Posts
9806
Joined
4/13/2010
Location
Lake Geneva, WI
US
Edited Date/Time
4/15/2022 10:46am
I see them for pretty cheap. I know they ran hot but were they really as bad as some say ?
One thing you have to look out for is the clutch...if you run a cheapo clutch, you'll likely pack up the oil pickups and roach the top end of the motor....I know...happened to me. Tusk clutch and big bore kit didn't work well together...after the motor locked up, I tore it down and the top end oi pickup looked like a cat hacked up a hairball on it
Sean K
The Shop
Also had an '06 kx250f that I picked up for $800 of craigslist. Bike had almost any type of aftermarket parts you could think of (big bore, excel rims, etc.) Rode the bike hard for about 6 months, never thouched anything on it and it ran great. Ended up selling it for $3300 in 2011 (it had to go when I got an offer like that!)
Overall, I love the power/handling of both bikes, but I wouldn't go with a 4 stroke any older than '06.
I had an '04 YZ250F that was like riding a witch doctor's horse. You had to make sure the planets were aligned, wear a necklace made from the bones of a chicken, sacrifice a goat and kick it 10 times to get it to fire up - hot or cold. And that bike was 10X more reliable than an RMz/KXf.
Sean K
Can anyone recommended a good year reliability wise?? Any brand.
Pit Row
By the time you spend your money fixing them you could buy a later model.
If you're on a budget go 06 or newer. I had an 06 Kaw 250f and it was very a solid bike. 100 times better than the 05.
Post a reply to: How bad was the 04 RMZ/KX 250f really ?