What do think is better for the sport?

aeffertz
Posts
9275
Joined
7/16/2015
Location
Eau Claire, WI US
Edited Date/Time 10/18/2018 10:31pm
Poll

What do think is better for the sport?

Choices
|
Motofinne
Posts
10686
Joined
1/4/2014
Location
FI
10/18/2018 1:23pm
What do you mean by "the sport"?

The professional side of it? SX? MX? Weekend warriors at local tracks (that is the sport in my mind)?

I think lower speeds is always better, especially from an injury side of things.
yz133rider
Posts
4467
Joined
8/1/2013
Location
Avondale, PA US
10/18/2018 1:24pm
More room for error. Less do perfectly within half an inch or die obstacles.
1

The Shop

peltier626
Posts
1401
Joined
3/15/2018
Location
LA US
10/18/2018 1:25pm Edited Date/Time 10/18/2018 1:25pm
Slower speeds would result in less severe injuries and might tighten up racing.
1
yz133rider
Posts
4467
Joined
8/1/2013
Location
Avondale, PA US
10/18/2018 1:32pm
peltier626 wrote:
Slower speeds would result in less severe injuries and might tighten up racing.
Unless we mean every inch of the track littered with massively steep and tricky jumps with no margin for error
1
chump6784
Posts
1691
Joined
5/9/2011
Location
AU
10/18/2018 1:34pm
Higher speed, less technicality is great for supercross to draw the non riding fan. Watching a bike go 60mph over 100 foot triples makes much better viewing, especially for those who don't understand or appreciate the slower, more technical sections. The downside is when things go wrong the go wrong big.

I'd say slower, more technical tracks are better for rider health which in turn will help participation at all ages but particularly the junior levels. Less patents will let their kids ride when people are constantly getting carted off the track with severe injuries.
I guess it depends if you want to grow the sport through spectators or competitors
1
10/18/2018 6:18pm Edited Date/Time 10/18/2018 6:19pm
What tha !!!! Slower speed?!!! Go ride trials if you want slower speeds; technical & fast my man. :-)

I have a CR500 and I like using top gear.
3
APLMAN99
Posts
10098
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Dallas, TX US
10/18/2018 7:11pm
If you're talking about outdoors, how about no dozers, no powered equipment to make the track at all, and the only real track building tools are the hammers to drive in the track markers.........?

Some tracks would be fast, some slow.
3
BikeGuy321
Posts
427
Joined
9/25/2018
Location
San Jose, CA US
10/18/2018 8:27pm
At least for Supercross, I'd say higher speeds and less technical. Technical tracks spread the field out too much and make for less competitive racing.
1
kb228
Posts
6161
Joined
1/31/2018
Location
Mansfield, OH US
10/18/2018 8:34pm Edited Date/Time 10/18/2018 8:34pm
The poll results are backwards. Sx is slower and more technical and people get hurt. Moto is faster and less technical. But everyone votes that SX is better, yet posts on vital that MX is better. Idk........
2
Ewan49
Posts
200
Joined
8/21/2018
Location
AU
10/18/2018 8:39pm
APLMAN99 wrote:
If you're talking about outdoors, how about no dozers, no powered equipment to make the track at all, and the only real track building tools are...
If you're talking about outdoors, how about no dozers, no powered equipment to make the track at all, and the only real track building tools are the hammers to drive in the track markers.........?

Some tracks would be fast, some slow.
That's called Enduro!!
zehn
Posts
7258
Joined
1/15/2013
Location
Anchorage, AK US
10/18/2018 8:54pm
APLMAN99 wrote:
If you're talking about outdoors, how about no dozers, no powered equipment to make the track at all, and the only real track building tools are...
If you're talking about outdoors, how about no dozers, no powered equipment to make the track at all, and the only real track building tools are the hammers to drive in the track markers.........?

Some tracks would be fast, some slow.
You might be interested in woods racing. This is an MX forum.
1
SwingHard
Posts
485
Joined
3/14/2017
Location
Sacramento, CA US
10/18/2018 9:13pm
Great question! It will be interesting to hear the different definitions of technicality on a track.
From my experience a faster track usually turns into a rougher track,bigger breaking bumps,sharper square edge etc.
Doddy
Posts
773
Joined
12/28/2017
Location
Everett, WA US
10/18/2018 9:36pm
I voted for the 2 stroke option.
1
APLMAN99
Posts
10098
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Dallas, TX US
10/18/2018 9:42pm
APLMAN99 wrote:
If you're talking about outdoors, how about no dozers, no powered equipment to make the track at all, and the only real track building tools are...
If you're talking about outdoors, how about no dozers, no powered equipment to make the track at all, and the only real track building tools are the hammers to drive in the track markers.........?

Some tracks would be fast, some slow.
zehn wrote:
You might be interested in woods racing. This is an MX forum.
And I prefer the more original MX, but maybe some of you younger guys just don't understand how awesome it was......












3
2
zehn
Posts
7258
Joined
1/15/2013
Location
Anchorage, AK US
10/18/2018 9:45pm Edited Date/Time 10/18/2018 9:46pm
I’ve done vintage racing on a Metisse, pretty sure I know what moto “used” to be
1
APLMAN99
Posts
10098
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Dallas, TX US
10/18/2018 9:57pm
zehn wrote:
I’ve done vintage racing on a Metisse, pretty sure I know what moto “used” to be
If you do, then your earlier response was a bit silly. Some of us are old enough to have been racing on those machines before they were considered vintage........

(Though I've never personally raced, or even rode, a Metisse).
10/18/2018 10:31pm
I think for both pro and weekend warrior level it should be lower speed more technical riding. I think the biggest deterrent for people getting into moto is injuries. The less people get hurt, the more people will ride, IMO

Post a reply to: What do think is better for the sport?

The Latest