Starting gate change proposal

yz133rider
Posts
4467
Joined
8/1/2013
Location
Avondale, PA US
How many races does a top guy get a great start and his main rivals are buried and that decides the whole race?

When the top guys all start together how awesome and rare is that?! It's like wow here we go it's on.

Why not take a look at the starting gate.

Right now if you qualify first or last the only difference is where on the gate you get to pick. Last place guys still have nearly the same chance of a Hole shot despite qualifying last.

I say make the gate diagonal. First place pick is on the inside, second place is one over and six inches back, and each position is six inches behind the next.

This would to my eye give a more distinct advantage to the better qualifying spots, allowing the top guys to all start together and thus less races getting wrecked before the second turn.

Also we should consider black flagging lappers after maybe 2+ laps down, or having a 106% rule like f1 did. The Lappers are downright dangerous and confusing trying to figure out positioning on the race track for many viewers.
|
yz133rider
Posts
4467
Joined
8/1/2013
Location
Avondale, PA US
9/5/2017 7:59am
This would be especially beneficial to sx in my opinion. And could greatly reduce the first turn pile ups.
Zaugg
Posts
1084
Joined
9/1/2012
Location
Not California, CA US
9/5/2017 8:05am Edited Date/Time 9/5/2017 8:06am
...but what is Jeff Emig going to say as a replacement for "getting a good start" as one of his Keys to the Race?
JustMX
Posts
4609
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
TN US
9/5/2017 8:18am
Screw that. Too complicated.

Set the water truck to spray 20' wide.start at one side, one pass, next 20' two passes. Next 20' 3 passes, y the time you get to the other end of the 140' gate you are looking at 14 trips.

Now to make it interesting, have a drawing After qualifying to decide which end the fast qualifiers start from.

Put 10 pins for dry side, 1 pin for the wet side.

Whatever side the fastest guy gets, then the second place guy lines up next to him, and so on down the gate.

Tada......

Mx/sx fixed.....you are welcome
Renner153
Posts
1360
Joined
12/10/2008
Location
Mulberry, FL US
Fantasy
3578th
9/5/2017 8:21am
How about if the good guys learn to start? The only gate change that would be worth doing is going to the mesh like the GP series did.

The Shop

tcallahan707
Posts
1826
Joined
4/5/2016
Location
Morrison, CO US
9/5/2017 8:27am
Soooo....staggered start? Sounds gay.

Anyone want to go back to a staggered restart in SX and see how much better the racing is? I find it hard to believe sending the fastest guy out first leads to a great race.

Someone else had mentioned it but the best change that could be made is award championship points for qualifying and then invert gate pick based on qualifying. Maybe then a staggered start would make sense but that's a big maybe. I still feel that a great starter should be rewarded. It's a skill and mindset that one must develop.
mx317
Posts
4554
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
TN US
9/5/2017 8:38am
I remember being told by an old Honda mechanic (Eric Crippa) after I was complaining about someone beating me I usually beat because he got a good start. He said they are many parts to racing MX, starts, speed, conditioning, and a good bike. Any of the parts weak and results suffer. Learn to get good starts.
just James
Posts
1133
Joined
12/20/2012
Location
Wolf Creek, OR US
9/5/2017 8:57am
This sounds great. Make sure that the fastest guy gets to the first turn first, then the second fastest second, and so on. This way we can eliminate all of that dangerous passing crap. They can just ride around in single file, and when someone is about to get lapped, he should be black flagged. BRILLIANT! In fact, we can just determine the finishing order by the qualifying times and eliminate all of the dangers of racing.
9/5/2017 9:11am
AX style starts for SX. 10 guys up front, 10 in the back. Yes, also reduce back to 20 rider mains. Too many lappers in the way as it is.
ga_pike
Posts
2607
Joined
7/14/2011
Location
Valdosta, GA US
9/5/2017 9:24am
Rolling NASCAR style start. Line up 2x2 and do a parade lap and when they get back to the start straight, have a "go area"...
GuyB
Posts
35699
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
Fantasy
988th
9/5/2017 9:39am
Not sure I get the need for this, but...

Given the setup you describe, you're talking a 9.5" start area difference for the top qualifier to the last qualifier in SX, and a 19.5" difference for outdoor races.

If you implement this at all the National tracks, you're talking about reconfiguring every start on the circuit...which also affects every amateur race held there. How would you handle that at local races?

I also think with that much of an angle, you'd either have to make every gate somewhat wider, or figure out a way to completely reconfigure how starting gate are made. Coming across the gate at an angle, every rider would get some kind of sideways.
Rowlands
Posts
1706
Joined
2/4/2015
Location
GB
9/5/2017 9:55am
It won't work. The inside or outside gate isn't always the one the rider picks it depends on the first turn.

Although the current ones aren't staggered they kind of can seem like that due to the angle of the fist turn. If it's a long sweeping narrow left hand turn the guy on the far right gate pick has to go a hell of a lot longer way around than the guy on the inside which is a disadvantage IMO ( unless your RJ Hampshire)



hyler199
Posts
621
Joined
4/23/2017
Location
CA
9/5/2017 12:08pm
just James wrote:
This sounds great. Make sure that the fastest guy gets to the first turn first, then the second fastest second, and so on. This way we...
This sounds great. Make sure that the fastest guy gets to the first turn first, then the second fastest second, and so on. This way we can eliminate all of that dangerous passing crap. They can just ride around in single file, and when someone is about to get lapped, he should be black flagged. BRILLIANT! In fact, we can just determine the finishing order by the qualifying times and eliminate all of the dangers of racing.
lmao right??

staggered start sounds like a fuckin terrible idea. if anything the only way a staggard line would work is if the fastest guy is at the back of the pack lmao battle royale. Or why not just get everybody behind a gate and do a 20 rider wide short straight rhythm into the first corner

I really liked the monster energy cup drop styles a lot. Im impartial to the gate starts, might give privateers a more equal playing field maybe.
TXDirt
Posts
7399
Joined
7/29/2015
Location
Plano, TX US
9/5/2017 12:37pm
Soooo....staggered start? Sounds gay. Anyone want to go back to a staggered restart in SX and see how much better the racing is? I find it...
Soooo....staggered start? Sounds gay.

Anyone want to go back to a staggered restart in SX and see how much better the racing is? I find it hard to believe sending the fastest guy out first leads to a great race.

Someone else had mentioned it but the best change that could be made is award championship points for qualifying and then invert gate pick based on qualifying. Maybe then a staggered start would make sense but that's a big maybe. I still feel that a great starter should be rewarded. It's a skill and mindset that one must develop.
That's been my idea I've been pushing for the last several years here. You really only need it in SX because there is so much follow the leader the racing just gets flat boring as hell. Not as big of a problem in outdoors.

But anyways, I'll say it again for the hundredth time. The problem in SX is we don't see enough passes being made. The first 50 feet of the race has become too important and negatively affects the remaining 20 laps.

Changing the points system or some kind of "chase" format doesn't do anything for the on-track racing and that is the problem. The problem is the on-track racing is stale. By lap 3 in a lot of races you might as well just pack up and beat the traffic home.

Another problem with racing is the lack of exposure for some of the second tier teams as well as privateers.

So how can we fix the on track racing and increase exposure?

Well simple.

Pay some championship points in the qualifiers and then for the main event invert the gate pick order.

And don't say well people will just sand bag the qualifiers to get a better gate pick. No they won't. Go back and re-read the sentence above. If you pay some championship points in the qualifiers then the riders will race to win them just as they do now. And frankly the heats are about the only time we see actual racing with the current race format.

By inverting the start picks this will allow some of the second tier teams to get better starts, thus having their sponsors get a little TV time. This also will mean that the faster riders will not get a great start and thus will need to make some passes to get to the front.

We need to go away from the first 50 feet of the race being uber critical to the point it's hurting the remaining 20 laps and creating a race environment that is making spectators yawn.

Anyways, It's too easy. So everyone just stay focused on changing the points format or some other stupid thing that does nothing to improve the on-track racing.
Phillip_Lamb
Posts
1924
Joined
12/14/2010
Location
ORANGEVALE, CA US
Fantasy
2447th
9/5/2017 12:48pm
Soooo....staggered start? Sounds gay. Anyone want to go back to a staggered restart in SX and see how much better the racing is? I find it...
Soooo....staggered start? Sounds gay.

Anyone want to go back to a staggered restart in SX and see how much better the racing is? I find it hard to believe sending the fastest guy out first leads to a great race.

Someone else had mentioned it but the best change that could be made is award championship points for qualifying and then invert gate pick based on qualifying. Maybe then a staggered start would make sense but that's a big maybe. I still feel that a great starter should be rewarded. It's a skill and mindset that one must develop.
the idea has some merit, when they have had to do a reestart mid way through a race they are lined up diagonally

not sure it would fit in the sport but who knows.

Heck if you wanted to add some changes, i would say do an automatic restart halfway through, add in a joker lap, and have more than 1 main event (this is SX specific though).
sumdood
Posts
5543
Joined
3/11/2013
Location
San Clemente, CA US
Fantasy
1282nd
9/5/2017 12:48pm
For SX ? I like this idea for gate picks in the main. First race of the year gate picks go by qualifying times like normal. After the first round gate picks in the main go by overall series points. 20th in points gets first gate pick, 19th gets 2nd pick, 18th gets 3rd pick and on down the line with the current points leader getting last gate pick. Continue that for the whole season. Whoever has the least series points that makes it into the main gets first gate pick. Go in order by points, with the points leader last pick every week. Yes I know it would mean hectic starts, Mid pack or back riders getting holeshots, and lots of passing. The races are already freight trains with minimal passing, why not mix it up a bit.
Forty
Posts
2804
Joined
7/27/2009
Location
Saint Paul, MN US
9/5/2017 12:48pm
Numbers on clothes pins. Hold the bucket up high so no one can look in.

Old school bitches. It worked.
MX Guy
Posts
2209
Joined
7/18/2016
Location
Murrieta, CA US
Fantasy
668th
9/5/2017 12:54pm
Start picks by lottery, mix 'em up and let her rip.
Yep
tcallahan707
Posts
1826
Joined
4/5/2016
Location
Morrison, CO US
9/5/2017 1:14pm
Start picks by lottery, mix 'em up and let her rip.
MX Guy wrote:
Yep
So a championship can be decided by pulling a clothespin in Vegas? Seems like a shitstorm waiting to happen.
APLMAN99
Posts
10098
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Dallas, TX US
9/5/2017 1:28pm
yz133rider wrote:
How many races does a top guy get a great start and his main rivals are buried and that decides the whole race? When the top...
How many races does a top guy get a great start and his main rivals are buried and that decides the whole race?

When the top guys all start together how awesome and rare is that?! It's like wow here we go it's on.

Why not take a look at the starting gate.

Right now if you qualify first or last the only difference is where on the gate you get to pick. Last place guys still have nearly the same chance of a Hole shot despite qualifying last.

I say make the gate diagonal. First place pick is on the inside, second place is one over and six inches back, and each position is six inches behind the next.

This would to my eye give a more distinct advantage to the better qualifying spots, allowing the top guys to all start together and thus less races getting wrecked before the second turn.

Also we should consider black flagging lappers after maybe 2+ laps down, or having a 106% rule like f1 did. The Lappers are downright dangerous and confusing trying to figure out positioning on the race track for many viewers.
Why not just award finishing position based on qualifying times? Heck, why not just hold a vote to determine the winner of the event?

Seriously, this is a great example of a solution without a real problem..........
9/5/2017 1:44pm
sumdood wrote:
For SX ? I like this idea for gate picks in the main. First race of the year gate picks go by qualifying times like normal...
For SX ? I like this idea for gate picks in the main. First race of the year gate picks go by qualifying times like normal. After the first round gate picks in the main go by overall series points. 20th in points gets first gate pick, 19th gets 2nd pick, 18th gets 3rd pick and on down the line with the current points leader getting last gate pick. Continue that for the whole season. Whoever has the least series points that makes it into the main gets first gate pick. Go in order by points, with the points leader last pick every week. Yes I know it would mean hectic starts, Mid pack or back riders getting holeshots, and lots of passing. The races are already freight trains with minimal passing, why not mix it up a bit.
Except invert only the top 8 (or maybe 10). USAC midget racing at Indy Speedrome used to invert the top X (10, I believe). Rich Vogler would usually win, but it would take almost the entire race for him to get to the front. By inverting only the top X cars, the faster racers didn't have to deal with the back marks/track hazards. If they had started normally (non-inverted), it would have been a complete snooze fest. With the inverted start, there were some really great races to watch.
Robgvx
Posts
3687
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
9/5/2017 2:03pm
Giving the fastest rider the best chance of a holeshot is a sure fire way to get runaway, boring races.
Acidreamer
Posts
1794
Joined
8/25/2015
Location
Mansfield, OH US
9/5/2017 2:17pm
Thats counterproductive. Having the fastest guy out front off the bat is going to worsen the problem youre trying to solve.

AT THE END OF THE DAY, the better man always wins. No matter what you change.
KMC440
Posts
7764
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
9/5/2017 2:59pm Edited Date/Time 9/5/2017 3:03pm
Start picks by lottery, mix 'em up and let her rip.
It would add to the "show" the top 10 riders have to pick from 20 numbered discs. The second 10 get what numbers are left based on qualifying to speed up the show.

The number you pick is your gate not an order to pick a gate. The second ten go in numbered order of gates remaining.

It can work easily and only take 5min.

Another system is an invert draw. Top qualifier goes up and draws the invert for the main, 0, 2, 4, 8 or ALL. Obviously the "0" pill is the most desirable. Gate picks are then done accordingly.

A lot of drama can be pimped in either scenario.
I've seen both systems used in the World of Outlaws and IRA Sprint Car series'. It works.
APLMAN99
Posts
10098
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Dallas, TX US
9/5/2017 3:14pm
The only change that I'd really like to see is going back to the rubber bands/surgical tubing. Jump that and you get a nice burn on your neck but not strangled or decapitated.
Forty
Posts
2804
Joined
7/27/2009
Location
Saint Paul, MN US
9/5/2017 3:18pm
APLMAN99 wrote:
The only change that I'd really like to see is going back to the rubber bands/surgical tubing. Jump that and you get a nice burn on...
The only change that I'd really like to see is going back to the rubber bands/surgical tubing. Jump that and you get a nice burn on your neck but not strangled or decapitated.
haahha...everyone that raced in the 70's early 80's had to deal with that....we all say we were whipped by it but it rarely happened to the degree we all say it did. I never personally got it but on an outside gate it would cause a slight hesitation and some people did get tore up by it.
philG
Posts
9710
Joined
5/12/2012
Location
GB
9/5/2017 4:07pm
They did this at Valkenswaard GP this year, and it sucked.
ATKpilot99
Posts
9806
Joined
4/13/2010
Location
Lake Geneva, WI US
9/5/2017 4:46pm Edited Date/Time 9/5/2017 4:46pm
Hand on head rubberband start

Post a reply to: Starting gate change proposal

The Latest