03 onwards have a bit of a high rear, stink bug feel...
The 03 was the first year of the new frame (M series) Didn't the 03 onwards have a bit of a high rear, stink bug feel compared to the previous years?
Perhaps the pro circuit parts were made to lower the rear and balance it out a bit?
The 97 on the other hand, did not suffer from that. I know the pro circuit parts for my L series KX raised the rear to give it more turn ability.
see above, the 04 changed to a new system,

the KX65 and 85 still run the same dog bone type link as was on KX125/250's 03 and before , KX65's have 4 different options of links, the shorter link raises the rear end, the longer length lowers it,
Lightning78
Profile picture for user Lightning78
Posts
6313
Joined
12/12/2007
Location
Huntington Beach, CA US
Lightning78 4/4/2018 8:27pm
4/4/2018 8:27pm
gsxr6 wrote:
04 is basically same bike
No its actually pretty different.... the frame, the linkage dogbines are anchored to the frame, the swingarm is different, the engine had some pretty decent changes too the pegs were 6mm higher as was the seat.
Lightning78
Profile picture for user Lightning78
Posts
6313
Joined
12/12/2007
Location
Huntington Beach, CA US
Lightning78 4/4/2018 8:30pm
4/4/2018 8:30pm
tempura wrote:
The 03 was the first year of the new frame (M series) Didn't the 03 onwards have a bit of a high rear, stink bug feel...
The 03 was the first year of the new frame (M series) Didn't the 03 onwards have a bit of a high rear, stink bug feel compared to the previous years?
Perhaps the pro circuit parts were made to lower the rear and balance it out a bit?
The 97 on the other hand, did not suffer from that. I know the pro circuit parts for my L series KX raised the rear to give it more turn ability.
I dont notice the stinkbug effect on my 03 the bike actually feels very neutral and balanced thats why i was wondering why there were longer linkage arms made for the 03 and since i cant find any info on it im still searching for info on the 03
Lightning78
Profile picture for user Lightning78
Posts
6313
Joined
12/12/2007
Location
Huntington Beach, CA US
Lightning78 4/4/2018 8:45pm
4/4/2018 8:45pm
Guys....check out this 1997 Kawasaki KX250 I was at my buddys house, he has a small rather asic track in his backyard and this dude shows up with this 97 in pristine condition and yes, its all original!!! What a beautiful bike it was! He saw i knew how to ride a bike pretty well so i asked him if i could ride it real quick and he flat out said NO .... I was bummed he wasnt cool with letting me take it for a spin i was telling him how cool of a bike it was and how ive been wanting ro ride one for a long time bec i had a 97 CR and he wasnt having none of it ...kinda lame i offered to lwt him ride mine even before i asked ....the real kicker is he rolled it out and never rode it or even touched it. Yes he was the original owner too.



Ted722
Profile picture for user Ted722
Posts
4486
Joined
9/21/2011
Location
Sacramento, CA US
Ted722 4/4/2018 8:57pm
4/4/2018 8:57pm
Damn, I don't remember exactly but for sure I ran shorter PC pull rods on my '98 and '01...and I think I had them on my '94. Liked my '98 with them (bike turned better) and fine tuned the balance with high speed on the shock and fork height. Over the years, backing out on high speed (start with 2 turns out) has been a good direction to go for me. Stayed lower and planted coming out of the corners, while not putting too much weight bias on the front coming into corners.

Pit Row

See All »
wildbill
Profile picture for user wildbill
Posts
4358
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Christmas Valley, OR US
wildbill 4/4/2018 9:41pm
4/4/2018 9:41pm
Lightning78 wrote:
Guys....check out this 1997 Kawasaki KX250 I was at my buddys house, he has a small rather asic track in his backyard and this dude shows...
Guys....check out this 1997 Kawasaki KX250 I was at my buddys house, he has a small rather asic track in his backyard and this dude shows up with this 97 in pristine condition and yes, its all original!!! What a beautiful bike it was! He saw i knew how to ride a bike pretty well so i asked him if i could ride it real quick and he flat out said NO .... I was bummed he wasnt cool with letting me take it for a spin i was telling him how cool of a bike it was and how ive been wanting ro ride one for a long time bec i had a 97 CR and he wasnt having none of it ...kinda lame i offered to lwt him ride mine even before i asked ....the real kicker is he rolled it out and never rode it or even touched it. Yes he was the original owner too.



My 97 KX 250 might be my most favorite bike ever. The motors were great with a low to mid hit that loved to be short shifted. Great holeshot grabber. You would've loved riding that thing.
Lightning78
Profile picture for user Lightning78
Posts
6313
Joined
12/12/2007
Location
Huntington Beach, CA US
Lightning78 4/4/2018 9:46pm
4/4/2018 9:46pm
Lightning78 wrote:
Guys....check out this 1997 Kawasaki KX250 I was at my buddys house, he has a small rather asic track in his backyard and this dude shows...
Guys....check out this 1997 Kawasaki KX250 I was at my buddys house, he has a small rather asic track in his backyard and this dude shows up with this 97 in pristine condition and yes, its all original!!! What a beautiful bike it was! He saw i knew how to ride a bike pretty well so i asked him if i could ride it real quick and he flat out said NO .... I was bummed he wasnt cool with letting me take it for a spin i was telling him how cool of a bike it was and how ive been wanting ro ride one for a long time bec i had a 97 CR and he wasnt having none of it ...kinda lame i offered to lwt him ride mine even before i asked ....the real kicker is he rolled it out and never rode it or even touched it. Yes he was the original owner too.



wildbill wrote:
My 97 KX 250 might be my most favorite bike ever. The motors were great with a low to mid hit that loved to be short...
My 97 KX 250 might be my most favorite bike ever. The motors were great with a low to mid hit that loved to be short shifted. Great holeshot grabber. You would've loved riding that thing.
I know all about how good it was my buddy had one and bought it the same time this dude did amd he always raved about it...i was really excited to ride it and was perplexed when the guy flat ass said no ....not like i felt i had a right to ride it but im no beginner and figured he wouldnt have a problem letting me take it for a spin
wildbill
Profile picture for user wildbill
Posts
4358
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Christmas Valley, OR US
wildbill 4/4/2018 10:04pm
4/4/2018 10:04pm
Fuck, I'd of let you race mine. They're just bikes. The 98's were also amazing. Suspension on both years was a bit suspect but the motors were the shit. I can see why Emig nailed an SX Championship.
FCMX
Profile picture for user FCMX
Posts
241
Joined
11/28/2013
Location
Lake Charles, LA US
FCMX 4/5/2018 4:41am
4/5/2018 4:41am
FCMX wrote:
Stock length is 124mm, and these are 126mm. I called PC to ask them but they weren’t sure. Seems like they would help the bike squat...
Stock length is 124mm, and these are 126mm. I called PC to ask them but they weren’t sure. Seems like they would help the bike squat down a little better. What do you guys think?

burn1986 wrote:
Kind of wanting to see pics of your 97 KX Cool


dl117
Profile picture for user dl117
Posts
1549
Joined
2/8/2007
Location
Cambridge, MN US
Fantasy
2577th
dl117 4/5/2018 8:15am
4/5/2018 8:15am
FCMX wrote:
[img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2018/04/05/253630/s1200_C0D0D9B0_AD2B_4861_A83A_5940CE6578B0.jpg[/img]


Jesus that is sweet
FCMX
Profile picture for user FCMX
Posts
241
Joined
11/28/2013
Location
Lake Charles, LA US
FCMX 4/5/2018 9:55am
4/5/2018 9:55am
Thanks. I’ll post more pics in the build section.

Post a reply to: Wold these fit on my ‘97 KX250?