Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
According to this post, if you were a race promoter or organizing body, and you had a large participant pool who so desperately wanted to compete in a specific class at your events that they'd mortgage their homes, you would turn them away en masse?
Doesn't sound like a good strategy to me.
As others have pointed out....that tactic might bankrupt motocross. C class is about the only damn class locally that still pulls 20+ a race.
The Shop
The regional system works pretty well. It truly guarantees the best of the best are there to compete.
Now If areas truly had 100s showing up for the qualifier then yea you don’t need to overbook the regional. But look at the check marks on the results.....there are people that finish top In qualifying spots and don’t have a check. Meaning they ain’t racing the regional. Atleast with the power ranking system and the 60 something slots you know you’re racing the best of the best for the entire region.
Don’t have to overbook Loretta’s because the regional already guaranteed that the fastest people were there duking it out. Not all qualifiers have huge turnouts. So this it’s all about money argument annoys me in regards to overbooking regionals. But I can see in favor of the money argument when there’s 50 million c classes.
When I was younger you wanted to move up . Earn so many novice points and you moved to amateur , then earn so many amateur points you move up to expert . I never made expert, but 30 years later at track days I have pride that I have moved up.
We do not believe any amateurs should have a National Championship Race.
A National championship should not have skill levels and should be the top level Pro riders.
Big $$$ is put back into the sport from C riders. Majority of them are parents footing the bill. Their buying little Johnny whatever he wants and most are probably paying full retail. Next to the vets, they are keeping the sport going.
As someone else mentioned, some kids are not good mini bike riders but when they hit the big bike something clicks and they take off. My brother and I both were like that. And if it wasn’t for me qualifying in the C class for Loretta’s, I’m not sure how far I would have went or continued the sport. It gave me the determination and drive to continue getting better with racing and keep going back.
The local C class and the national level are two totally different categories. Most don’t know the difference and label anyone that is faster than them a sand bagger.
You should get one year in beginner class regardless of speed on minis. Then another year when you go to big bikes. That's it. After that it's C/B/Novice/Intermediate/whatever but not beginner. Both my boys rode less than a year in beginner on minis and moved to B within a year each time they changed classes. Sucks though as B class gates in the NW are usually tiny. Haviong 5 kids in 85b or 250/opn B is pretty good here.......
I think if C class keeps Loretta's alive what's the harm? Never see one of my boys trying to "make" it in the C class but what we do isn't for everyone...................Plenty of people silly enough to chase the dream and that's their choice.....
Pit Row
Post a reply to: Should Loretta’s have a C class