Old Vs. New Unadilla

Anonymous (not verified)
Profile picture for user
Posts
0
Joined
5/10/2021
Anonymous (not verified)
Edited Date/Time 8/11/2017 9:48pm
With the added dirt and jumps, Unadilla seems like it's looking more like a modern MX track. I like the dirt, but I'm not sold on the jumps. I liked the old school feel of the place, and how it was always a nice departure from the rest of the series. It used to seem wider, and had tons of lines guys could take. Putting a bunch of man made obstacles into the place looks to have taken away some of the creativity guys can use. I remember Reynard taking insane lines on a super wide track to come from outside the top ten to beat RC, (who was comfortably in the lead for some time) in a 250 race. Maybe I'm just being nostalgic, but I like it better the old way.
|
kardy
Profile picture for user kardy
Posts
1229
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
Newport, OR US
kardy 8/14/2011 5:53pm
8/14/2011 5:53pm
Did it change from last year?
WhKnuckle
Profile picture for user WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
TX US
WhKnuckle 8/14/2011 5:54pm
8/14/2011 5:54pm
Anonymous wrote:
With the added dirt and jumps, Unadilla seems like it's looking more like a modern MX track. I like the dirt, but I'm not sold on...
With the added dirt and jumps, Unadilla seems like it's looking more like a modern MX track. I like the dirt, but I'm not sold on the jumps. I liked the old school feel of the place, and how it was always a nice departure from the rest of the series. It used to seem wider, and had tons of lines guys could take. Putting a bunch of man made obstacles into the place looks to have taken away some of the creativity guys can use. I remember Reynard taking insane lines on a super wide track to come from outside the top ten to beat RC, (who was comfortably in the lead for some time) in a 250 race. Maybe I'm just being nostalgic, but I like it better the old way.
I posted almost the same thing earlier. I'm with you on that. And in particular, I loved the old section after the skyshot where they'd drop down and make that big right hand sweeper back up the hill.
kardy
Profile picture for user kardy
Posts
1229
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
Newport, OR US
kardy 8/14/2011 5:58pm
8/14/2011 5:58pm
kardy wrote:
Did it change from last year?
Track and Trail wrote:
Not sure that it did, but the place has changed nonetheless.
All of the other tracks, the bikes, the riders and the sport has changed too. Why would 'Dilla be any different?

Although I do agree I'd rather see a fully naturalized track on the circuit too, just because it'd be different and cool.

The Shop

See All »
machine
Profile picture for user machine
Posts
6405
Joined
1/5/2011
Location
Collettsville, NC US
machine 8/14/2011 5:59pm
8/14/2011 5:59pm
I like the new layout. Modern bikes are capable of so much more now, why not let them ride a track that matches the bikes capabilities. Just my opinion of course.
Crossup
Profile picture for user Crossup
Posts
1557
Joined
12/13/2007
Location
Freetown, MA US
Crossup 8/14/2011 6:06pm
8/14/2011 6:06pm
Anonymous wrote:
With the added dirt and jumps, Unadilla seems like it's looking more like a modern MX track. I like the dirt, but I'm not sold on...
With the added dirt and jumps, Unadilla seems like it's looking more like a modern MX track. I like the dirt, but I'm not sold on the jumps. I liked the old school feel of the place, and how it was always a nice departure from the rest of the series. It used to seem wider, and had tons of lines guys could take. Putting a bunch of man made obstacles into the place looks to have taken away some of the creativity guys can use. I remember Reynard taking insane lines on a super wide track to come from outside the top ten to beat RC, (who was comfortably in the lead for some time) in a 250 race. Maybe I'm just being nostalgic, but I like it better the old way.
WhKnuckle wrote:
I posted almost the same thing earlier. I'm with you on that. And in particular, I loved the old section after the skyshot where they'd drop...
I posted almost the same thing earlier. I'm with you on that. And in particular, I loved the old section after the skyshot where they'd drop down and make that big right hand sweeper back up the hill.
I like the track with two exceptions; taking out the right hand uphill that you mentioned, and shortening the start. I miss that long start with the drop and rise before the first corner.

That said, the speed that these guys are doing is unbelievable.
redrider400
Profile picture for user redrider400
Posts
1536
Joined
1/18/2010
Location
Homer, AK US
redrider400 8/14/2011 6:06pm
8/14/2011 6:06pm
machine wrote:
I like the new layout. Modern bikes are capable of so much more now, why not let them ride a track that matches the bikes capabilities...
I like the new layout. Modern bikes are capable of so much more now, why not let them ride a track that matches the bikes capabilities. Just my opinion of course.
I agree. That and the fact that if there were no jumps, the 450's would be doing 85 mph on the straights. The bikes are so fast now that stuff has to be added to the track to slow them down.
WhKnuckle
Profile picture for user WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
TX US
WhKnuckle 8/14/2011 6:10pm
8/14/2011 6:10pm
machine wrote:
I like the new layout. Modern bikes are capable of so much more now, why not let them ride a track that matches the bikes capabilities...
I like the new layout. Modern bikes are capable of so much more now, why not let them ride a track that matches the bikes capabilities. Just my opinion of course.
redrider400 wrote:
I agree. That and the fact that if there were no jumps, the 450's would be doing 85 mph on the straights. The bikes are so...
I agree. That and the fact that if there were no jumps, the 450's would be doing 85 mph on the straights. The bikes are so fast now that stuff has to be added to the track to slow them down.
They used to race 500s there and everybody survived...
Switch
Profile picture for user Switch
Posts
1421
Joined
9/17/2010
Location
MP US
Switch 8/14/2011 6:31pm
8/14/2011 6:31pm
Track and Trail wrote:
My bad the RR Vs. RC battle was in the 125's in 1998. Awesome race for RR.
Insane corner speed. That was awesome, thanks for posting.
chrisbuehler
Profile picture for user chrisbuehler
Posts
3350
Joined
2/9/2009
Location
North Stonington, CT US
chrisbuehler 8/14/2011 6:31pm
8/14/2011 6:31pm
WhKnuckle wrote:
They used to race 500s there and everybody survived...
I see your point but whats faster RD on his Zook or a 86 CR500?
Track and Trail 8/14/2011 6:34pm
8/14/2011 6:34pm
kardy wrote:
Did it change from last year?
Track and Trail wrote:
Not sure that it did, but the place has changed nonetheless.
kardy wrote:
All of the other tracks, the bikes, the riders and the sport has changed too. Why would 'Dilla be any different? Although I do agree I'd...
All of the other tracks, the bikes, the riders and the sport has changed too. Why would 'Dilla be any different?

Although I do agree I'd rather see a fully naturalized track on the circuit too, just because it'd be different and cool.
I agree that we agree. Wink Also, as to why 'Dilla would be any different as far as progressing with the other tracks, I believe you gave a wonderful answer to that in your response.
Track and Trail 8/14/2011 6:45pm
8/14/2011 6:45pm
machine wrote:
I like the new layout. Modern bikes are capable of so much more now, why not let them ride a track that matches the bikes capabilities...
I like the new layout. Modern bikes are capable of so much more now, why not let them ride a track that matches the bikes capabilities. Just my opinion of course.
I actually like the new layout too. It reminds me of an epic video game track. It's disappointing that to get this sweet track they had to sacrifice the last of the old school tracks though.

As to the capabilities part, again there is a trade off being made. I feel we lose the creativity in line choice in return for the capability to do a huge sky shot.
PRM31
Profile picture for user PRM31
Posts
2136
Joined
8/7/2009
Location
Northern, VA US
PRM31 8/14/2011 7:04pm
8/14/2011 7:04pm
I DO NOT like how all the track are getting tilled up so deep prior to the race. Turns into a rut fest and all the tracks look the same.
machine
Profile picture for user machine
Posts
6405
Joined
1/5/2011
Location
Collettsville, NC US
machine 8/14/2011 7:09pm
8/14/2011 7:09pm
machine wrote:
I like the new layout. Modern bikes are capable of so much more now, why not let them ride a track that matches the bikes capabilities...
I like the new layout. Modern bikes are capable of so much more now, why not let them ride a track that matches the bikes capabilities. Just my opinion of course.
Track and Trail wrote:
I actually like the new layout too. It reminds me of an epic video game track. It's disappointing that to get this sweet track they had...
I actually like the new layout too. It reminds me of an epic video game track. It's disappointing that to get this sweet track they had to sacrifice the last of the old school tracks though.

As to the capabilities part, again there is a trade off being made. I feel we lose the creativity in line choice in return for the capability to do a huge sky shot.
I think PRM31's point about tracks getting tilled so deep contributes to the line choice thing more than anything. They often end up with one or two main ruts, that if they get out of them, they are screwed.
PRM31
Profile picture for user PRM31
Posts
2136
Joined
8/7/2009
Location
Northern, VA US
PRM31 8/14/2011 7:17pm
8/14/2011 7:17pm Edited Date/Time 8/14/2011 7:22pm
There has to be a reason behind the ridiculous tilling. It's a relatively new thing (I think) to till it really deep. Anyone know the impetus behind this? DC? Note the video above, the riders could go anywhere on the track, cut from one side to the other, etc, vice being stuck in a groove.
WhKnuckle
Profile picture for user WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
TX US
WhKnuckle 8/14/2011 7:44pm
8/14/2011 7:44pm
WhKnuckle wrote:
They used to race 500s there and everybody survived...
chrisbuehler wrote:
I see your point but whats faster RD on his Zook or a 86 CR500?
A 2001 500 is faster than a 2011 450 or 520; I'm sure a late-80s factory 500 was at least as fast as a 2011 factory 450. 500s could be tuned to deliver more power than anyone could use - the riders were the limiting factor, not the ability to make power. My stock 500AF is geared for 90 MPH+ and will out accelerate any normal four stroke if traction is not a limiting factor. And they raced those bikes on the old Unadilla layout for years. Modern chassis' will keep the wheels on the ground better than the old bikes, but the track doesn't look nearly as rough as it used to be, either. It's hard to say what the difference would be speed-wise.

I assume they've changed the layout more to make it modern than to slow the bikes down, but who knows? But it certainly is not the same natural layout that it was through the early 2000s. But it's not my track, the owners do what they want with it. The sport changes, and the tracks change, too.
WhKnuckle
Profile picture for user WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
TX US
WhKnuckle 8/14/2011 8:01pm
8/14/2011 8:01pm
PRM31 wrote:
I DO NOT like how all the track are getting tilled up so deep prior to the race. Turns into a rut fest and all the...
I DO NOT like how all the track are getting tilled up so deep prior to the race. Turns into a rut fest and all the tracks look the same.
Agreed. This is just getting ridiculous. It's one thing to make sure there's a cushion on the track, it's another to make it so deep the bikes get stuck in ruts.

Pit Row

See All »
wildbill
Profile picture for user wildbill
Posts
4358
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Christmas Valley, OR US
wildbill 8/14/2011 11:45pm
8/14/2011 11:45pm
WhKnuckle wrote:
They used to race 500s there and everybody survived...
chrisbuehler wrote:
I see your point but whats faster RD on his Zook or a 86 CR500?
WhKnuckle wrote:
A 2001 500 is faster than a 2011 450 or 520; I'm sure a late-80s factory 500 was at least as fast as a 2011 factory...
A 2001 500 is faster than a 2011 450 or 520; I'm sure a late-80s factory 500 was at least as fast as a 2011 factory 450. 500s could be tuned to deliver more power than anyone could use - the riders were the limiting factor, not the ability to make power. My stock 500AF is geared for 90 MPH+ and will out accelerate any normal four stroke if traction is not a limiting factor. And they raced those bikes on the old Unadilla layout for years. Modern chassis' will keep the wheels on the ground better than the old bikes, but the track doesn't look nearly as rough as it used to be, either. It's hard to say what the difference would be speed-wise.

I assume they've changed the layout more to make it modern than to slow the bikes down, but who knows? But it certainly is not the same natural layout that it was through the early 2000s. But it's not my track, the owners do what they want with it. The sport changes, and the tracks change, too.
and our old asses are stuck with memories of 70(+) hp 500's pinned to the stops. (I heard of euro works Honda getting 80 out of theirs)
Mod Killer
Profile picture for user Mod Killer
Posts
1829
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Worldwide, CA US
Mod Killer 8/15/2011 12:03am
8/15/2011 12:03am
chalk me up as another vote for the old 'dilla.
Arkmx
Profile picture for user Arkmx
Posts
1625
Joined
10/6/2006
Location
35 miles west of PHX..., AZ US
Arkmx 8/15/2011 6:11am
8/15/2011 6:11am
Mod Killer wrote:
chalk me up as another vote for the old 'dilla.
X2..!
Law 131
Profile picture for user Law 131
Posts
338
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NY US
Law 131 8/15/2011 6:56am
8/15/2011 6:56am
We have enough man made tracks.

I prefer to see the Unadilla pro course remain as natural terrain.
SCIENCE
Profile picture for user SCIENCE
Posts
311
Joined
11/13/2006
Location
Chester Springs, PA US
SCIENCE 8/15/2011 7:15am
8/15/2011 7:15am Edited Date/Time 8/15/2011 7:18am
machine wrote:
I like the new layout. Modern bikes are capable of so much more now, why not let them ride a track that matches the bikes capabilities...
I like the new layout. Modern bikes are capable of so much more now, why not let them ride a track that matches the bikes capabilities. Just my opinion of course.
redrider400 wrote:
I agree. That and the fact that if there were no jumps, the 450's would be doing 85 mph on the straights. The bikes are so...
I agree. That and the fact that if there were no jumps, the 450's would be doing 85 mph on the straights. The bikes are so fast now that stuff has to be added to the track to slow them down.
Today' riders are supposedly better conditioned, yet ride 10 minute shorter motos on bikes, that are mechanically superior (vs even the trickiest works bikes from years ago) on for the most part (hang town, Freestone, Red Bud were rough this year - assume south wick and pala maybe). smooth tracks with man made obstacles. Is it impressive what they do, yes. Does it compare to real MX, no. Unfortunately, my favorite track ever, has become an absolute shadow of it's former self. It is all dressed up nice, but is way too smooth and quickly becoming too littered with manmade obstacles. Who wants to bet there is at least one new one next year? Why not move the track one way or the other to find some virgin loam? Whoever thought it was a good idea to shorten an fill in the start lost his/ her marbles. Leave it natural. The options are endless, it just takes vision. The name remains, but the soul is gone.

Most have seen this video that DC linked on Racerhead. Who wouldn't want to see today's riders and machines find their way around the real Unadilla? I bet DeCoster just laughs when his or other riders pull off or are tired from their 35 minute motos! You can bet Hannah does! And maybe even Law131 - he raced the track in the video many times.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQyI8jt_Lag&feature=player_embedded#at=1…
Law 131
Profile picture for user Law 131
Posts
338
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NY US
Law 131 8/15/2011 7:29am
8/15/2011 7:29am
Hey Science,

Did you get to the race yesterday?

Thanks for that video.

I raced the 500's that day in 79.
raddad
Profile picture for user raddad
Posts
2287
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Wrenshall, MN US
raddad 8/15/2011 7:33am
8/15/2011 7:33am
PRM31 wrote:
I DO NOT like how all the track are getting tilled up so deep prior to the race. Turns into a rut fest and all the...
I DO NOT like how all the track are getting tilled up so deep prior to the race. Turns into a rut fest and all the tracks look the same.
WhKnuckle wrote:
Agreed. This is just getting ridiculous. It's one thing to make sure there's a cushion on the track, it's another to make it so deep the...
Agreed. This is just getting ridiculous. It's one thing to make sure there's a cushion on the track, it's another to make it so deep the bikes get stuck in ruts.
I think the "s" turns are a problem there and at a few other tracks also because of the deep tilling and watering. They all become one or two lined and the lappers can't get out of the way when the leaders come through, riders cannot "cross over" between lines or they highside. Plus when two or three riders are racing for position they all have to fall in single file instead of inside out moves in those sharp corners that would add to passing and excitement! Tilling holds water but at least leave some of the "s" turns less deep and just moist enough to hold down dust.

Another thing that made Dilla look bad this year was the bad camera angles, compare last year to this year and you can see how the track does not seem to have elevation any longer ie; the sky shot for one. I like a lot of the things they are doing with the tracks today and used to race those early 70's tracks so i can tell you first hand that i would hate it if they went back to the tracks we had to ride back then! Dilla and other natural tracks that had built in jumps etc plus some sand tracks around the world were good back in the day but let me tell you, you would not want to ride the majority of the old school tracks!
Stickers
Profile picture for user Stickers
Posts
101
Joined
4/12/2011
Location
AL US
Stickers 8/15/2011 7:38am
8/15/2011 7:38am
The new double going into the turn before you get to the section where Stewart and Rc hit sucked. It was much better when they went all the way up and dropped back in.
Law 131
Profile picture for user Law 131
Posts
338
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NY US
Law 131 8/15/2011 7:42am
8/15/2011 7:42am
I watched the first motos on Alli.

The Screw-U appears to be the only item left untouched from 79.

Gravity Cavity is very smooth compared to the rutted up mine field it was in 79.

The apple tree is still there. The switch backs through that section have been sanitized.

All this nostalgia about the old track notwithstanding, MX Sports did an A+ job putting on this years event.

Congrats!
Deployer78
Profile picture for user Deployer78
Posts
105
Joined
11/3/2009
Location
Binghamton, NY US
Deployer78 8/15/2011 10:52am
8/15/2011 10:52am
Stickers wrote:
The new double going into the turn before you get to the section where Stewart and Rc hit sucked. It was much better when they went...
The new double going into the turn before you get to the section where Stewart and Rc hit sucked. It was much better when they went all the way up and dropped back in.
I agree with you 100% Stickers. I understand that they are actually trying to slow down the speeds on the track by adding jumps and turns, but whoever the track designer is at Dilla has mad some bad decisions. That stupid double that everybody was slamming into the face(before the old Stewart/RC hill turn) was a terrible idea. "Ummm we need to slow the speeds down, lets build a double that everybody cases every lap". Dumb and unsafe. Even the double going up the old Elevator shaft looked like a really hard, un-necessary landing. The new step-up heading towards the start had a crazy buck at the top. I think when it was built they didn't pack in the top of the lip. I love Dilla(especially since Broome-Tioga doesn't have a national anymore) but some of the track changes they are making are not good. There are better/safer ways to slow up track speeds other than slamming into the face of a double.
peelout
Profile picture for user peelout
Posts
17867
Joined
1/6/2011
Location
Ogden, UT US
peelout 8/15/2011 11:03am
8/15/2011 11:03am
i thought the track looked Rad this year.

RV made that track his bitch!
Stickers
Profile picture for user Stickers
Posts
101
Joined
4/12/2011
Location
AL US
Stickers 8/15/2011 12:34pm
8/15/2011 12:34pm
Deployer78 wrote:
I agree with you 100% Stickers. I understand that they are actually trying to slow down the speeds on the track by adding jumps and turns...
I agree with you 100% Stickers. I understand that they are actually trying to slow down the speeds on the track by adding jumps and turns, but whoever the track designer is at Dilla has mad some bad decisions. That stupid double that everybody was slamming into the face(before the old Stewart/RC hill turn) was a terrible idea. "Ummm we need to slow the speeds down, lets build a double that everybody cases every lap". Dumb and unsafe. Even the double going up the old Elevator shaft looked like a really hard, un-necessary landing. The new step-up heading towards the start had a crazy buck at the top. I think when it was built they didn't pack in the top of the lip. I love Dilla(especially since Broome-Tioga doesn't have a national anymore) but some of the track changes they are making are not good. There are better/safer ways to slow up track speeds other than slamming into the face of a double.
Bogle looked pretty good each time they showed him. It was rough watching the guys slam into it each lap. Rest of the track looked good. What did any riders have to say about it?

Post a reply to: Old Vs. New Unadilla