Should spinal protection be required in 2015?

The Rock
Posts
8759
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI US
Edited Date/Time 11/19/2013 5:40pm


Is there any good reason why spinal protection isn't mandatory? Forget chest protector and neck brace debates can't we all get on the same page on such a no brainer topic? It is past time we update required safety equipment list.
|
JeepnMike
Posts
2526
Joined
10/18/2012
Location
Enumclaw, WA US
11/15/2013 7:27pm
lostboy819 wrote:
Here we go again.
LOL. I haven't seen one of these before. I will be the first man enough to admit, wearing that thing would have to feel something like getting a prostate exam and trying to ride at the same time.
lostboy819
Posts
11892
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Black Forest , CO US
Fantasy
493rd
11/15/2013 7:31pm Edited Date/Time 11/15/2013 7:33pm
We used them when we raced speedway.They are there if you go down at speed and get hit from behind , road racers use them also but won't do anything for MX and Its not going to prevent spinal injury's. Rocks right, this thread is a no brainer.
ocscottie
Posts
69102
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Redding, CA US
11/15/2013 7:34pm
Not sure if Kenny is still wearing this, but i sure love the concept:



The Shop

KMC440
Posts
7764
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
11/15/2013 7:41pm Edited Date/Time 11/15/2013 7:44pm
Mandatory? This isn't Russia is it.... is this Russia ?

Good protection from a variety of products but mandatory.....
lostboy819
Posts
11892
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Black Forest , CO US
Fantasy
493rd
11/15/2013 8:03pm
Why stop there,this would stop all injuries and should be made mandatory retroactive.
JM485
Posts
5543
Joined
10/1/2013
Location
Davis, CA US
11/15/2013 8:08pm
I don't really like the idea of forcing anyone to wear anything. If you want to wear it, more power to you for considering safety, but if you don't I don't think you should be forced to. As much as I believe in neck braces, I would never force anyone to wear one, its just not right.
The Rock
Posts
8759
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI US
11/15/2013 9:16pm
lostboy819 wrote:
We used them when we raced speedway.They are there if you go down at speed and get hit from behind , road racers use them also...
We used them when we raced speedway.They are there if you go down at speed and get hit from behind , road racers use them also but won't do anything for MX and Its not going to prevent spinal injury's. Rocks right, this thread is a no brainer.
It is the off season for sure RE: here we go again.
What do you base "they won't do anything in MX" on?
lostboy819
Posts
11892
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Black Forest , CO US
Fantasy
493rd
11/15/2013 10:09pm
What do you base your "Spinal protection required in 2015" ? You are just making shit up. Those have been out for decades, we used them in speedway and roadracers use them so why don't they use them in MX ? WOW it has a built in kidney belt so it must be mandatory in motocross in 2015 because "the rock" said so.
coastie44
Posts
559
Joined
1/19/2013
Location
NorCal, CA US
11/15/2013 10:16pm Edited Date/Time 11/15/2013 10:17pm
Rock - Please go back to mototalk.
wardy
Posts
1778
Joined
3/31/2008
Location
US
11/15/2013 10:20pm
sure it likely states on it's disclaimer tag "not intended for spinal cord support"

just like a chest protector says.

so sure lets make it mandatory.



or better yet why not make a good pr campaign so no one thinks not wearing one is a good idea. make it "cool" to do.
mojoman42
Posts
732
Joined
8/18/2011
Location
AL US
11/15/2013 10:37pm
JM485 wrote:
I don't really like the idea of forcing anyone to wear anything. If you want to wear it, more power to you for considering safety, but...
I don't really like the idea of forcing anyone to wear anything. If you want to wear it, more power to you for considering safety, but if you don't I don't think you should be forced to. As much as I believe in neck braces, I would never force anyone to wear one, its just not right.
It makes a lot of sense to make protection mandatory in pro racing. If pros wear safety gear, ordinary people (and especially kids) are more likely to wear it. Would you argue against mandatory helmets?
The Rock
Posts
8759
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI US
11/15/2013 10:55pm
mojoman42 wrote:
It makes a lot of sense to make protection mandatory in pro racing. If pros wear safety gear, ordinary people (and especially kids) are more likely...
It makes a lot of sense to make protection mandatory in pro racing. If pros wear safety gear, ordinary people (and especially kids) are more likely to wear it. Would you argue against mandatory helmets?
I couldn't agree more.
JM485
Posts
5543
Joined
10/1/2013
Location
Davis, CA US
11/15/2013 11:03pm
JM485 wrote:
I don't really like the idea of forcing anyone to wear anything. If you want to wear it, more power to you for considering safety, but...
I don't really like the idea of forcing anyone to wear anything. If you want to wear it, more power to you for considering safety, but if you don't I don't think you should be forced to. As much as I believe in neck braces, I would never force anyone to wear one, its just not right.
mojoman42 wrote:
It makes a lot of sense to make protection mandatory in pro racing. If pros wear safety gear, ordinary people (and especially kids) are more likely...
It makes a lot of sense to make protection mandatory in pro racing. If pros wear safety gear, ordinary people (and especially kids) are more likely to wear it. Would you argue against mandatory helmets?
Absolutely not, that is a good point. I feel that these pieces of protective equipment are in different categories, in a way though. Helmets seem absolutely necessary, while braces and such seem more like a choice. Just my opinion though.
lostboy819
Posts
11892
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Black Forest , CO US
Fantasy
493rd
11/15/2013 11:06pm Edited Date/Time 11/15/2013 11:07pm
JM485 wrote:
I don't really like the idea of forcing anyone to wear anything. If you want to wear it, more power to you for considering safety, but...
I don't really like the idea of forcing anyone to wear anything. If you want to wear it, more power to you for considering safety, but if you don't I don't think you should be forced to. As much as I believe in neck braces, I would never force anyone to wear one, its just not right.
mojoman42 wrote:
It makes a lot of sense to make protection mandatory in pro racing. If pros wear safety gear, ordinary people (and especially kids) are more likely...
It makes a lot of sense to make protection mandatory in pro racing. If pros wear safety gear, ordinary people (and especially kids) are more likely to wear it. Would you argue against mandatory helmets?
Helmets have been proven to help protect from injury or even death. This is a pad for the back that doesn't do much if anything to help protect your spine. Good luck trying to get anyone to wear it and most any set of shoulder pads with a back will do the same thing. Hell lets just wrap everyone in bubble wrap and that will solve the injury problem. Pinch While your at it why not start a riders union.
GuyB
Posts
35719
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
Fantasy
1672nd
11/15/2013 11:45pm
The Rock wrote:
[img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2013/11/15/36586/s1200_4144_black_1_1.jpg[/img] Is there any good reason why spinal protection isn't mandatory? Forget chest protector and neck brace debates can't we all get on the same page...


Is there any good reason why spinal protection isn't mandatory? Forget chest protector and neck brace debates can't we all get on the same page on such a no brainer topic? It is past time we update required safety equipment list.
Rock, please try and use some common sense in your subject lines. This one reads as a statement when it should clearly be a question.
Crush
Posts
21019
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney AU
11/16/2013 3:54am
Subject Title notwithstanding, I do think the protection and the rules around it in our sport are archaic.

And a lot of people have passed or suffered minor injuries without a lot of progress
mxdude105
Posts
628
Joined
12/5/2011
Location
MD US
11/16/2013 4:33am
If you don't want to wear protective gear, don't wear it. That said, if you're riding and jumping a 250lb bike on rough terrain at speed while wearing nothing between your skin and the environment but a cotton jersey.....congratulations, you're a fucking idiot.
Olson
Posts
4605
Joined
4/14/2012
Location
SE
11/16/2013 4:52am
Spinal protection have been required over here for ages.
Spartacus
Posts
2269
Joined
5/20/2011
Location
PW US
11/16/2013 5:03am
I'm sure the people that manufacture ear lobe and penis braces want you to wear all their crap. If you're that worried about getting hurt you probably will.
yzmatt
Posts
371
Joined
7/28/2009
Location
TX US
11/16/2013 7:23am
Sure, a back board might prevent a foot peg from snapping your spine, but aren't 99 out of 100 MX related spinal injuries caused by lawn dart or rag doll type impacts?

Life is dangerous. MX is VERY dangerous. Accept it.
11/16/2013 7:58am
The Rock wrote:
[img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2013/11/15/36586/s1200_4144_black_1_1.jpg[/img] Is there any good reason why spinal protection isn't mandatory? Forget chest protector and neck brace debates can't we all get on the same page...


Is there any good reason why spinal protection isn't mandatory? Forget chest protector and neck brace debates can't we all get on the same page on such a no brainer topic? It is past time we update required safety equipment list.
I should wear one of those all day every day. My posture is horrible.
11/16/2013 8:04am
Some of the European downhill mountain bike races have mandatory protection rules. From memory I think it was gloves, elbow pads and possibly spinal protection too but I'm not sure on that last one. There are a lot of mtb riders out there that don't ride in any of that stuff and they hate having to wear it for these select races. I'm sure the ama riders would feel the same.
11/16/2013 8:06am
JM485 wrote:
I don't really like the idea of forcing anyone to wear anything. If you want to wear it, more power to you for considering safety, but...
I don't really like the idea of forcing anyone to wear anything. If you want to wear it, more power to you for considering safety, but if you don't I don't think you should be forced to. As much as I believe in neck braces, I would never force anyone to wear one, its just not right.


This surely will help the spine.
"It saved my life, if I didn't have this suit on I would surely be paralyzed from my trip and fall last week. "
Regis
Posts
2740
Joined
6/17/2008
Location
Gonzales, LA US
Fantasy
485th
11/16/2013 8:07am Edited Date/Time 11/16/2013 8:12am
The Rock wrote:
[img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2013/11/15/36586/s1200_4144_black_1_1.jpg[/img] Is there any good reason why spinal protection isn't mandatory? Forget chest protector and neck brace debates can't we all get on the same page...


Is there any good reason why spinal protection isn't mandatory? Forget chest protector and neck brace debates can't we all get on the same page on such a no brainer topic? It is past time we update required safety equipment list.
Liability.

Making a Leatt, or even this mandatory opens up the door for liability.

This is America, where everyone wants to point the blame and make a buck. Make this mandatory, and you will get people suing when it doesn't prevent a spinal injury or some lawyer makes a case that it increased the chances of one.
seth505
Posts
9553
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
SD, CA US
Fantasy
1722nd
11/16/2013 8:34am
Why the fuck do people make subject lines like this, is it too much work to add a "?"

I opened this thinking someone found concrete info on new regulations for 2015 but no it's just another post someone mustered up for the shit of it...Ok I'm done.
philG
Posts
10104
Joined
5/12/2012
Location
GB
11/16/2013 8:47am
I wear one all the time for Supermoto, the speeds make it a no brainer, crashing on tarmac hurts big time , although folk still wear MX style tops with armour underneath... usually if its free or until they crash for the first time , and then its fecked.

For MX , i wear body armour , its enough .
Hank_Thrill
Posts
4539
Joined
9/22/2008
Location
Arlen, TX US
11/16/2013 11:31am Edited Date/Time 11/16/2013 11:32am
lostboy819 wrote:
Why stop there,this would stop all injuries and should be made mandatory retroactive. [img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2013/11/15/36591/s1200_30000453_1288183994_396000.jpg[/img]
Why stop there,this would stop all injuries and should be made mandatory retroactive.
I've always thought a race in sumo suits would be incredibly entertaining to watch. Just imagine one flying over a triple.

Post a reply to: Should spinal protection be required in 2015?

The Latest