Posts
1448
Joined
10/27/2009
Location
Menifee, CA
US
I dont know if this has been covered before, but why is that the national tracks get very minimal changes over the years? Why dont they get complete redisgned tracks every year like supercross? It seems like some of these tracks have the exact same design for mulitple years save for maybe taking out or adding a double here and there.
And different types of Dirt
Im really happy to see
We got a good Sand track back on the schedule.
I wish they would run the Tracks in Reverse
Some years that would change it up a Bit
The Shop
Id love to go in person
Ive never been to that 1
Small changes can be adapted to easily. But massive changes are not welcomed. Sometimes tracks add a section that would need an extra camera or two, which seems simple, but that means another camera operator, another lift, another thousand feet of cable or so. All of that is extra cost.
Also for tracks that have permanent spectator fencing it would be a huge cost increase to move the fencing around.
Also the Kawasaki track map would be wayyyyyyy off. Lol
The amount of work it takes to put on one is just huge.
The tv production has to be a nightmare of wires,guys on sissor lifts all day.
The amount of flat ground needed to set up all the pits and midway.
Even just adding a small new section is significant work. You have to remember that for insurance reasons, all of the track has to be fenced off. Lanes have to be made for water truck access and it also has to be serviceable for the tillage equipment. In addition, you have to keep it as spectator friendly as possible while ensuring lap times are acceptable to the schedules.
And don't forget most of the tracks on the schedule race all season
Pit Row
Changing locations each year would be a hard sell as well. I remember Glen Helen went off the schedule in 2010 because they were only offered a one-year deal but wanted a multiple-year contract to guarantee they would have a national for years to come. Why sink in $500,000 into facility operations/renovations when you might not get a national the next year?
Ditch Muddy Creek and bring back Steel City. I'd be happy with those tracks for the next 10 years. The history behind the tracks is part of what makes the Nationals so cool. Be careful what you wish for. Could end up with a bunch of shit tracks like Qatar.
But the biggest thing for me is the lack of diversity when it comes to the surfaces. There are so many different surfaces in the GPs and that is a huge factor when it comes to tire choices and results. The US national tracks are almost like carbon copies of each other and that equals that roughly the same riders will win and be in the top 5. Southwick coming back is really good since it will be the only "sand" race.
Would think the nationals tracks would be able to change it up, the outspoken riders like Reed agree that the tracks are stale and they haven't been doing much to change them year to year
Post a reply to: National tracks.