Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
Thanks for the leads DC! Here is the complete 20 year chart (minus the three that we didn't send a team). I realize there are a lot of other factors (track conditions, did we send our best team some years, etc etc), but I think the trend is undeniable when it comes to US results in relation to the time off before MXdN.
https://racerxonline.com/2018/10/10/observations-motocross-of-nations
Look at this like a company. You give your employees a great work to life ratio where theyre happy, theyll be more productive for you when they are at work. Work your employees 12 hours a day 6-7 days a week, watch them get burnt out and not try as hard and your company will have a high turnover rate.
Supercross needs less rounds. 14 is enough. Put in a nice break between sx and outdoors and run a couple extra nationals to line up with the GPs.
The Shop
America didn’t win much in the mid to late 90s either, what was the excuse then? And BTW USA winning the MXDN doesn’t mean they are superior to European riders or the world championship, so I don’t know what the big deal is or what Americans think USA winning mean...
No one is saying France are the best riders in the world because they have won five in a row..
Let’s be honest USA have HUGE advantage at this race, they have so many riders to choose from compared to other countries, try taking three riders from one state, which, size-wise, is what other countries have to do. And just be glad there is no team Europe to compete with.
Also maybe encourage more rider to want to be world mx champions so you have top US guys racing the world championship then the break won’t exist. And if they win world individual titles, then you can accurately claim America have the best motocross rider in the world.
Year Winner USA Point Margin of Victory / Loss
2005 USA +8 over France
2006 USA +4 over Belgium
2007 USA +26 over France
2008 USA +5 over France
==== 1 Day Format Begins for USA Motocross=
2009 USA +8 over France
2010 USA +7 over Belgium
2011 USA +13 over France
--- 7 Year USA win streak ends ---
2012 Germany -14 (3rd)
2013 Belgium -3 (2nd)
2014 France -16 (3rd)
2015 France -2 (2nd)
2016 France -4 (3rd)
2017 France -65 (9th)
2018 France -14 (6th)
who probably wouldnt be top 5 after an mxgp season today was the fastest european mx2 rider.
You could blame the brake between races all u want but the Cold hard facts is that the brake was just a good thing for them they get to recover after a physically tough season and just fokus all in on mxon. They are still riding every day and training every day. They have time to practice on similar tracks and honing their skills on weak points and 6 weeks to prepare. Think of it this way, every last one of us knows ppl who have been injured half a season and came back being just as good and fast as before.
Fuck windham didnt race for 5 years and beat som very Good riders, roczen was out for 2 years almost and came back and beat 90% of the US field straight away and led laps and this was with years of the bike for these dudes so why should 6 weeks of purely focusing on mxon give you an disadvantage when no one else even har time to thing about mxon until a couple of Days before?.
The gap isn't the entire reason, but I think it's a big part of it. I feel like the numbers indicate a pattern. Nobody can go through two back to back championship series from Jan - August and then keep grinding like they are in the season for another 43 days. Mentally it just doesn't work. Even these super human dudes have to crash and decompress at some point.
With a gap that big, we would be better picking riders who were coming back from early-season injuries and trying to get back to form. You could make a good case for that being part of Ferrandis's motivation as well.
You can't have it both ways........
Can’t have it both ways dude.
Tomac didn't care about Herlings at Ironman because he was racing for the championship
Herlings and Cairoli didn't have to worry about Tomac at WW Ranch because they were racing each other (not Tomac) for the championship.
But who cares, i am the first to admit that i Think tomac would be faster than jh on a bunch of tracks, but its hard to argue against herlings being a more well rounded rider being capable of winning in every type of terrain wich tomac aint unfortunatly.
When it comes to mxon its like this - America should win every year because they are the Only ones who can pick 3 top riders from a pro series to ride for their Country every year and its been like that since the 80s. Sure france do have a couple of guys in the top in both series as well but look at all the other countries who has to pick bottom riders or even amateurs to fill up their teams. Every european knows this and its so much bigger when a small team without 3 top riders wins Against america because every last one of us knows that they are the ones with the huge advantage Against us european and thats why us euros get so hyped up when america gets beat in mxon.
Pit Row
My ideal season would be SX for 10 races.
MXGP 15 races starting a few weeks after SX ends.
6 in Europe. 6 in US. 3 flyaway.
This would put US based riders who ride SX racing from the 1st weekend in January until the end of August and that’s with a weekend off after 5 SX rounds, 3 weekends off before the GP season starts, and 6 weekends off in the midst of the 15 round GP season. Then have MXoN in early September.
Second race
They are faster than us, whats so hard to comprehend?
Its not down time, its the fact that we are slower. Its the fact that the Euro have better outdoor skills than us.
Post a reply to: Cold hard numbers 2005-2018: Win / loss records versus post-season days before MXdN