Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
Edit: You don't need to stick up for him. I'm simply stating he's not better than Marvin. Not like I'm trying to take a jab at him.
dude , scroll up a bit ...its about SX
and you were wrong once again with your statement about SX wins ...lol
not the first time ..
have a nice day , nice try
The Shop
N.B. If you think thats 'striking distance', Roger D wants a word with you- he's going to offer you a contract! :-)
The picture you are using is a great example of the ebb and flow of the gap during a lap. Anderson has already accelerated after the turn, but Herlings has just probably finished his braking and is likely just about to begin his own acceleration. The next decent corner will see Anderson hit the brakes first, and Herlings will cut that gap back down.
RD may never offer me a contract, but I'll bet that he'd never offer one to any racer that didn't consider the gap in your photo as within striking distance. Any top racer who considered that gap to be outside of striking distance probably doesn't have the competitive mindset that RD would require.......
Jason--1 Marvin--0
Also, Jason has been hurt outdoors for a while or he would have some outdoor wins I am sure.
Literally the same thing between tomac marv and anderson. Its not even an argument. Its pure fact.
"ebb & flow" applies, yes, but the fact of the matter is, at THIS very point on the track, ten (or so) minutes later in the race, JH rode down here RIGHT. ON. HIS. WHEEL. So the gap, no matter the 'ebb & flow' was made up. Ebb & Flow means zilch. Gap in seconds means everything.
A far cry from the "Ando was the fastest guy that day" quote you will find elsewhere in this thread.
Pit Row
You, Douche Pont...
Bitter much?
While we're here...Kenny and Eli DO Smoke! They shred and they win. They look awfully damn good doing it, too.
But, let's get back to your Bitchey little whine-fest about Jason:
1. Yes, Princess, he does seem to have a beef with Steve. So, what? That ruffles your feathers?
2. Genuinely Boring? Bwahahahahaha. Dude, you just gave me a new definition for guys like you: "Drive-by fans".
3. Thanks for the laughs. Love the pic in your Avi, btw. Old Honda's rule...almost as much as old Maicos and Bultacos.
Signed,
An Old Dude that actually rides.
To your points....
1) A lot of talk about professionalism and growing the sport. I think its incredibly small time for a reigning SX champion to blackball a prominent journalist and media outlet. Steve or otherwise.
2) I think if I was a drive by fan Id actually like him more. Ive been actively following SX for over 30 years. I just dont like his style. Just like you dont like mine. He takes unnecessary shots at other riders and he just seems like a bit of a robot. He will never be a McGrath or a Stew or an RJ, annd the question was "is he they guy we need?" The OP asked a question and I gave my opinion.
3) The old Honda pic is current BTW, not one from the good old days. I also race race modern on a modern bike. Not that my racing resume is required for me to have an opinion on this topic....but I had north of 60 gate drops this year.
You, sir, are a dude.
I’d like to have a beer and maybe introduce ya to a few guys that ride.
Seattle or sooner? Assuming you do go to a Supercross now and then...?
I agree Andersen is a little boring on camera. I doubt he will be in a suit at A1 press conference. He’s not boring during the race though.
The truth is the USA is fresh out of superstars for the first time in a long time and I don’t see any obvious ones on the horizen.
450 Title counts?
Number of years in big boy class?
Anderson is better, titles don't lie.
Post a reply to: Is Ando the rider we need?