Posts
794
Joined
7/28/2014
Location
Gretna, NE
US
Fantasy
3669th
What does everyone make of Tickle being at Glen Helen...?
I think a guilty man would be in hiding...I hope he isn’t guilty, I don’t really think he is...
Just curious what everyone else thought
I think a guilty man would be in hiding...I hope he isn’t guilty, I don’t really think he is...
Just curious what everyone else thought
2+2=4
The Shop
Such a bummer to see such a talented (and injury-free) guy sitting on the sidelines.
Broc was tested at San Diego, I would think if he was purposely taking a banned drug he would stop. Knowing they would be taking a sample b later? When was sample b taken?
The old man says, "What?"
So the doctor says it again.
Once again the old man says, "what?"
So the doctor yells it, "I NEED A URINE SAMPLE, A STOOL SAMPLE, AND A BLOOD SAMPLE!"
With that the man's wife turns to him and says, "He needs a pair of your underwear!"
Indeed if a rider takes 4 years for something that is not helping him on the track, then why not racing much longer the 250 SX fully loaded and win a couple millions along the way ?
A reasonable sanction is really important to obtain otherwise with the currently technology the sport may become more dirty than it has ever been.
Pit Row
Supercross has the AMA and the FIM so another promoter can't show up tomorrow with either one of those sanctioning bodies and try to do their own series, an effective monopoly over the sport. If Feld didn't have the FIM involved, then they WOULD have USADA involved at the very least and not by choice. USADA as they did with Lance can inject themselves however they see fit, and I'd BET that at some point they show up to SX rounds for the 250 class at some point.
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/wada_annua…
Blame those that insisted wada was the best way to go forward.
Yes, we need performance enhancing drug testing. No, we don't want needlessly long suspensions. No, we don't want suspensions for drugs that have little to no benefit in mx.
Post a reply to: Tickle at Glen Helen