What killed the 500?

3D
Posts
938
Joined
5/1/2008
Location
Tamaqua, PA US
Edited Date/Time 1/26/2012 7:39am
Was it the fact that there was too much extra power? Would people buy them now if they were in production and up to date?
This is a real question so please don't turn this into a 2 vs 4 thread. I'm not saying they should come back, I'm just wondering what killed them.
|
FreshTopEnd
Posts
12476
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA US
Fantasy
4231st
11/13/2009 7:49am
It cost teams too much to run three different series.
pitbike502
Posts
4511
Joined
12/26/2007
Location
Syracuse, NY US
11/13/2009 7:51am
mike larocco killed the 500 with his awesomeness Cool
3D
Posts
938
Joined
5/1/2008
Location
Tamaqua, PA US
11/13/2009 7:54am
It cost teams too much to run three different series.
That seems logical.
11/13/2009 7:56am
As far as pro racing-- I don't think the 500s were hugely popular with a lot of fans. (I liked them). They sounded mellower.

As far as amateur- way too much power for the average rider.

The Shop

Maber
Posts
90
Joined
10/1/2008
Location
HM
11/13/2009 8:02am
Open bikes were 360-400cc. Factory open bikes became bigger to take full advantage of the 500cc upper limit. The public wanted bikes that were factory replicas so production bikes got bigger and more powerful too.

As the bikes became more powerful they became more difficult to ride. The buying public found that they could go faster on a 250 so that's what they bought.

Fewer 500s were hence being sold so less money was invested in updating them. The factories then became less interested in promoting them (hence the dropping of the class in the US).

It was exponential. As less 500s were sold so less development happened....so they became more outdated....and sold even less....so even less development.... etc

We're maybe starting to seeing it happen all over again with 450Fs?


flynbrian
Posts
358
Joined
7/16/2008
Location
Geff, IL US
11/13/2009 8:07am
Not many people could ride them. Just a little too much power for the average joe and with the weight and handling issues back then it would make your butt pucker in a hurry. However stick a 500cc 2-stroke engine in a modern day 450 and I bet they would sell.
G-man
Posts
8077
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ US
11/13/2009 8:12am
Yamaha killed them when they stopped updating them and soon the others followed suit.
DownSouth
Posts
9634
Joined
7/5/2008
Location
Tallapoosa, GA US
11/13/2009 8:19am
G-man wrote:
Yamaha killed them when they stopped updating them and soon the others followed suit.
Suzuki gave up on the 500 way before Yamaha did.
newmann
Posts
24444
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
11/13/2009 8:29am
Service Honda seems to sell quite a few. Could be because it's a specialty thing to an extent. If it was offered as a production bike, I doubt it would have nearly as much appeal.

If the KTM350 succeeds at being the perfect bike and the big 4 follows suit you can probably see some of the same with the 450's. Unlike KTM, the Japanese mfgs. don't seem too concerned with giving the moto public what they want, more like what the mfgs. want you to need.
ebers
Posts
903
Joined
8/21/2008
Location
western, NY US
Fantasy
174th
11/13/2009 8:47am
Wait, the 500 is dead?
FreshTopEnd
Posts
12476
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA US
Fantasy
4231st
11/13/2009 8:50am
I think the manufacturers sold every 500 they made. But they don't make money selling dirt bikes I guess.

AMA714
Posts
781
Joined
12/27/2007
Location
San Antonio, TX US
11/13/2009 8:55am
There are so many things that happened that you cant count just 1 thing as the demise of the open class.

1. Not all manufacturers made a 500
2. Many Pro riders were focussing on a specific class and did not ride open class
3. Sanctioning bodies were trying to tighten up programs.. Something had to go
4. Lack of development made people look at the 250 class as the Premier class
5. MC never raced one in SX

... yep thats it... I blame Jeremy
3D
Posts
938
Joined
5/1/2008
Location
Tamaqua, PA US
11/13/2009 9:12am
AMA714 wrote:
There are so many things that happened that you cant count just 1 thing as the demise of the open class. 1. Not all manufacturers made...
There are so many things that happened that you cant count just 1 thing as the demise of the open class.

1. Not all manufacturers made a 500
2. Many Pro riders were focussing on a specific class and did not ride open class
3. Sanctioning bodies were trying to tighten up programs.. Something had to go
4. Lack of development made people look at the 250 class as the Premier class
5. MC never raced one in SX

... yep thats it... I blame Jeremy
So Jeremy started the SX only deal and killed the 500. What a jerk! Smile
The Rock
Posts
8763
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI US
11/13/2009 9:14am
The smoking gun leads to Wedge Figgus........
petegrath
Posts
1112
Joined
5/18/2009
Location
John's Island, SC US
11/13/2009 9:37am
Heh heh heh... His mom didn't like the sound of them.

Or maybe it was Danny Dolan? Conspiracy???
Gunsdad
Posts
65
Joined
1/8/2009
Location
Cave In, OK US
11/13/2009 9:39am
The AMA....no class, therefore no machines.
11/13/2009 9:59am
what killed the 500 is the same thing that killed the 2 stroke..... us, the consumer. period. you can blame the AMA, but thats like blaming the government for the buggy whip industry collapsing when cars hit the scene. there was no class for them because 2 of the 4 manufacturers stopped making them basically and the other 2 had quit developing them and just bold new graphic'ed them for 5 years. The consumer interest wasnt there, so the manufacturers stopped.

500's where hard to ride, had more motor than the frame at the time could handle, had light switch motors that would hit like a ton of bricks, and where extremely niche in a sport that was already niche. Consumer demand for them was VERY low.

then the manufacturers, namely Suzuki first, stopped building them because they werent selling them. Yamaha had the 490, but it went 5 or 7 years without any developement because interest was low. People bought 250's and 125's in droves. Us, we did it.
newmann
Posts
24444
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
11/13/2009 10:06am
Really not much different from the current 2 stroke market in general. The mfgs. stop all development of them and when people quit buying a seven year old new bike they quit producing it altogether. And that is not a 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke comment.
GuyB
Posts
35699
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
Fantasy
988th
11/13/2009 10:11am
I think the manufacturers sold every 500 they made. But they don't make money selling dirt bikes I guess.

But I'd guess a lot of them ended up with paddle tires and flags, so they could go to Glamis.
Kinetic1
Posts
2796
Joined
6/4/2009
Location
Gun Lake, MI US
11/13/2009 10:16am
I had an 87 500 Honda that I hated because of the spikey power. I rode a 91 and it was so much more mellow it felt slow but was fast. Kinda like a 450 four stroke...... go figure.
AMA714
Posts
781
Joined
12/27/2007
Location
San Antonio, TX US
11/13/2009 10:17am
Sweeeet bike brah

BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
TX US
11/13/2009 10:23am
It's a chicken and egg argument. Yamaha and Suzuki didn't make a competitive open class bike, so they pushed to get the class eliminated. Honda and Kawasaki didn't make enough of a fuss because it cost money to race that class and they figured the fewer models they made, the more profit they made - so basically development of the 500s stopped in '93 or so. People don't buy bikes that the pros don't ride and that the factory doesn't update, so they just went away. There was never anything inherent in a 500 that was bad or unmanageable or any of that - many riders preferred them to 250s, others had the opposite point of view. But they were, and still are, very easy bikes to ride and as reliable as a rock.

It's exactly the same thing as the 250T/250F controversy - the manufacturers don't want to keep making 250Ts, so they don't want to see them raced in pro series' and they don't want to really update them very much, and they'll die off in the same way. It's not because they're bad bikes - in fact, a 250T is probably the best all-around motocross bike ever for the vast majority of riders - it's just because the factories are run by businessmen and not motorcycle enthusiasts (KTM aside). Businessmen say, "Why make two bikes for the same class? We'll reduce production expense by making only one, and we'll have the same number of customers. Two bikes for one class is crazy, shut that assembly line down right now." The racing series' gave the factories what they wanted, and the only ones to suffer were people who wanted to race a 250T because it was lighter, more powerful, more reliable, better handling, more developed, better sounding, better smelling and cheaper to ride. But who cares about any of that stuff?
avidchimp
Posts
4550
Joined
7/9/2008
Location
Thousand Oaks, CA US
Fantasy
1182nd
11/13/2009 10:35am
I think the manufacturers sold every 500 they made. But they don't make money selling dirt bikes I guess.

GuyB wrote:
But I'd guess a lot of them ended up with paddle tires and flags, so they could go to Glamis.
Uh, yeah. That is about all they were good for to us mere mortals...
ebers
Posts
903
Joined
8/21/2008
Location
western, NY US
Fantasy
174th
11/13/2009 10:42am
avidchimp wrote:
Uh, yeah. That is about all they were good for to us mere mortals...
Not so! I race in the tight Northeast woods and even as of last year I won a race on my old steel framed KX500! I love the thing, its an animal! But yes, I don't race it normally, although this winter I am racing some Mud-n-Snow Scrambles with it, no where I can't go with my trusty 500..
TeamGreen
Posts
28971
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
11/13/2009 10:42am
The final nail in the coffin of Japanese 500s?

It was a cop in Mexico...Baja, to be more specific, that drove the final nail.

June, 03, 1995.
Kinetic1
Posts
2796
Joined
6/4/2009
Location
Gun Lake, MI US
11/13/2009 10:45am
I think the manufacturers sold every 500 they made. But they don't make money selling dirt bikes I guess.

GuyB wrote:
But I'd guess a lot of them ended up with paddle tires and flags, so they could go to Glamis.
avidchimp wrote:
Uh, yeah. That is about all they were good for to us mere mortals...
Yet you probably love your 450 right?

The older 500's were pipey and violent. They tamed them down and turned them into torque monsters in later years. Very easy to ride and really fast. I would own a Service Honda (In an RMZ250 chassis thank you) if I could afford one.
Bigfoot
Posts
1197
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
UT US
11/13/2009 11:13am
One of the most fun and easiest bikes to ride I ever threw a leg over was a friend's '86 CR500 that had a balanced crank (very little vibration for a 500) and a big ol' flywheel weight. Put it in 3rd and chug around just about anything. Mellow power delivery and stump-pulling power, much like what you'd find in a modern 4-stroke, only cheaper, more reliable, lighter, easier to work on....
WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
TX US
11/13/2009 11:21am
GuyB wrote:
But I'd guess a lot of them ended up with paddle tires and flags, so they could go to Glamis.
avidchimp wrote:
Uh, yeah. That is about all they were good for to us mere mortals...
Kinetic1 wrote:
Yet you probably love your 450 right? The older 500's were pipey and violent. They tamed them down and turned them into torque monsters in later...
Yet you probably love your 450 right?

The older 500's were pipey and violent. They tamed them down and turned them into torque monsters in later years. Very easy to ride and really fast. I would own a Service Honda (In an RMZ250 chassis thank you) if I could afford one.
I ran into one of the real old-school factory 500 riders at the Houston SX one year, and he told me that he got a new bike from the factory (he was a mid-late 80s factory guy) and when he went out and rode it, it was just impossible to ride for 45 minutes. Much too powerful and sudden, couldn't get any traction and was just ridiculous. So his mechanic took it apart, welded up ports, put tungsten plugs in the crank to add weight, and generally detuned it until he could ride it fast for 45 minutes. Then they sent all the specs and particulars to the factory so they'd know what kind of engine they needed to build in 500s. They said, "Thanks so much, we really appreciate the feedback, we'll incorporate these changes immediately." He wore that bike out and the factory sent another one, and it was faster than the previous one had been before they did anything to it.

It took a long time for racing departments to really get a grip on detuning a bike to make it faster to ride on the track.

Post a reply to: What killed the 500?

The Latest