Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
But, hey ho , anything that keeps ICE engines around, I'm happy about
The Shop
https://www.bikesportnews.com/news/news-detail/two-strokes-back-in-moto…
Would be great to see what advancements could be made with modern research applied
I don't wanna burst your bubble guys. There is the same issue with hydrogen as with electric power... the storage.
You can't store the hydrogen just willy nilly in the tank or it goes big kaboom (90's cartoon style) when it says howdy to the oxygen in air. You need to fill the volume of the tank with palladium or other chill schmuck that doesn't react with hydrogen.
Is it possible? Yes
Is it reasonable? ehhhm. i don't know.
Well you don't think for minute that these 'new' two strokes are just going to be reproduced 2007 models do you?? Of course they won't, they'll be high-tech, complicated, expensive with mellow power curves- everything a two stroke die hard likes/d about a two stroke, will be gone.
if you factor the ammount of energy (therefore CO2 & NOx emissions - except for sassy norwegians who have huge dams and hydropower up their balls, so their energy is clean - but they are basically cheating ) to transport, produce and assemble wind turbines/solar panels/other greta schmuck - you can call yourself lucky if you produce ammount of energy from it that makes it all dead even at the end of the lifespan of said machine.
surplus green energy *laughs*
Here's a quote this excerpt from a scientific journal
US researchers have carried out an environmental lifecycle assessment of 2-megawatt wind turbines mooted for a large wind farm in the US Pacific Northwest. Writing in the International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing, they conclude that in terms of cumulative energy payback, or the time to produce the amount of energy required of production and installation, a wind turbine with a working life of 20 years will offer a net benefit within five to eight months of being brought online.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/06/14061
5-8 months... Notice it says a '20 year lifespan' - maybe thats not accurate but it could a 1 year lifespan and still be better than continuing to burn coal...
But yeah surplus green energy is a dumb phrase. And completely carbon free energy production is also a farce. But you realise you have to transport all that metal and such to produce and assemble a coal plant right? Also throughout the lifespan of that coal you have to transport coal there. You realise that right... I guess maybe you havent thought this through? Do you work in the dirty energy sector by chance? or do you just like to be wrong for kicks
Pit Row
i do not think i was mistaken, but all the photos were CG or from a video game? (didnt look like the f1 game) Even the extra stories on the bottom with headlines had CG photos. I only came back to see if anyone else noticed it... maybe i glanced over a post? Would be cool none the less, but i think STL has it right. Or true, and F1 photo rights are stupid expensive. but then why not from the actual f1 game?
Post a reply to: F1 looking into 2 stroke engine's for the future