Posts
938
Joined
5/1/2008
Location
Tamaqua, PA
US
Edited Date/Time
1/26/2012 7:39am
Was it the fact that there was too much extra power? Would people buy them now if they were in production and up to date?
This is a real question so please don't turn this into a 2 vs 4 thread. I'm not saying they should come back, I'm just wondering what killed them.
This is a real question so please don't turn this into a 2 vs 4 thread. I'm not saying they should come back, I'm just wondering what killed them.
As far as amateur- way too much power for the average rider.
The Shop
As the bikes became more powerful they became more difficult to ride. The buying public found that they could go faster on a 250 so that's what they bought.
Fewer 500s were hence being sold so less money was invested in updating them. The factories then became less interested in promoting them (hence the dropping of the class in the US).
It was exponential. As less 500s were sold so less development happened....so they became more outdated....and sold even less....so even less development.... etc
We're maybe starting to seeing it happen all over again with 450Fs?
If the KTM350 succeeds at being the perfect bike and the big 4 follows suit you can probably see some of the same with the 450's. Unlike KTM, the Japanese mfgs. don't seem too concerned with giving the moto public what they want, more like what the mfgs. want you to need.
1. Not all manufacturers made a 500
2. Many Pro riders were focussing on a specific class and did not ride open class
3. Sanctioning bodies were trying to tighten up programs.. Something had to go
4. Lack of development made people look at the 250 class as the Premier class
5. MC never raced one in SX
... yep thats it... I blame Jeremy
Or maybe it was Danny Dolan? Conspiracy???
500's where hard to ride, had more motor than the frame at the time could handle, had light switch motors that would hit like a ton of bricks, and where extremely niche in a sport that was already niche. Consumer demand for them was VERY low.
then the manufacturers, namely Suzuki first, stopped building them because they werent selling them. Yamaha had the 490, but it went 5 or 7 years without any developement because interest was low. People bought 250's and 125's in droves. Us, we did it.
Pit Row
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
It's exactly the same thing as the 250T/250F controversy - the manufacturers don't want to keep making 250Ts, so they don't want to see them raced in pro series' and they don't want to really update them very much, and they'll die off in the same way. It's not because they're bad bikes - in fact, a 250T is probably the best all-around motocross bike ever for the vast majority of riders - it's just because the factories are run by businessmen and not motorcycle enthusiasts (KTM aside). Businessmen say, "Why make two bikes for the same class? We'll reduce production expense by making only one, and we'll have the same number of customers. Two bikes for one class is crazy, shut that assembly line down right now." The racing series' gave the factories what they wanted, and the only ones to suffer were people who wanted to race a 250T because it was lighter, more powerful, more reliable, better handling, more developed, better sounding, better smelling and cheaper to ride. But who cares about any of that stuff?
It was a cop in Mexico...Baja, to be more specific, that drove the final nail.
June, 03, 1995.
The older 500's were pipey and violent. They tamed them down and turned them into torque monsters in later years. Very easy to ride and really fast. I would own a Service Honda (In an RMZ250 chassis thank you) if I could afford one.
It took a long time for racing departments to really get a grip on detuning a bike to make it faster to ride on the track.
Post a reply to: What killed the 500?