Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
The MXdN is a team event...luck plays a much larger roll in that event than in a regular race. Now many years did a crash or mechanical cost USA the victories? How many of USA's victories were because of a crash/mechanical from one of the other countries? My only point is that its impossible to compare the two series based on the MXdN...
More guys battling for wins doesn't mean anything either...when I race my buddies...we battle HARD! Banging each other, passing each other, etc. etc. It's great racing...but it doesn't mean we are going fast. So a lot of guys battling for wins doesn't mean the competition is stacked...it just means there are a lot of guys going about the same speed (even if that speed is slow, like me and my buddies).
My buddies and me race each other hard too...and I've seen guys battle each other hard (lots of passes, bouncing off each other, etc.) in the D class...they aren't all that great of riders, and they certainly aren't going fast...So "hard" racing doesn't mean better riders or more depth.
And people say that the GP riders look like they are going faster on TV or even in person...this argument is worthless because they aren't on the track at the same time. And its all a matter of perception.
So I guess, I'm not convinced that the GP's have closed the gap on the AMA series (if there was ever even a gap to begin with-in modern times at least) and I think a lot of the arguments that support that don't hold any water. Maybe they have...I don't know...but the only true way to tell would be to have multiple rounds of each series over lap, on different types of tracks, and see who comes out on top.
I'm not making an argument one way or the other...just asking the question.
I will say this though...MXGP is a lot more fun to watch this summer than the 450 nationals...and the 250 nationals are more fun to watch than MX2.
Depth in mx2 is fine
The Shop
I'm a fan of great riders racing on tough tracks. So no complaints here. Nothing but appreciation.
I remember Herlings saying how good of a rider Tomac is and also complimenting Webb on the 250. Cairoli has mentioned several times how fast the Americans are.
I also remember Adam Cianciarulo, Ryan Dungey, Tomac, webb etc complimenting Herlings, ac222 and Febvre.
The last few years it seems like the AMA tracks are absolutely brutal for the most part, ripping it too deep in the beginning and leaving it all day. It turns into RUTOCROSS. The racing was better when they prepped between motos instead of it being like slot car racing.
Some of the tracks are still prepped correct and dont get too rutted. Washougal was good, so was Red Bud and Glen Helen. I couldnt stand watching hangtown or lakewood.
This is all my opinion!!!
Oh and MXGP definitely has better racing right now. It's fun to watch.
Pit Row
Post a reply to: GP vs AMA