Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
The Shop
Btw... you're crazy if you really think Musquin isn't a contender for 250 SX and MX titles next year.
I think a lot of people think hes old school and stiff but I kind of get a kick out of watching riders like him. Rather than flowing with the bike and being loose he totally bosses the bike. Kinda like Philipaerts and Everts he grips it real tight and uses a lot of strength. He must be incredibly fit.
Pit Row
Anybody willing to take a little time & do the math (% of greater gear reduction x peak hp), will find the same. The peak rpm of the 350 is much greater than the 450's, that translates to gear reduction to get the same final drive. Like adding a few teeth to the rear sprocket. KTM just needs a top lites rider because they're used to revving a bike - like the 350 needs to be ridden.
I think Dungey proved that at the MXoN in Colorado.
Trying to compare my riding ability to anything is plain stupid, a 125 would work fine for what I do.
It's gotta be an 875 !!!
GOSH
At the end of race 1 today Herlings on a 250 did a 2.11 lap and Cairoli could only manage a 2.15 at the start of the next race. There was no racing on the track between their races to make the track rougher
But seems some riders on a top level (at least a rider) prefers less CC than others. Not that it makes sense for all, but obviously for some.
End of story? Or should we do another 200 threads about this saying the same thing over and over?
in saying that, they seem to have more horspower in the 350 than short has this year, and alessi had last year, and there factory 250F's are easily the fastest out of the hole as well, somewhere in the race team in austria they know how to make serious power, they need to send those guys out to the states to devlep the motors,
Riding sand "well" requires good line selection and momentum, all of which favour the more agile 350. Actually burying the bike into big power sapping berms and pinning the throttle, causing the suspension to bottom out etc... is the wrong way to ride sand. It's inefficient and tiring. Even Paul Malin himself has said the same many times this weekend. Bizarrely, just as with the complete opposite conditions at the other end of the scale (i.e hard pack blue grove) you have to be concious to not override deep sand.
I think this is the same reason Mike Alessi had a brief resurgence back to form at Southwick last year. The 350 is a good bike on the more technical tracks, rather than those that favour straight line speed and hp. The last piece of the puzzle (and the most important piece) is the rider.
Post a reply to: Them underpowered KTM's 350s...