Posts
6185
Joined
8/27/2006
Location
Acworth, GA
US
Edited Date/Time
8/21/2015 12:31pm
It seems at the pro level the settings and work on the bike mean more than the actual talent. You hear the top pros all the time saying the bike is not where it needs to be which tells me that unless the bike is 100% then you are not going to win no matter how good you are.
What this also tells me is maybe everyone out there should have the chance to ride the same equipment but hey I am not a liberal so I'm not gonna go that far. The top riders got there because of hard work and talent and then they excelled in there career with the help of a team and good bike. However, how many riders have fallen back because of bike settings not being where they need to be.
What this also tells me is maybe everyone out there should have the chance to ride the same equipment but hey I am not a liberal so I'm not gonna go that far. The top riders got there because of hard work and talent and then they excelled in there career with the help of a team and good bike. However, how many riders have fallen back because of bike settings not being where they need to be.
The riders are very mental. They need confidence in the bike. This doesn't at all mean they give a crap about seeing dyno charts and weight loss with titanium.
They need to mentally feel like they have a great bike. They physically must feel comfortable on the bike and have mental confidence to be able to ride the edge.
The Shop
I have however, practiced a corner several times throughout the day and changed my suspension settings, and I could feel a huge difference. So I know there is a lot of advantage to having a bike setup properly. But at some point, where I was setting my suspension up for that corner, I was probably sacrificing somewhere else. Even pros will struggle with the eternally.
As for riders like Roczen, which is probably the unspoken rider we're talking about here, I agree 100% with TXDirt. The little amount that the bike can matter, will make a HUGE difference.
I guess with these guys going 30 minutes and need everything they can to excel the bike setup probably becomes more and more important and they can feel every little thing because they ride so much.
My theory is find something that works well (the best compromise between important sections) and stick with it.
The riders who change their setup all the time are also having to re-learn the bike all the time. A familiar compromise is better on race day than a constant experimental setting. Familiarity is confidence of correction in many cases.
On the other hand, to your point about Roczen... I bought a new bike this month (YZ450F) and wouldn't have been able to race it without some chassis settings. I just didn't have any confidence in the handling until I got the balance corrected. If the gearing or the damping is a little off, no big deal, but chassis balance and lack of stability is a deal breaker. I can only imagine how much more critical that balanced feeling is at Kenny's speed.
I understand your thoughts on bike vs rider at the pro level and the mental side of that, but these guy are pushing the envelope and that 1/10th of a second difference advantage of being right or wrong on setup is the difference to 1st or 2nd place these days.
Fact, no one ever saw how fast Ricky could really go. He had them all covered outdoors, he STILL
had more in the tank even when James was at his peak, now ponder that..
Post a reply to: Bike vs rider