It sure looked like RV jumped on RED

kongols wrote:

If Stewart did this there would be 20 threads about what a danger he is on a track. Fucking hypocrites.

kongols wrote:

If Stewart did this there would be 20 threads about what a danger he is on a track. Fucking hypocrites.

BR_HERO wrote:

You mad?

Franklin Bluth wrote:

Totally uncalled for ...

MX455 wrote:

.....but very true. Just because you don't like the sound of something doesn't mean it isn't true.

Franklin Bluth wrote:

So would it be racist or would it be because so many don't like JS as a person? I mean think about it for a sec...

So would it be racist or would it be because so many don't like JS as a person? I mean think about it for a sec, so everyone would pile on JS if he did what RV did because JS is black?! That's ridiculous and illogical.

mxr300ex wrote:

Yellow flag means jump!!!

kongols wrote:

Red light means stop. Red lights were after yellow flag.

mxr300ex wrote:

Should have been a red cross flag. He must have been looking at the flagger and not the lights.

MX455 wrote:

No one knows until everyone stops with racism. Were you at southwick a few years ago?? I was and it made me sick trying to explain...

No one knows until everyone stops with racism. Were you at southwick a few years ago?? I was and it made me sick trying to explain what the "N" word was to my 8 yr old. So until that stops you can't disprove it.

kongols wrote:

Red light means stop. Red lights were after yellow flag.

mxr300ex wrote:

Should have been a red cross flag. He must have been looking at the flagger and not the lights.

jbomx363 wrote:

It says a white flag with red cross may be displayed OR red flashing lights are displayed. He jumped on red..doesnt matter how the red was...

It says a white flag with red cross may be displayed OR red flashing lights are displayed. He jumped on red..doesnt matter how the red was displayed. Not that any of this matters anymore.

MX455 wrote:

.....but very true. Just because you don't like the sound of something doesn't mean it isn't true.

Franklin Bluth wrote:

So would it be racist or would it be because so many don't like JS as a person? I mean think about it for a sec...

So would it be racist or would it be because so many don't like JS as a person? I mean think about it for a sec, so everyone would pile on JS if he did what RV did because JS is black?! That's ridiculous and illogical.

MX455 wrote:

No one knows until everyone stops with racism. Were you at southwick a few years ago?? I was and it made me sick trying to explain...

No one knows until everyone stops with racism. Were you at southwick a few years ago?? I was and it made me sick trying to explain what the "N" word was to my 8 yr old. So until that stops you can't disprove it.

kongols wrote:

Red light means stop. Red lights were after yellow flag.

mxr300ex wrote:

Should have been a red cross flag. He must have been looking at the flagger and not the lights.

jbomx363 wrote:

It says a white flag with red cross may be displayed OR red flashing lights are displayed. He jumped on red..doesnt matter how the red was...

It says a white flag with red cross may be displayed OR red flashing lights are displayed. He jumped on red..doesnt matter how the red was displayed. Not that any of this matters anymore.

MX455 wrote:

.....but very true. Just because you don't like the sound of something doesn't mean it isn't true.

Franklin Bluth wrote:

So would it be racist or would it be because so many don't like JS as a person? I mean think about it for a sec...

So would it be racist or would it be because so many don't like JS as a person? I mean think about it for a sec, so everyone would pile on JS if he did what RV did because JS is black?! That's ridiculous and illogical.

MX455 wrote:

No one knows until everyone stops with racism. Were you at southwick a few years ago?? I was and it made me sick trying to explain...

No one knows until everyone stops with racism. Were you at southwick a few years ago?? I was and it made me sick trying to explain what the "N" word was to my 8 yr old. So until that stops you can't disprove it.

MX455 wrote:

For all of you saying they were yellow and "turned" red your wrong. The first set blinks yellow indicating that the red light are on on...

For all of you saying they were yellow and "turned" red your wrong. The first set blinks yellow indicating that the red light are on on the triple. That way you can't claim you were already committed.

mxr300ex wrote:

Should have been a red cross flag. He must have been looking at the flagger and not the lights.

jbomx363 wrote:

It says a white flag with red cross may be displayed OR red flashing lights are displayed. He jumped on red..doesnt matter how the red was...

It says a white flag with red cross may be displayed OR red flashing lights are displayed. He jumped on red..doesnt matter how the red was displayed. Not that any of this matters anymore.

mxr300ex wrote:

The point is they shouldn't display a flag that says jump and a light that says don't at the same time.

mxr300ex wrote:

Should have been a red cross flag. He must have been looking at the flagger and not the lights.

jbomx363 wrote:

It says a white flag with red cross may be displayed OR red flashing lights are displayed. He jumped on red..doesnt matter how the red was...

It says a white flag with red cross may be displayed OR red flashing lights are displayed. He jumped on red..doesnt matter how the red was displayed. Not that any of this matters anymore.

kongols wrote:

3. White Flag with Red Cross: In Supercross this flag or a red flashing light may be displayed at the beginning of a triple jump or...

3. White Flag with Red Cross:
In Supercross this flag or a red flashing light may be
displayed at the beginning of a triple jump or a series of
jumps. The riders must roll each jump individually with no
passing and exercise extreme caution until they are past the
area of concern.

500guy wrote:

Looked very clear the lights were flashing before he went around the corner.

Cost James big time

mxr300ex wrote:

If this was Stewart we were talking about I would agree with you. It wasn't though, it was the NFMOTP "new fastest man on the planet"...

If this was Stewart we were talking about I would agree with you. It wasn't though, it was the NFMOTP "new fastest man on the planet" so he gets a pass.

mx 219 wrote:

Hippy and the hick said there were a bunch of racist bastards in the industry that call Stewart the "N" word. Now, I know we dont...

Hippy and the hick said there were a bunch of racist bastards in the industry that call Stewart the "N" word. Now, I know we dont like to discuss hippy and the hick without trying to slam them, but I agree with you and I can believe what H&H say.

trwright3 wrote:

I'm with kongols. Complete bull. And for Mr.frank you are a complete idiot if you don't think people judge based on Color. I'm not saying your...

I'm with kongols. Complete bull. And for Mr.frank you are a complete idiot if you don't think people judge based on Color. I'm not saying your a racist but there are people out there that are.

kongols wrote:

If Stewart did this there would be 20 threads about what a danger he is on a track. Fucking hypocrites.

BR_HERO wrote:

You mad?

Franklin Bluth wrote:

Fair enough but the person who posted that message just incited something that was totally unnecessary for this thread. That's why I wrote that it was...

Fair enough but the person who posted that message just incited something that was totally unnecessary for this thread. That's why I wrote that it was uncalled for. No one was talking about JS.

I was at Unadilla for the only outdoor race JS rode that year (2010). I heard all that nonsense too and I had taken my son. I guess for me I just don't see the connection to what that poster wrote and the discussion going on in this thread concerning an incident with RV.

DavidR wrote:

Mookie carted huge and then misses the LCQ because his Kant Take Much won't start and James finishes 3rd without crashing. So, yeah, he's mad.

jbomx363 wrote:

It says a white flag with red cross may be displayed OR red flashing lights are displayed. He jumped on red..doesnt matter how the red was...

It says a white flag with red cross may be displayed OR red flashing lights are displayed. He jumped on red..doesnt matter how the red was displayed. Not that any of this matters anymore.

mxr300ex wrote:

The point is they shouldn't display a flag that says jump and a light that says don't at the same time.

kongols wrote:

No, yellow flag was a caution that there is hazard in front and he should`ve looked at the red light !!!

DavidR wrote:

Mookie carted huge and then misses the LCQ because his Kant Take Much won't start and James finishes 3rd without crashing. So, yeah, he's mad.

kongols wrote:

I`m not that big of a Mookie fan. Roczen is more like it.

Outsider wrote:

There was a yellow flag and yellow lights in the corner right before the jump which was right out of that corner. Seems contradictory to have...

There was a yellow flag and yellow lights in the corner right before the jump which was right out of that corner. Seems contradictory to have those two things only a few feet from the triple and then expect a guy to hit the brakes on the face of the triple after turning and having red lights.... no time figure out what's going on. Should have been red cross flags in the corner.

Outsider wrote:

There was a yellow flag and yellow lights in the corner right before the jump which was right out of that corner. Seems contradictory to have...

There was a yellow flag and yellow lights in the corner right before the jump which was right out of that corner. Seems contradictory to have those two things only a few feet from the triple and then expect a guy to hit the brakes on the face of the triple after turning and having red lights.... no time figure out what's going on. Should have been red cross flags in the corner.

Outsider wrote:

There was a yellow flag and yellow lights in the corner right before the jump which was right out of that corner. Seems contradictory to have...

There was a yellow flag and yellow lights in the corner right before the jump which was right out of that corner. Seems contradictory to have those two things only a few feet from the triple and then expect a guy to hit the brakes on the face of the triple after turning and having red lights.... no time figure out what's going on. Should have been red cross flags in the corner.

pilotdude wrote:

Agree.