SX or MX?

ChrisB10
Posts
2082
Joined
5/24/2014
Location
Plattsburgh, NY US
Edited Date/Time 7/14/2014 12:35pm
What do you like more?

What's been better in 2014? Supy or Outdoors?

I like the outdoors scenery but for the most part think the SX racing is tighter. Outdoors has been crazy with the 250 class this year but so far it's not close to the 2014 SX season!
|
kongols
Posts
24152
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga LV
7/12/2014 2:52pm Edited Date/Time 7/12/2014 2:53pm
ATKpilot99 wrote:
Outdoors. It's not even close.
What he said./\

The Shop

shuggs
Posts
1627
Joined
8/6/2008
Location
Dunfermline GB
7/12/2014 3:14pm
bigborefan wrote:
SX is just an MX sideshow.
True it's just to pass winter till the real racing starts (even though sx is where tge big bucks are)
Sunhouse
Posts
3598
Joined
3/2/2009
Location
NO
7/12/2014 3:14pm
SX is rather lame IMO, but I´m a Euro.... It´s a temporary fix until the GP´s and nationals start
7/12/2014 3:52pm
I like:

-Anaheim (hype, new bikes)
-Atlanta (I attend the race)
-Daytona (nostalgia)
-Las Vegas (finally its over!)

Otherwise, I wake up on the couch at 3am with the "recording has stopped" menu on my tv more often than not.

Outdoors is true dirt bike competition.
7/14/2014 11:05am
If I may: That's an easy one for me. Which one is James Stewart better at?



Sums it up.

Pretty typical fare from the "core" moto fans, calling SX a sideshow. Too bad the 2011 SX season kicked the bloody shit out of the MX season that came before it, for racing and excitement. Likewise the 2013 SX season. If not for the little bikes we'd be bored out of our skulls every other summer. Everyone screaming "Whoo! Outdoors! Time for the real racing!" Yeah, about half the time. And it's not just SX thinning the field, either.

Supercross theoretically is more interesting. MX has varying lines on a 2-D plane that make the racing happen -- you know, position swappage and all that. SX is more about varying lines in 3-D space, vertically, which makes it unique among other forms of racing and which should lead to the same swappage of positions. Unfortunately, SX tracks are nowhere as interesting as they could be (or used to be), so the racing does tend to spoil.

Since SX is missing what makes MX great and vice versa, obviously a combo track would be a very cool thing. The main thing MX has that SX does not is space. We have Daytona and the Monster Cup, which are both half-assed hybrids, but the sport can do better. Paging Redbull...
IceMan446
Posts
4672
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA US
7/14/2014 11:07am
I like both equally for different reasons.

7/14/2014 12:31pm
Sheriff245 wrote:
SX on TV, MX in person.
SX does work better for TV.

Outdoors is core, always has been and always will be. SX was better when they ran smokers, it's more twist and go now and everyone can jump everything out there with the four strokes.

How could you blame someone for doing a SX only contract though if they were the top dog, and could make big frikkin bucks and only have to beat themselves up part of the year if they didn't lose any ground to the competition by setting out.
Gebken40
Posts
202
Joined
3/25/2013
Location
Grain Valley, MO US
7/14/2014 12:35pm
I just wish the TV package for Outdoors wasn't complete garbage.

Post a reply to: SX or MX?

The Latest