Posts
772
Joined
9/9/2010
Location
New Richland, MN
US
Edited Date/Time
6/3/2018 8:36am
Anyone know what's been done to stankdawgs scoot? I heard one vital member say +50cc when I commented on its seemingly mid motor. Listening to it, it doesn't sound like he's wringing it's neck by any means.. anyhow, I'm just curious
If the penalty is the former, cheating is certainly the better option for him.
edit: two separate posts highlighting specifically it is not a big bore; stroker motor confirmed
The Shop
Just reread your post. I thought you were talking about a 2 stroke. That’s still way too high for a RMZ. I take 50% of the vitriol off my original post.
carry on
If I were Steinke I wouldn’t hesitate to go for a few more CC’s, the displacement rule on 2 strokes is BS
I have a 1190 KTM with knobbies that puts out 150 bone stock. I must admit when I take it off road I don’t use all of that
Here is a dyno graph from 2t & 4t oem mx bikes of that era.
But, they are getting the mid / high 50s, from all reports. Pretty impressive, considering the other spec limitations on the class.
Bodes well for MX / Offroad, in that we may not be forever going for more and more revs - the usual 4t 'solution' for power. Well, other than 2 times or 1,75 times the capacity handicap given to them over 2ts, depending on the class .........
Pit Row
And for what it's worth......I don't think those 250 2 strokes have an advantage compared to any of these new 250F's. I think it's dumb the way the rules on this are structured.
My guess would be a well built KTM / Husky current 250 2t model is putting out high 50's hp.. In comparison to a well built 450 that is in the mid 60's & also has more torque due to displacement. The 450 will also be easier to ride with it getting much better traction vs. the 2t..
Post a reply to: The inside dope