Posts
4082
Joined
6/17/2009
Location
London
US
Edited Date/Time
4/20/2012 7:23am
That video got me thinking... if Bayle retired at 23 (which is nuts!), can you imagine the battles between these two if he had stuck around a few more years? Bayle would have been 25 when MC moved up. I wonder how that might have affected the record books... Where's Sam Beckett when you need him!!? haha.
JMB vs MC - shoulda, woulda, coulda... i'm sure it wouldn't have been as easy, but MC is the king and beat what was infront of him!
The Shop
I love MC but I'm telling you that he became the "king" in an era where many of the top riders were on their way out and the new crop coming up weren't ready for the challenge. I know you can only race the guys that line up but to say that because MC beat who was in front of him he would've done the same to JMB is crazy. MC may have still won but I don't think he would've won as much who knows ...
What kind of crack are you smoking? He won championships over the course of 8 years. How can that be the result of weak fields?
1. I don't smoke crack so there is no kind that I smoke.
2. I'll answer that question with a question to you ... how many riders did McGrath race against during his reign are hall of famers and could legitimately beat him? List them and you'll see what I mean. Look, McGrath is incredible undoubtedly but that time during the sport saw a major lull in talent. Emig was one of the only guys that beat McGrath but can you name anyone else that could really challenge him? Yes, part of the problem was that McGrath had so much talent and was better than everyone else but there was also a talent drain with many of the top guys leaving when McGrath began to dominate.
I do believe MC would still be the King of SX. Had JMB (and RJ before him), his career might have lasted longer. Prior RC, MC's only tough competition was from Emig, Henry, and Lusk.
Pit Row
His Road Racing Stats
His best finish in 250cc season was 8th
His best finish in 500cc season was 9th
His best finish in 500cc was 4th: http://www.motogp.com/en/Results+Statistics/1996/IMO/500cc
MC was on another level both with talent and skills. Add to that...he rode with his brains !
Talent, skill, smart.... That was the winning combo of MC !
Bayle had all those 3 but had the riding style of the 80's in him to much. Even if he would adapted , don't think he would have gotten close to MC. BUT ! ...if both MC and Bayle were in the same age , then we would have seen a battle of finess and mind games !
https://youtu.be/kZuUbwWDeO8
BUT, I've said a hundred times that he was the recipient of possibly the best "timed" career in sports. His competition was missing the very few legends in our sport that just burned inside to get better and win at all costs.
That's just my opinion,. but I've had it since the first year that MC dominated.
Post a reply to: Bayle vs McGrath