Posts
2521
Joined
9/16/2009
Location
Portland, OR
US
Fantasy
169th
So obviously Forkner isn't too pumped about Zacko's pass on him last week. This post isnt to debate whether the pass was dirty or not. What I'm wondering is. Since Forkner stated in a post race interview that someone (obviously Zach) has a target on his back. If and when Austin does retaliate, it seems that the AMA would have no choice but to throw the book at him because he was foolish enough to essentially "call his shot".
IMO it was very stupid of him to make such a statement, it's not doing to do anything but hurt him.... unless the AMA goes off the reservation again on how they deal with penalties. Austin is still very much in this title hunt, and Mitch better have a good talk with him so he doesn't do anything that jeopardizes his chance.
IMO it was very stupid of him to make such a statement, it's not doing to do anything but hurt him.... unless the AMA goes off the reservation again on how they deal with penalties. Austin is still very much in this title hunt, and Mitch better have a good talk with him so he doesn't do anything that jeopardizes his chance.
I guess all I am saying is that Austin should have just kept his mouth shut, paid Osborne back and move on. But the genie is out of the bottle at this point. I mean, look at what happened to Chad a couple years ago with Canard.
The Shop
It could easily be explained as the one to beat and they plan to do it.
Don't really see how a vague statement like that could be a factor in disciplining aggressive riding,
Well, I guess we are talking about John gallegher, so you better not hit anybody if you are out of the top ten unless you are a factory rider coming through after a bad start.
It would be kind of cool to see an old fashioned slam/grudge fest like howerton vs hannah or chicken vs bradshaw vs Larry ward
Post a reply to: Target on his back