The best thing about the coming 350 revolution is

user760a
Posts
1140
Joined
9/15/2008
Location
Shelby, NC US
Edited Date/Time 1/26/2012 6:37am
the huge increase in the raw fun factor.

I have noticed over the last 5-6 years that a great way to make 90 percent of the tracks I ride boring is to ride them on a 450. Maybe this is because I dont have acces to 2 mile flowing national tracks with hundreds of feet of elevation change, but the truth is most practice tracks and even a great number or race tracks are just plain more fun on a 250F or a two stroke because the big dumb 450's really do take almost all of the challenge out of obstacles...really, the only challenging thing about riding a 450 is cornering since the crank weight and inertia rules the game.

I rode twice in the last week at a local track that was an absolute riot, just a fantastic track. I rode my 250F rather than my 450 and it got me wondering if I would have had such a good time on my 450....sadly, I think the answer is no. The 250 is more of a challenge where conservation of momentum and technique are concerned and it corners so so well...the 450...blah.
|
Racer92
Posts
17967
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Central, TX US
11/30/2009 7:20am
The stopwatch is the obstacle you should be concerned with. Jumps are over-rated and for show anyway.

Run your last lap faster than your first after 30 minutes, theres the challenge all racers should be thinking about.
Hank_Thrill
Posts
4507
Joined
9/22/2008
Location
Arlen, TX US
11/30/2009 7:21am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 7:12pm
I agree...


I ride a YZ125 right now and it is a blast! I rode my friends 450f the last time we went riding, and, it's an amazing bike and all, but feels like it takes half the skill. I love riding my 125 though. I'm more concerned with just enjoying motocross, than trying to piss the furthest in my state, racing wise. However, it is a great feeling going as fast/or faster than people on thumpers Smile That, and I just prefer having a throttle governor of sorts.
500guy
Posts
12478
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
11/30/2009 7:32am
The best part is going to be the extra cost of production that will get passed along to the end user.

The Shop

user760a
Posts
1140
Joined
9/15/2008
Location
Shelby, NC US
11/30/2009 7:35am
500guy wrote:
The best part is going to be the extra cost of production that will get passed along to the end user.
you could say that about anything new. That is not a good reason to delay progress- and a 350 is progress as far as I am concerned

I am too heavy for the 250F to be really competitive on one....yet I love the thing. I ride just as fast after a half hour on it ...the 450 is just not as much fun and does not press my buttons and get me going like wringing out the 250 does...the 350 is going to replace both of my current bikes
R-acer
Posts
4047
Joined
3/20/2008
Location
Toronto CA
11/30/2009 7:36am
I don’t know about a 350 revolution... I believe KTM jumped the gun on this one, and IMO it's just an experiment......
But keep in mind they also experimented with the 525, 505 (both Discontinued now) and 144(was/is nothing but problems).

I don’t expect the Japanese manufacturers to follow this any time soon.
ratonmacias
Posts
1042
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Guadalajara MX
11/30/2009 7:45am
actually the odd 505 and 525 numbers still exist its just the marketing guys now like to call them 530.
R-acer
Posts
4047
Joined
3/20/2008
Location
Toronto CA
11/30/2009 7:48am
actually the odd 505 and 525 numbers still exist its just the marketing guys now like to call them 530.
not in the "SX" line up though.
wreckitrandy
Posts
3858
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Granite Falls, NC US
11/30/2009 7:49am
actually the odd 505 and 525 numbers still exist its just the marketing guys now like to call them 530.
How DARE you disagree with R-acer!
11/30/2009 7:52am
user760a wrote:
the huge increase in the raw fun factor. I have noticed over the last 5-6 years that a great way to make 90 percent of the...
the huge increase in the raw fun factor.

I have noticed over the last 5-6 years that a great way to make 90 percent of the tracks I ride boring is to ride them on a 450. Maybe this is because I dont have acces to 2 mile flowing national tracks with hundreds of feet of elevation change, but the truth is most practice tracks and even a great number or race tracks are just plain more fun on a 250F or a two stroke because the big dumb 450's really do take almost all of the challenge out of obstacles...really, the only challenging thing about riding a 450 is cornering since the crank weight and inertia rules the game.

I rode twice in the last week at a local track that was an absolute riot, just a fantastic track. I rode my 250F rather than my 450 and it got me wondering if I would have had such a good time on my 450....sadly, I think the answer is no. The 250 is more of a challenge where conservation of momentum and technique are concerned and it corners so so well...the 450...blah.
Do you race?

To me, if a 450 makes it easier-- then it makes you more competitive. 450s are nice for the start, too.

I love the 450 power, and I love how it makes jumps so much easier than my RM250. I understand the fun factor argument, but clearing jumps easier is not a drawback as far as I'm concerned.
R-acer
Posts
4047
Joined
3/20/2008
Location
Toronto CA
11/30/2009 7:53am
Well said Moto East Mag. Agreed!
user760a
Posts
1140
Joined
9/15/2008
Location
Shelby, NC US
11/30/2009 7:57am
well I raced a 450 and a 250F off road all year this year. No MX lately as the MX scene here in my part of the world sucks

I won races on both bikes. Had more fun on the 250, though. At my weight I could not have won once I moved up to AA, though....so my point is I need more power than a 250 puts out but dislike the 450 for various reasons. The 350 is the obvious answer

user760a
Posts
1140
Joined
9/15/2008
Location
Shelby, NC US
11/30/2009 8:00am
R-acer wrote:
I don’t know about a 350 revolution... I believe KTM jumped the gun on this one, and IMO it's just an experiment...... But keep in mind...
I don’t know about a 350 revolution... I believe KTM jumped the gun on this one, and IMO it's just an experiment......
But keep in mind they also experimented with the 525, 505 (both Discontinued now) and 144(was/is nothing but problems).

I don’t expect the Japanese manufacturers to follow this any time soon.
The fact that the 505/520/525sx went belly up only serves to prove my point, as the things that suck about 450's only get worse with additional cubes.

the 144/150 has got a tough row to hoe right off the bat...introducing a new 2 stroke at this point is a tough place to be .....wasn't the 144 plagued with mechanicals for a while there too?

I love bikes in general and on some tracks I would want a 450 for sure....it just so happens that none of those tracks are within 200 miles of my residence

rc4187
Posts
1076
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
WA US
11/30/2009 8:06am
I like my 450. If you don't have fun on one, don't buy one. Was anyone forcing you to? I also don't think a 350 would be exponentially more fun. I like the idea of the 450 being an open class. It gives those guys who aren't naturally 150 lbs enough power.
11/30/2009 8:17am
user760a wrote:
well I raced a 450 and a 250F off road all year this year. No MX lately as the MX scene here in my part of...
well I raced a 450 and a 250F off road all year this year. No MX lately as the MX scene here in my part of the world sucks

I won races on both bikes. Had more fun on the 250, though. At my weight I could not have won once I moved up to AA, though....so my point is I need more power than a 250 puts out but dislike the 450 for various reasons. The 350 is the obvious answer

250Fs are fun, and not any disadvantage for moto on most tracks. I would like to try the new RMZ250.

A 450 off-road is a handful. I tried some rocky, off-camber trails (for about two minutes before I turned around). It's too heavy and big. I will use the two-stroke for off-road stuff.
lumpy790
Posts
9284
Joined
9/18/2007
Location
York, SC US
11/30/2009 8:21am
user760a wrote:
well I raced a 450 and a 250F off road all year this year. No MX lately as the MX scene here in my part of...
well I raced a 450 and a 250F off road all year this year. No MX lately as the MX scene here in my part of the world sucks

I won races on both bikes. Had more fun on the 250, though. At my weight I could not have won once I moved up to AA, though....so my point is I need more power than a 250 puts out but dislike the 450 for various reasons. The 350 is the obvious answer

Sucks in our area?

Iron City has been a blast.
Kinetic1
Posts
2796
Joined
6/4/2009
Location
Gun Lake, MI US
11/30/2009 9:13am
I'll take an orange 350.... as soon as KTM makes a two stroke version of the bike.
DPW
Posts
1978
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
TX US
11/30/2009 9:31am
so what problem is the 350 supposedly fixing again?
user760a
Posts
1140
Joined
9/15/2008
Location
Shelby, NC US
11/30/2009 9:35am
user760a wrote:
well I raced a 450 and a 250F off road all year this year. No MX lately as the MX scene here in my part of...
well I raced a 450 and a 250F off road all year this year. No MX lately as the MX scene here in my part of the world sucks

I won races on both bikes. Had more fun on the 250, though. At my weight I could not have won once I moved up to AA, though....so my point is I need more power than a 250 puts out but dislike the 450 for various reasons. The 350 is the obvious answer

lumpy790 wrote:
Sucks in our area?

Iron City has been a blast.
I am just spoiled I guess...I used to live in tthe northeast where there are tracks that are just on another level and the loam is plentiful. I have been to Iron city and thought it was a joke. They have not taken advantage of the elevation change in a challenging /fun way.

having said that I know everyoone around here likes it but it is only because they have never been to Miles mountain in PA or area 51 in NY or any of the tracks in that area....they will spoil ya
JackLHyde
Posts
802
Joined
9/10/2006
Location
Nice Oak DE
11/30/2009 9:37am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 7:12pm
As long as KTM is the only brand offering it, I bet against the revolution. Too many narrow-headed people in MX.


I like the idea, though. I have a 450 and with the limited time I have to ride, it beats the hell out of me! You need some seattime to ride the 450 well. I can hop on a smaller displaced bike without fearing my life. I can relate to the fun factor, too. The tracks I ride on generally have some gnarly braking bumps before the jumps, because riding a 450 makes the jumps seem smaller all of a sudden. Due to the lower costs I'll keep it another year and try to get 250F + bigbore kit or a 350F.
ratonmacias
Posts
1042
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Guadalajara MX
11/30/2009 9:42am
to those saying the japs wont try anything below 450. rumor has it tony cairolis bike wasn't a 450 this year and he won MX1 championship this year. also note that the 350 can be raced against the 450 but anything above 450 cant be raced on the supercross or motocross classes thats why mx bikes over 450 dont exist.
JackLHyde
Posts
802
Joined
9/10/2006
Location
Nice Oak DE
11/30/2009 9:50am
Cairolis bike was built by Claudio de Carli. One of the team sponsors is Athena, who make aftermarket cylinders. I'm sure Japan had nothing to do with it.
moto314
Posts
892
Joined
10/20/2009
Location
Mooresville, NC US
11/30/2009 9:51am
I have a 250F and a 450F, and feel the 250 is more fun to ride, but not as competitive. That's why it's not 250cc displacement but a 276cc, before that I had a 283cc, a 315cc, and a 302cc. All where big bore and/or big bore stroker 250Fs, perfect vet race bikes and very competitive against 450Fs, no need for me to wait till they make em, I've been riding them since 2002!
11/30/2009 10:07am
I had a chance to visit with one of the KTM factory mechanics yesterday and got a bit more info on the 350.

The chassis is all new (not a 250F chassis) and the design focus was on handling since the power of the 350 engine will be at least 10 ponies more (in stock form) than the 250 engine, But the chassis did not need to rigidity reguired to bolt in a 450 engine. So even with the electric starter, it will weigh more than a 250, but will be considerably less than the 450. So there will be a horsepower to weight advantage over the 450's.

Sounds like the right combination to me!
oldx
Posts
3046
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Camano Island, WA US
11/30/2009 10:14am
Kinetic1 wrote:
I'll take an orange 350.... as soon as KTM makes a two stroke version of the bike.
Maybe you should ride a 300 KTM, quite possibly the best 2 stroke motor ever built.
holeshot100
Posts
1176
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Billings, MO US
11/30/2009 12:50pm Edited Date/Time 11/30/2009 1:00pm
I love my Yamaha 350!

Picture next post.
holeshot100
Posts
1176
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Billings, MO US
11/30/2009 12:53pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 7:12pm


See if it works this time.
11/30/2009 1:01pm
i would love a 350! I'm to big for a 250f (6'2 210lbs) I can handle a 450 pretty good but nothing compared to a 250f, when i jump on one of those they feel like a pit bike almost.
txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX US
11/30/2009 1:19pm
as always, it's win and you're in!

If the KTM impresses on the track we'll see more. Pretty simple.
mxgoon
Posts
1053
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Sydney AU
11/30/2009 1:30pm
user760a wrote:
the huge increase in the raw fun factor. I have noticed over the last 5-6 years that a great way to make 90 percent of the...
the huge increase in the raw fun factor.

I have noticed over the last 5-6 years that a great way to make 90 percent of the tracks I ride boring is to ride them on a 450. Maybe this is because I dont have acces to 2 mile flowing national tracks with hundreds of feet of elevation change, but the truth is most practice tracks and even a great number or race tracks are just plain more fun on a 250F or a two stroke because the big dumb 450's really do take almost all of the challenge out of obstacles...really, the only challenging thing about riding a 450 is cornering since the crank weight and inertia rules the game.

I rode twice in the last week at a local track that was an absolute riot, just a fantastic track. I rode my 250F rather than my 450 and it got me wondering if I would have had such a good time on my 450....sadly, I think the answer is no. The 250 is more of a challenge where conservation of momentum and technique are concerned and it corners so so well...the 450...blah.
Sell your 450 and bore out your 250. Problem solved.

Now maybe you should pay more attention to your sig.

Post a reply to: The best thing about the coming 350 revolution is

The Latest