Toronto Sx practice discussion thread

Related:
Create New Tag

3/24/2012 11:07 AM
Edited Date/Time: 3/24/2012 2:31 PM

Q1 250 group A
[LINK TO IMAGE]

Q2 250 group A
[LINK TO IMAGE]


Q1 250 group B
[LINK TO IMAGE]

Q2 250 group B
[LINK TO IMAGE]


Q1 250 group C
[LINK TO IMAGE]

Q2 250 group C
[LINK TO IMAGE]

250 Qualifying Overall
[LINK TO IMAGE]







Q1 450 group A
[LINK TO IMAGE]

Q2 450 group A
[LINK TO IMAGE]


Q1 450 group B
[LINK TO IMAGE]

Q2 450 group B
[LINK TO IMAGE]


Q1 450 group C
[LINK TO IMAGE]

Q2 450 group C
[LINK TO IMAGE]


450 Qualifying Overall
[LINK TO IMAGE]

|

3/24/2012 11:09 AM

It could be sub-45 seconds for the 450's!

|

3/24/2012 11:12 AM

The track is too short, they should add laps to the heats and finals.

|

“Adhering to 1970’s Standards of Political Correctness”

3/24/2012 11:13 AM

Where's Scottie?

|

The smoothest racer to ever throw a leg over a Motocross bike ... Jean Michel Bayle.

3/24/2012 11:14 AM

Franklin Bluth wrote:

Where's Scottie?

Sleeping. He was up all night watching F1.

|

3/24/2012 11:17 AM
Edited Date/Time: 3/24/2012 12:07 PM

250 group B 1
[LINK TO IMAGE]





250 group c 1
[LINK TO IMAGE]

|

3/24/2012 11:18 AM

SX is not an endurance event. Nothing wrong with 12 minute mains. This is not the outdoor nasty's gentlemen. This is the show that pays the bills for the season for the teams. We need both.

|

3/24/2012 11:18 AM

man, this F1 season is rough on our boy scottie this year. w00t

|

3/24/2012 11:18 AM

ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule ASAP

|

3/24/2012 11:18 AM

Franklin Bluth wrote:

Where's Scottie?

kongols wrote:

Sleeping. He was up all night watching F1.

Ahhhh thanks for the info ... I was up watching the Lakers!

Predictions for lap times?

I'm going with 44.8 ...

|

The smoothest racer to ever throw a leg over a Motocross bike ... Jean Michel Bayle.

3/24/2012 11:19 AM

Mstock wrote:

SX is not an endurance event. Nothing wrong with 12 minute mains. This is not the outdoor nasty's gentlemen. This is the show ...more

Supercross is a product and we are the consumers. We want our monies worth.

|

“Adhering to 1970’s Standards of Political Correctness”

3/24/2012 11:21 AM

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo

Reply
Retweet
Favorite
· Open

Lil stew looks focused and fast making everyone look average at best in the whoops.

|

3/24/2012 11:23 AM

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo

Reply
Retweet
Favorite
· Open

And lil stews down in the whoops..

|

3/24/2012 11:23 AM

Roczen must really not be feeling well...

|

3/24/2012 11:26 AM

Bowers!

|

3/24/2012 11:28 AM

250 group A 1
[LINK TO IMAGE]

|

3/24/2012 11:28 AM

sbarrington314 wrote:

ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a ...more

Please educate me on the 107 rule...

|

3/24/2012 11:32 AM

sbarrington314 wrote:

ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a ...more

MX Sports Medicine wrote:

Please educate me on the 107 rule...

not sure on that part of it. but if youve ever seen group c practice, youd get the first part. its scary.

|

3/24/2012 11:33 AM

sbarrington314 wrote:

ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a ...more

MX Sports Medicine wrote:

Please educate me on the 107 rule...

He is saying that there should be a time difference rule that if you are not with in a specified time, aprox 3.5 seconds of the fast time than the rider is a hazard to himself and the rest of the riders.... I fully agree.

|

3/24/2012 11:34 AM

sbarrington314 wrote:

ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a ...more

MX Sports Medicine wrote:

Please educate me on the 107 rule...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/107%25_rule

|

3/24/2012 11:35 AM

Weimer is on it ...

|

The smoothest racer to ever throw a leg over a Motocross bike ... Jean Michel Bayle.

3/24/2012 11:37 AM

sbarrington314 wrote:

ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a ...more

MX Sports Medicine wrote:

Please educate me on the 107 rule...

Good info!

|

3/24/2012 11:38 AM

sbarrington314 wrote:

ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a ...more

MX Sports Medicine wrote:

Please educate me on the 107 rule...

ok i will bite if the fastest lap is 50 sec then 107% . SO 50 X 107/100 ( times 107 divided by 100)=53.5 sec (very tight) unsure

|

3/24/2012 11:38 AM

sbarrington314 wrote:

ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a ...more

MX Sports Medicine wrote:

Please educate me on the 107 rule...

Thanks Buddy!

|

3/24/2012 11:38 AM

Windham to the top!

|

3/24/2012 11:39 AM

Fuck yeah !!!

|

3/24/2012 11:39 AM
Edited Date/Time: 3/24/2012 11:40 AM

sbarrington314 wrote:

ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a ...more

MX Sports Medicine wrote:

Please educate me on the 107 rule...

f1 rule. During the first phase of qualifying, any driver who fails to set a lap within 107 percent of the fastest time in the first qualifying session will not be allowed to start the race.

edit: everyone beat me to it. thats what i get for not refreshing.

|

3/24/2012 11:41 AM

450 group A 1
[LINK TO IMAGE]

|

3/24/2012 11:47 AM

so if my math is correct, if a 107% rule were in effect, anyone slower than a 51.399 would be out.

|

3/24/2012 11:47 AM

Mstock wrote:

SX is not an endurance event. Nothing wrong with 12 minute mains. This is not the outdoor nasty's gentlemen. This is the show ...more

Reese95w wrote:

Supercross is a product and we are the consumers. We want our monies worth.

How much cash green money did you pay for this season? Zero? Hope you work for free. Nothing wrong with that. It's the american way.

|