Posts
290
Joined
9/19/2019
Location
Duluth, MN
US
Edited Date/Time
11/2/2019 12:56pm
Good read for those that think Nitrogen is a panacea for their tires or shocks. Fun test performed..
https://powertank.com/pages/nitrogen-truths-and-myths
https://powertank.com/pages/nitrogen-truths-and-myths
Some suspension companies say they use Nitrogen because it expands at a constant rate or doesn't aerate the oil. A more real world use for suspension would be because Nitrogen is an inert gas and is oxygen free, it is impossible for oxidation or corrosion to occur. Without the presence of oxygen (The 'O' in 'H2O'), water or condensation cannot form inside your forks or shock, hence a corrosion or oxidation free air chamber. (This factors into the "dry" gas concept.)
The Shop
You cannot, however, get away with using normal compressed air in a rear shock bladder. You have to use Nitrogen. That thing is moving a lot, sometimes very, very quickly. Nitrogen can be compressed under these conditions, repeatedly, over and over again without creating any moisture in the process. Normal air cannot.
Argon might also work but it's more expensive than nitrogen, which is probably why it's not used. I know some off-road guys have used argon in their truck suspension since they have tanks of argon for their welders sitting by. Expensive but the principal is the same - inert, highly compressible gas that is not susceptible to moisture build-up and handles heat really well.
Tires are a completely different thing all together. Tires aren't under-going the same conditions as suspension where compressibility is a primary consideration. Tires are moving but at no point are the molecules of air in a tire undergoing extreme compressive forces, where the characteristics of a gas like nitrogen would be beneficial.
Putting nitrogen in a tire and thinking it's doing anything beneficial is simply foolish.
Nitrogen in the tires of my wife's Odyssey, which the dealer wanted to charge $50 as an upgrade, I don't think so.
It's fine that he chose to use a metal container to eliminate permeability and to test the ideal gas law, but he should have also then testing in a rubber tube or tire after proving that the gas's rise and fall in pressure with temperature the same.
Also, nitration is a thing, so inert......not so much.
The large nitrogen bottles were easy to carry on the trucks, would last a long time, and was great for running the occasional air tool.
Do not know why you would (want to) use compressed ambient air over nitrogen for suspension.
Plus, if you use Helium I hear you jump farther...
Pit Row
Edit: Before I get ripped apart for the inaccuracy of that comment, it could technically be true, but which gas you use to inflate tires has absolutely no measurable effect on fuel economy.
I like this one: Jalopnik Article
Really enjoyed the 30 different reasons people think Nitrogen will make them faster when on a shock dyno you CANT see any discernible difference in compressed air, Argon, or Nitrogen 😂
Shock bladders hold a TINY amount of volume. It's not a car tire that one can check, check and recheck with very littl loss in total volume.
Edit:
Oxygen is heavier than nitrogen, but slightly smaller. Still It's so close that it doesn't really matter. Air forks come with bicycle shock pumps, not nitrogen regulators.
Post a reply to: Nitrogen myths