Could today's Nick Wey beat 2000's Jeremy McGrath?

Edited Date/Time 1/27/2012 12:49pm
Yes? No? Maybe?

|
Outsider
Posts
10634
Joined
1/29/2009
Location
Huntington Beach, CA US
12/30/2010 10:41am
Not sure NYK could beat Jeremy today? Shocked
bradmx421
Posts
1616
Joined
1/9/2010
Location
Riverside, CA US
12/30/2010 10:41am
Outsider wrote:
Not sure NYK could beat Jeremy today? Shocked
x2

jeremy has the skills
jeffro503
Posts
27442
Joined
7/22/2007
Location
St Helens, OR US
12/30/2010 10:45am
No way in hell. If Jeremy would of been born 10 years later.....he would be battling Reed , Stewart and everyone else for podiums. I don't care what anyone says. He did what he had to , to win those championships back then.....he would of done the same thing now.

He was born with it.

The Shop

mccread
Posts
5933
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
12/30/2010 10:46am
No... wey is not better than he was 10 years ago...
TriRacer27
Posts
5449
Joined
2/7/2009
Location
Dallas, TX US
Fantasy
47th
12/30/2010 10:56am
If you mean Jeremy from 2000 as in same bike, same speed he rode with in 2000, then yes. Jeremy from 2000 wouldn't crack the top ten with his 2000 season speed. But if you mean Jeremy from 2000 on today's bikes as if he was 10 years younger then no.
bradmx421
Posts
1616
Joined
1/9/2010
Location
Riverside, CA US
12/30/2010 10:57am
mccread wrote:
No... wey is not better than he was 10 years ago...
we will see at A1.....i like the guy and all, but i dont even see him in the top10
kburgie
Posts
223
Joined
5/28/2010
Location
VA US
12/30/2010 10:59am Edited Date/Time 12/30/2010 10:59am
TriRacer27 wrote:
If you mean Jeremy from 2000 as in same bike, same speed he rode with in 2000, then yes. Jeremy from 2000 wouldn't crack the top...
If you mean Jeremy from 2000 as in same bike, same speed he rode with in 2000, then yes. Jeremy from 2000 wouldn't crack the top ten with his 2000 season speed. But if you mean Jeremy from 2000 on today's bikes as if he was 10 years younger then no.
burn1986
Posts
9768
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA US
Fantasy
3303rd
12/30/2010 11:21am
He couldn't beat him with his bike and speed from 2K
12/30/2010 11:32am
I think Nyk is a hell uva rider.

With that said, I think Jeremy Mcgrath would top 5 supercross these days still.

In one of his recent interviews at the honda track he talked about showing up at bercy, or somewhere else...and he said he was there to win, enough said.

they guy still has it and will never loose.

that's not to say Nyk Sucks at all though. Nyk is top10 all season with his consistency....
mxbigd17
Posts
407
Joined
9/1/2010
Location
Johnstown, OH US
12/30/2010 11:47am
McGrath said after a race back in the 90s "i smoked em". He would say the same thing today if he was 24 again. The man had heart no matter what era he would of raced in. He raced on tracks so diff than todays cookie cutter tracks that its really no comparison. The man was and still is brilliant when it comes to racing a motorcycle. Why would you disrespect him by comparing him to Nick Wey's speed. Im pretty sure Wey is fast but Give Me A Break!!!
TeamGreen
Posts
28971
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
12/30/2010 12:08pm Edited Date/Time 12/30/2010 12:09pm
Outsider wrote:
Not sure NYK could beat Jeremy today? Shocked
bradmx421 wrote:
x2

jeremy has the skills
True, and, as J-Mac has proven time after time...



When he's out there havin' a good-time...he Rails and get's up to the front.



He can still hang with the fast guys at the test track.
mxb2
Posts
22488
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD US
12/30/2010 12:11pm
If everyone is healthy, Wey will be lucky to crack the top15!, Please don t put wey and MC in the same category.
DJ KC
Posts
875
Joined
9/14/2007
Location
Germantown, MD US
Fantasy
550th
12/30/2010 12:15pm
mxb2 wrote:
If everyone is healthy, Wey will be lucky to crack the top15!, Please don t put wey and MC in the same category.
X2
Prince1
Posts
218
Joined
9/10/2010
Location
US
12/30/2010 12:18pm
Outsider wrote:
Not sure NYK could beat Jeremy today? Shocked
bradmx421 wrote:
x2

jeremy has the skills
TeamGreen wrote:
True, and, as J-Mac has proven time after time... When he's out there havin' a good-time...he Rails and get's up to the front. He can still...
True, and, as J-Mac has proven time after time...



When he's out there havin' a good-time...he Rails and get's up to the front.



He can still hang with the fast guys at the test track.
All of you are basing this off of MC in 2006 which was what 5 years ago?
T-Fish
Posts
3061
Joined
12/14/2009
Location
Sparta, WI US
Fantasy
173rd
12/30/2010 12:21pm Edited Date/Time 12/30/2010 12:23pm
That's like asking if today's Carmelo Anthony could beat 1998's Michael Jordan.


But really, I think it'd be close if MC was on his two stroke of 2000 and Wey was his pig thumper of today.


TerryB
Posts
2758
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Cambridge, MN US
12/30/2010 12:27pm
No. And I'm not a MC fan.
Torco1
Posts
6591
Joined
4/27/2007
Location
Corona, CA US
12/30/2010 12:29pm
Maybe not, but you have to give the guy some respect for being out there for as long as he has been and making a career for himself for this long.
TeamGreen
Posts
28971
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
12/30/2010 12:31pm
bradmx421 wrote:
x2

jeremy has the skills
TeamGreen wrote:
True, and, as J-Mac has proven time after time... When he's out there havin' a good-time...he Rails and get's up to the front. He can still...
True, and, as J-Mac has proven time after time...



When he's out there havin' a good-time...he Rails and get's up to the front.



He can still hang with the fast guys at the test track.
Prince1 wrote:
All of you are basing this off of MC in 2006 which was what 5 years ago?
Or, actually, Testing in 2010.

I'm jus' sayin'...
mxb2
Posts
22488
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD US
12/30/2010 12:33pm
I think MC could still finish ahead of Wey today!
Sparkalounger
Posts
1320
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Minneapolis, MN US
12/30/2010 12:52pm Edited Date/Time 12/30/2010 1:03pm
TriRacer27 wrote:
If you mean Jeremy from 2000 as in same bike, same speed he rode with in 2000, then yes. Jeremy from 2000 wouldn't crack the top...
If you mean Jeremy from 2000 as in same bike, same speed he rode with in 2000, then yes. Jeremy from 2000 wouldn't crack the top ten with his 2000 season speed. But if you mean Jeremy from 2000 on today's bikes as if he was 10 years younger then no.
well then what track are they riding? a 2000 track or a 2011 track.



speeds were slower in 2000 because the tracks were tougher... not this fourstroke power tracks , jump on jump off 45 mph bullshit



12/30/2010 1:38pm
TriRacer27 wrote:
If you mean Jeremy from 2000 as in same bike, same speed he rode with in 2000, then yes. Jeremy from 2000 wouldn't crack the top...
If you mean Jeremy from 2000 as in same bike, same speed he rode with in 2000, then yes. Jeremy from 2000 wouldn't crack the top ten with his 2000 season speed. But if you mean Jeremy from 2000 on today's bikes as if he was 10 years younger then no.
Yeah, that's what I'm talking asking.

Is Nick Wey (or another rider of his caliber) a faster supercross racer than Jeremy McGrath was in 2000?
12/30/2010 1:53pm
T-Fish wrote:
That's like asking if today's Carmelo Anthony could beat 1998's Michael Jordan. But really, I think it'd be close if MC was on his two stroke...
That's like asking if today's Carmelo Anthony could beat 1998's Michael Jordan.


But really, I think it'd be close if MC was on his two stroke of 2000 and Wey was his pig thumper of today.


Yeah, it is like asking that. Could he? There's a line in this article that touches on that debate:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/ball_dont_lie/post/LeBron-didn-t-mean-contraction-when-talking-ab?urn=nba-300875

"Players are better than they were 25 years ago. Sorry, but they are. For all the talk about how the kids can't shoot and only dunk, understand that shooting percentages from long range are better than they've ever been, and the league almost set a record for free-throw percentage last year as players get better and smarter and faster and work longer hours."

In the 2000 Olympics a guy named Pieter van den Hoogenband set a 200 meter freestyle swimming world record with a 1:45.35.

In the 2008 games Michael Phelps beat it with a 1:42.96. Second and third in that race also beat the former world record. In 2008, with exactly the same ability as he had in 2000, Hoogenband would have been the 4th fastest in the world instead of the 1st.

THAT'S what I'm talking about. Are today's riders fast enough that the guy who finishes 10th at Anaheim 1 in 2011 could have beaten the guy who finished first in 2000.

Post a reply to: Could today's Nick Wey beat 2000's Jeremy McGrath?

The Latest