Older Ford Ranger as a Moto Truck

ThatOneKid
Posts
195
Joined
2/18/2016
Location
Royal Oak, MI US
Slowly but surely trying to get back into mx. Step one of that would be having a way to transport a bike. I am not looking to spend an arm and a leg as I have a perfectly good car that's only a year and a half old that I am going to keep still. I also don't think I want or need a fullsize truck which brings me to the Ford Ranger. I can kill two birds with one stone by having a much better vehicle for the winter, and giving myself the OPTION to get a bike.

How do the Rangers from 2000-2004 do as moto trucks? I'd get one with 4x4, a super cab, and the 6 foot bed. I would not be towing a trailer or anything just looking to put a bike and some gear in the bed. Will a full size bike or two fit in the bed with a bed extender that i'm assuming you need? Will I have to worry about bending the front of the bed when tieing down bikes against it? Will the front of the bed need reinforced with a simple 2x4 frame etc?

If there are any other smaller or mid size trucks you use or would recommend please share and show your setup, I work for Ford so I am slightly biased Smile

Thanks

Collin
|
9/15/2016 10:38am Edited Date/Time 9/15/2016 10:43am
There was never a Ford Ranger crew cab in the US market. There was a Ford "Explorer Sport Trac" crew cab, but it was not available with a 6' bed.
RandyS
Posts
6184
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Grass Valley, CA US
9/15/2016 10:54am
I had an 05 super cab which was the 2 extra half doors, anyone larger than a 10 year old was miserable sitting in the back but it's good for gear bags. If you look at the bed or body wrong it will bend, of course my F150 is the same way. Definitely reinforce the front.
colintrax
Posts
4704
Joined
8/25/2015
Location
Taylorsville, GA US
Fantasy
2342nd
9/15/2016 10:59am
The Rangers are great, but avoid the 3.0 if it has an automatic transmission. The 4.0 SOHC isn't the best engine, they had timing chain problems. The best combo is the 4 cyl and stick shift. They can carry a bike, the bed's aren't as wide as a full size truck. But they are 6' and plenty strong, they are legitimate trucks. There's no crew cabs in the US, you'd have to go to Mexico to get one. The extended cab is great as long as you don't have kids.
Check ball joints when buying. Check the axle tags, they came with anything from as awful as a 7.5 axle with 9" drums and 3:08 open gears to as great as a 8.8 axle with 10" drums and 4:56 limited slip gears. Fyi 4:56 only came on special fx4 editions. Expect to see mostly 4:10 and 3:73. Check for radiator leaks around the mounts. Lots of goodies from the explorer, and explorer sport trac swap in. Check explorerforum.com and therangerstation.com for write ups. Oh and check the fuel tank fill hose for leaks.
Avoid 2000, go with 2001+
Btw you can always get a motorcycle trailer for your car.
People like tacomas, but they're rusty and over priced. Only thing better about em than a ranger is their automatic transmission. The 5r55e has a bad reputation, but personally I got 18x,xxx miles out of mine. Broke it jumping the truck at a mud bog... and she still got me home. Just revving real high Grinning
motofool
Posts
236
Joined
12/19/2008
Location
Sioux City, IA US
Fantasy
2126th
9/15/2016 11:16am
I have an 03 2wd with 160,000 miles and it does just fine! i can fit both bikes and all my gear no problem. it also gets around in winter here in Iowa just fine.

1

The Shop

ThatOneKid
Posts
195
Joined
2/18/2016
Location
Royal Oak, MI US
9/15/2016 11:51am
There was never a Ford Ranger crew cab in the US market. There was a Ford "Explorer Sport Trac" crew cab, but it was not available...
There was never a Ford Ranger crew cab in the US market. There was a Ford "Explorer Sport Trac" crew cab, but it was not available with a 6' bed.
My bad I meant Supercab, I hear those words thrown around hundreds of times a day and of course said the wrong one.
de883zx
Posts
162
Joined
12/26/2013
Location
Howell, MI US
9/15/2016 11:53am
works for Martin brothers. Jeremy and Alex that is.
ThatOneKid
Posts
195
Joined
2/18/2016
Location
Royal Oak, MI US
9/15/2016 11:56am
colintrax wrote:
The Rangers are great, but avoid the 3.0 if it has an automatic transmission. The 4.0 SOHC isn't the best engine, they had timing chain problems...
The Rangers are great, but avoid the 3.0 if it has an automatic transmission. The 4.0 SOHC isn't the best engine, they had timing chain problems. The best combo is the 4 cyl and stick shift. They can carry a bike, the bed's aren't as wide as a full size truck. But they are 6' and plenty strong, they are legitimate trucks. There's no crew cabs in the US, you'd have to go to Mexico to get one. The extended cab is great as long as you don't have kids.
Check ball joints when buying. Check the axle tags, they came with anything from as awful as a 7.5 axle with 9" drums and 3:08 open gears to as great as a 8.8 axle with 10" drums and 4:56 limited slip gears. Fyi 4:56 only came on special fx4 editions. Expect to see mostly 4:10 and 3:73. Check for radiator leaks around the mounts. Lots of goodies from the explorer, and explorer sport trac swap in. Check explorerforum.com and therangerstation.com for write ups. Oh and check the fuel tank fill hose for leaks.
Avoid 2000, go with 2001+
Btw you can always get a motorcycle trailer for your car.
People like tacomas, but they're rusty and over priced. Only thing better about em than a ranger is their automatic transmission. The 5r55e has a bad reputation, but personally I got 18x,xxx miles out of mine. Broke it jumping the truck at a mud bog... and she still got me home. Just revving real high Grinning
Tons of great info here, thank you for the detailed write up. I would love to find an FX4 Level I or II but they are either hard to come by or come with a price premium. Unfortunately a trailer is not an option on my car as I have a Ford Focus ST which has a center mounted sport exhaust in the rear, aka no good place to have a hitch mounted. Also no kids so no issues with the small extended cab, i just want that over a single cab to have some more room to throw stuff in.
Rabbit
Posts
169
Joined
6/13/2009
Location
Chandler, AZ US
9/15/2016 11:58am
As for keeping the bed straight, you can't go wrong with a CCRSport Bed Buddy (www.ccrsport.com). I've had one in my '03 Tacoma from the start and my bed is still as straight as the day it come from the factory.
Panic_Rev
Posts
688
Joined
7/13/2012
Location
Fayetteville, AR US
9/15/2016 11:59am
I have a 2015 GMC Canyon and the mid size truck is perfect for what you just described. I know the 15 is larger than the years you are looking at, but I would include canyon/colorado in your search for a moto truck.
DA498
Posts
1571
Joined
10/11/2008
Location
Milliken, CO US
9/15/2016 12:02pm
Had 98 supercab , 4 cyl, auto. 2wd, Bed extender, worked fine. Xtra cab a must. There small. Even towed trailer with three bikes and gear and squeezed a guy in the xtra cab. Fun times. Ford Power!! Little weight in the back and it would be fine in the snow. Minnesota boy.
9/15/2016 12:15pm
I had a 99 Ranger super cab for a long 4.0 auto 2 wheel drive. I finally replaced it a few months ago but it had 240k miles. Started having to chase a check engine light but when I bought it, it had 148k.

Not my first Ranger my 92 also lasted a long time it was also a 4.0 2wd but both of them I had the transmission need to be rebuilt at around the 150k to 180k mark. The Mazda transmission seems to die around then. But otherwise they were pretty solid.
Samuel
Posts
388
Joined
6/30/2014
Location
Independence, OR US
9/15/2016 12:17pm
I've got one, actually it's a 2002 Mazda b2300, but it's the same as the ranger. I have the 2 wheel drive, 4 cyl, 5 speed manual extended cab. Works just fine as a moto hauler. I get 23-27 mpg depending on how I drive. It's my daily driver and has 160,000 miles. It's a little sluggish on the mountain passes. It's my 2nd ranger, last was a 1995 4x4 2.3. Sold it with 185,000 still going strong.
OR Racer46
Posts
1334
Joined
11/24/2014
Location
Eagle Point, OR US
Fantasy
876th
9/15/2016 12:20pm
I have a Tacoma and it's about the same size as a ranger and I have no problem
Hauling my bike or pulling a trailer

JM485
Posts
5405
Joined
10/1/2013
Location
Davis, CA US
9/15/2016 12:35pm Edited Date/Time 9/15/2016 12:36pm
I have an 86 Toyota so it's the same size truck you are looking at, and it works great for me. Here's a simple bed support I made to help hold the front wheels in place, it also doubles at a CB antenna holder for me. If you go with the mini truck I don't think you'll be disappointed, it's a great option when it comes to practicality.

Edit: Please ignore the crap welds, my welder was acting up and I needed to get it done.







731chopper
Posts
4080
Joined
1/2/2015
Location
DFW, TX US
Fantasy
442nd
9/15/2016 12:41pm
When buying an extended cab ranger I do believe it is necessary to get the truck in red.



9/15/2016 12:47pm
1998 S-10 SFI 4cyl 5 spd 2WD ext cab. Odometer LCD burned out at 305,000 miles, dove it another 5 years at least 30k a year. Never even had the valve cover off, regular stuff only. Put 450k to 500k on that thing easily and was a daily driver.
9/15/2016 12:56pm
Id reccomend a Colorado/Canyon before a Ranger. I dont personally have one (yet) but know a few buddies that do. Costs them $75 to fill it and can get 500-600kms to a tank.
The Sneak
Posts
169
Joined
2/24/2009
Location
US
9/15/2016 1:45pm Edited Date/Time 9/15/2016 1:47pm
Rangers are great little trucks, I own a 1994 3.0 XLT 5 spd 2wd that has been through hell and back. It is one of several vehicles (old 911 and mk7 VW GTI means the Ranger sleeps outside)
Simple and cheap to maintain - but partly because they are essentially 1983 designs.

No question that later Frontiers, Tacomas, Colorados etc outclass them, albeit at a premium price.
Modern trucks drive shockingly better, but then again if you are ok with it being a rougher ride and more bare bones there's a lot of value/$ with a Ranger.

I also use mine to tow a 22 ft Catalina sailboat (but not very far)
9/15/2016 2:02pm
You can fit a carrier to a car, unless it is a very small car
656mx
Posts
71
Joined
8/19/2016
Location
Hopewell Junction, NY US
9/15/2016 2:29pm
That would work fine. I did it with a Toyota for a few years. But the 4x4 ranger only gets 13mpg. I'd rather just get a full size truck. Same or better mpg when loaded, more power, and more room.
Samuel
Posts
388
Joined
6/30/2014
Location
Independence, OR US
9/15/2016 2:56pm
Id reccomend a Colorado/Canyon before a Ranger. I dont personally have one (yet) but know a few buddies that do. Costs them $75 to fill it...
Id reccomend a Colorado/Canyon before a Ranger. I dont personally have one (yet) but know a few buddies that do. Costs them $75 to fill it and can get 500-600kms to a tank.
That actually sounds really weak from my perspective. Cost to fill up and range are meaningless. Totally depends on where you live and size of tank. for example, I pay $35 to fill up and can go 600km. Gas is cheaper in the U.S., so $75 to fill up sounds really bad. Just use MPG or KPL, that's the ONLY valid measurement for fuel consumption. Not to mention the cost of a canyon/colorado is way higher.
Samuel
Posts
388
Joined
6/30/2014
Location
Independence, OR US
9/15/2016 2:58pm
656mx wrote:
That would work fine. I did it with a Toyota for a few years. But the 4x4 ranger only gets 13mpg. I'd rather just get a...
That would work fine. I did it with a Toyota for a few years. But the 4x4 ranger only gets 13mpg. I'd rather just get a full size truck. Same or better mpg when loaded, more power, and more room.
I guess you are referring to the 4.0 or 3.0? I had the 2.3 manual 4x4. 24 mpg very consistently in town and on highway, didn't seem to change much.
colintrax
Posts
4704
Joined
8/25/2015
Location
Taylorsville, GA US
Fantasy
2342nd
9/15/2016 3:09pm
656mx wrote:
That would work fine. I did it with a Toyota for a few years. But the 4x4 ranger only gets 13mpg. I'd rather just get a...
That would work fine. I did it with a Toyota for a few years. But the 4x4 ranger only gets 13mpg. I'd rather just get a full size truck. Same or better mpg when loaded, more power, and more room.
Samuel wrote:
I guess you are referring to the 4.0 or 3.0? I had the 2.3 manual 4x4. 24 mpg very consistently in town and on highway, didn't...
I guess you are referring to the 4.0 or 3.0? I had the 2.3 manual 4x4. 24 mpg very consistently in town and on highway, didn't seem to change much.
Yeah he's full of shit or talking about a truck with mechanical problems. My explorer gets 18mpg, with the 4.0 auto trans and big mud tires. My brothers ranger gets 20mpg with big AT tires 3.0 and automatic. My old ranger got 32mpg with the 4 cyl stick shift and tiny tires. 4wd only kills 2mpg or so.
colintrax
Posts
4704
Joined
8/25/2015
Location
Taylorsville, GA US
Fantasy
2342nd
9/15/2016 3:15pm
And anyone recommending a S10 obviously doesnt work on cars. That truck was one of the biggest piles to roll out of GM. It's like it was designed by 2 engineers, 1 trying to build a mini 1500, and the other trying to build a big aveo. Decent engine/transmission. But side view mirrors that break off over every speed bump. Drive shafts that break before the tires can break traction in gravel (traction control?) Door handles that break if you think of opening the door. Window motors that die every time it rains. But yeah, it'll start....
g0rd057
Posts
351
Joined
1/17/2011
Location
Central, FL US
9/15/2016 3:28pm
If you can wait a couple of years, the Ford Ranger is making a comeback.....
Radical
Posts
2280
Joined
10/20/2012
Location
San Diego, CA US
Fantasy
2360th
9/15/2016 5:14pm
I have 320k miles on my '93 Ranger with a 4.0.
The 4.0 DOHC engine (1993 - 2000) is great unless you get them hot.
They have 160 HP vs 205 for the 2001+, but are quite reliable.

Unfortunately mine overheated and it's time to retire it, or replace the engine with a used motor with fewer miles.

From what I've heard/read, the 4.0 V6 and the 4 cylinder engines are good. The early 3.0 V6's had issues.

Loading your bike diagonally like in the pictures above is the way to go since it doesn't compress the suspension, and the bike still can't go anywhere.

kevin204
Posts
4066
Joined
12/29/2006
Location
Ontario CA
Fantasy
2865th
9/15/2016 5:50pm
Surprised nobody has mentioned the Dakota. I have an '04 with the V8, 4x4 and 4-door/crew cab. Fantastic truck, perfect size for what I need.

Post a reply to: Older Ford Ranger as a Moto Truck

The Latest