Gosh who would have thought? They seem like such an ethical bunch
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/monster-energy-lawsuits_us_5a6280c1e4b002283002ca27?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
Gosh who would have thought? They seem like such an ethical bunch
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/monster-energy-lawsuits_us_5a6280c1e4b002283002ca27?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
rosebud441 wrote:So typical to attack the source.. cmon, you can do better
Huffington is as fake news as cnn and the onion
2009 Kawasaki KX450F
2009 Kawasaki KX250F
2002 Suzuki GSXR 600
Edited Date/Time:
Monster isn't a small company. I'm sure they've got their fair share of HR nightmares.
Nobody ever told me, I found out for myself. You've got to believe in foolish miracles. It's not how you play the game, it's if you win or lose. You can choose. Don't confuse. Win or lose. It's up to you!
rosebud441 wrote:So typical to attack the source.. cmon, you can do better
Acidreamer wrote:Huffington is as fake news as cnn and the onion
*cough* Faux News, Info Wars, Breitbart *cough*
Edited Date/Time:
Sounds about right:
“I thought, ‘This guy is like Prince Charming,’” she said, perched on a black leather couch below the print Hamilton bought her, a playful piece depicting Queen Elizabeth blowing a bubble. “I fell in love.”
What did she say she did there again?
Let’s be honest, the Monster girls likely have a zillion “me-too” moments.
Im not sure how you judge their situation. They’re glorified strippers. Daddy issues galore. Do they have rights? Sure. Are they exploited? Willingly.
I have a daughter. There’s a few key points Im gonna drill into her head when she’s old enough:
1. Wave fresh meat in a starving dogs face, expect to get bit
2. She’s getting MMA lessons from a VERY early age so that in the event some douche tries to take advantage she’s able to fuck him up
3. Some of these “me too” moments are just buyers remorse. If we didnt sexually repress women in this society, sex wouldnt be some mental block. There is no reason we cant expect women to responsibly enjoy sex so they dont need to be pressured into doing something both parties should enjoy doing.
Part of Speech: Noun
Definition: A loser, poser, lame-ass. One who talks the talk, but could never walk the walk.
One who talks shit and doesn't back it up, but rather ends up eating their shit in return. A fuckin 'tard.
Usage: Slang
Edited Date/Time:
Aceofspades wrote:#metoo is 2% actual victims and 98% money grabs and revenge .
And 75% of statistics in Vital MX threads are made up on the spot.*
(*Margin of error, 25%)
Aceofspades wrote:#metoo is 2% actual victims and 98% money grabs and revenge .
Gonna need to see some sources on that
Ghost of Jabroni wrote:Let’s be honest, the Monster girls likely have a zillion “me-too” moments.
Im not sure how you judge their situation. They’ ...more
I don't think these 6 women who worked at Monster were Monster Girls at a Supercross event....
??
"What happens to your hands when you crash?"
"I put my hands up real quick to protect my sunglasses"
Edited Date/Time:
The huff, what a garbage...
Women readily accept new ideas because they are ignorant; they spread them easily, because they are light; they support them a long time, because they are stubborn.
Dominants understood it well...
Women's, the problem is elsewhere...
Aceofspades wrote:#metoo is 2% actual victims and 98% money grabs and revenge .
Source?
Just a nobody who never was anybody.
Huffingtonpost.. hahaha
Next up, Alex Jones of Infowars and Howard Stern collaborate to bring us a story about how Monster Energy is pumping high levels of papaya juice and milk into potential future employees to help naturally enlarge their breasts... SMH...
Edited Date/Time:
Donovan759 wrote:Huffingtonpost.. hahaha
Next up, Alex Jones of Infowars and Howard Stern collaborate to bring us a story about how Monster ...more
http://www.businessinsider.com/women-file-lawsuit-against-monster-energy-2018-1
Better?
Just a nobody who never was anybody.
Actually, no... not better. This article quotes the Huff more than it gives new information.
I did thoroughly enjoy the pun. And you're right, I'm killing the messenger while dismissing the message and that's not cool. Anyone being mistreated to that degree deserves justice and should be heard.
So, you think it's implausible, considering Monster's use of women in their event marketing?
You also think that just because you dislike the messenger, the message is false
Then you think that even when followed up on by Business Insider, Monster declined comment, even a denial, is irrelevant? Now, you could say they refused comment because they don't comment about ongoing litigation, but then that proves there then is indeed, litigation, correct? If there was no litigation, why would they not vigorously state there is no such litigation?
Lastly, again because you don't like the messenger, you think they'd risk a defamation or slander suit, when one could easily go to the clerk of courts and review, either in its entirety or in abbreviation, the validity of such a suit's existence? To what gain?
Just a nobody who never was anybody.
^ I didn't say it was implausible. And my second "paragraph" wasn't sarcasm. It truly is tragic if these girls are being treated that way... I actually meant that you were right. It was wrong of me to dismiss the message that way.
Just a nobody who never was anybody.
Donovan759 wrote:^ I didn't say it was implausible. And my second "paragraph" wasn't sarcasm. It truly is tragic if these girls are being ...more
Ok
Just a nobody who never was anybody.
Interesting read, but took most of it with a grain of salt. Wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the allegations were true. But also wouldn’t be surprised at all if a bunch of it was exaggerated and taken out of context to paint a very different picture.
It probably is ran like a “boys club” and would be tough to work there if you were an average to uptight woman. At least that’s what I’d expect going into most jobs at that company. Not much different than companies or workplaces that are predominantly women run and have the repercussions of that dynamic.
rosebud441 wrote:So typical to attack the source.. cmon, you can do better
It's what happens when objectification truly becomes normalized.
So if I have this right, the one gal had no issues with business mixing with pleasure (two promotions) until it wasn’t going her way (fired/breakup)? Got it.
Edited Date/Time:
What? Dave putting words into other people’s mouths? Oh the tragedy!
My defense if I was named in that lawsuit would be that I drank to many Monsters and they messed me up then counter sue Monster, the aluminum company that supplies the cans materials, the label company for making it so appealing, the caffeine supplier, machine company that supplies the machines to package the product and so on since they are all obviously complicit in my derangement now......I didn’t used to be this way before working there!