Posts
255
Joined
9/11/2018
Location
Chula Vista, CA
US
I'm mostly intrigued to get some insight/opinion on this due to some comments on IG and FB from posts on Transworld, Racer X, MXA, etc. but I've seen it here and on there on this forum a few times so I ask... what's up with people saying top ten guys don't deserve factory rides?
I'll put it this way: there are four Japanese manufacturers and two Euro manufacturers who put up a serious factory effort, especially in the 450 class. They all have two, sometimes three, riders in the premier class. This means we are looking at 12+ factory backed contenders fighting for the top spot.
For obvious reasons, they can't all win, or podium, or top five or even top ten.
So why say a top ten guy doesn't deserve that ride?
We aren't even talking about the massive backing you get from the factory satellite teams or even the big hitter privateer teams in this.
Imo, I think top ten guys deserve every bit of support and backing that the industry has to offer but some don't see it that way.
You even see teams like RB KTM and Pro Circuit (granted PC is 250 class but same ideal applies) that will cut a top ten guy who doesn't get on the podium. And I get it, you're in it to win it.
But with the teams and talent that are all out there, not everyone is going to achieve that. So why say someone shouldn't be in that position when they are the top ten of the cream of the crop?
Just some random thought I'd love to hear a discussion on.
Thoughts everyone?
I'll put it this way: there are four Japanese manufacturers and two Euro manufacturers who put up a serious factory effort, especially in the 450 class. They all have two, sometimes three, riders in the premier class. This means we are looking at 12+ factory backed contenders fighting for the top spot.
For obvious reasons, they can't all win, or podium, or top five or even top ten.
So why say a top ten guy doesn't deserve that ride?
We aren't even talking about the massive backing you get from the factory satellite teams or even the big hitter privateer teams in this.
Imo, I think top ten guys deserve every bit of support and backing that the industry has to offer but some don't see it that way.
You even see teams like RB KTM and Pro Circuit (granted PC is 250 class but same ideal applies) that will cut a top ten guy who doesn't get on the podium. And I get it, you're in it to win it.
But with the teams and talent that are all out there, not everyone is going to achieve that. So why say someone shouldn't be in that position when they are the top ten of the cream of the crop?
Just some random thought I'd love to hear a discussion on.
Thoughts everyone?
Stop.
That is your answer right there.
The Shop
While it may be the platform some riders need to reach a top 10 level, it's ludicrous how they think that proven factory riders should be kicked to the curb and give some 25th place privateer the support and equipment while a proven top 10 contender has to ride lesser equipment.
Granted it's social media, but public forum is public forum and I see it every where.
Some of the best racing I see in the 450s is 3rd to 6th.
There is so much more to this than just winning or losing. A guy like Reed, who is a multi-time champion has such a huge following... he put butts in seats and provides exactly what outside the industry sponsors are looking for... EXPOSURE. I mean, winning is great, but do more people around the world know Eli Tomac and Jason Anderson or James Stewart and Chad Reed.
Name a hockey player... or soccer player... or tennis star. My guess is you've named someone established and most likely beyond their prime. Sydney Crosby, as great as he is, is past his prime... same with Ovechkin. That said, I'm not sure I could name any of the current, up and coming NHL guys.
Post a reply to: Why the "hate" on top ten guys?