Posts
1102
Joined
10/10/2012
Location
Spring, TX
US
Edited Date/Time
8/5/2019 4:01am
Man this guy is unbelievable.. What ex-pro would you like to see duke it out with Brownie next yr at the Ranch? The Moto today in +25 w/Durham was awesome!
The Shop
Mike Brown is 47 years old and hasn't been a pro for a long time. The idea that "once you're a pro, always a pro" is an outdated Olympic idea. What makes you a pro is having an active AMA Pro license, and neither Brown nor Durham have that active license, nor do John Grewe, Earl May, Barry Carsten, etc...
But they are limited to riding in the Junior +25, Senior +40 or Masters +50. The Vet +30 class and the Senior +45 classes are for Sportsmen who have never scored points in an AMA Pro National or AMA Supercross.
Just because a guy wants to continue racing after he is no longer a pro doesn't mean he's still a pro. And just because Mike Brown is faster than every other 47-year-old on the planet doesn't make him a pro either. The fact that he's battling to win the +25 class against much younger competition is pretty damn cool.
DC
Racer X
If you're an under 30 non pro you can race B class, C class or college. If you're over 30 non pro you can race the 30+ sportsman or 45+ sportsman.
Who exactly is he hurting by racing at this event?Other than the feelings of a few 28 year old a grade riders who are getting beat by someone almost twice their age. There are plenty of classes for people who want a trophy but want to dodge the fast guys.
I would literally hitch hike to the ranch (if that's what it took) to see Stew race again.
They’ve tweaked the classes every viable way possible....keeping out anyone who had a pro license....keeping out anyone who ever scored points....yet some of you guys will just moan.
Somebody has to win.
Pit Row
Then again, I want to see guys like RC and Mike Brown continue racing. What else are they going to do, hang up the boots?
Respect to the old pros though, they are pretty damn fast.
Mike Brown and I have these things in common:
1. Don't hold a pro license (tough to be called a pro when by the very definition of the AMA you're not)
2. Don't race full time.
3. Don't get paid to race. (Mike's not getting paid to go to LL)
4. Both of us were pro (me, uh about 35 years ago and no, never scored a point)
Just because someone is faster than you doesn't mean they shouldnt race.
While I agree Brown is a Pro but non Card holder Pro, He is within the rules.
ANNNNDDDD- before anyone else can say it, yes. I am equally dumb for commenting.
If you boot Browny from 40+ and John Grewe/Barry Carsten win, why shouldnt the guy who's never scored a pro point who finishes third complain about their status and get them booted out, after all they had their time in the sun in the 80's/90's
What about the independently wealthy guy who's retired and doesnt have to report to a 9-5 but wins the 45+ sportsman over the plumber or candlestick maker who finishes second, should he protest about not having enough time to prepare?
Post a reply to: Mike Brown @ LL