Posts
1477
Joined
5/23/2019
Location
AU
Fantasy
309th
Edited Date/Time
10/25/2021 4:01pm
So a few months ago I got really interested in helmet safety and after doing some research I wanted to try and figure out the results of the Fly Formula study. I got around to doing it and it was a lot harder than I thought it would be, this took me a while and I’m not very confident in a few answers, but this is the best that I could come up with. For this I am assuming the helmets are all the Snell versions (if applicable), as they appear to be too heavy to all be ECE and there wouldn’t be much point listing the weights if they are a mix of the Snell and ECE versions. The results are also assuming all the helmets are a size medium, as JT said in a thread a couple of years ago, he was almost positive all the helmets were size mediums.
There’s probably a lot wrong with this list but this is the best I could come up with based on the listed weights of the helmets, a lot of which are very hard to get correct info on. I also spent too much time on this just to delete it lol.
For the helmet weights if the manufacturer listed the weight themselves and I could find it then that is the weight I went with, if not then I looked up the weight from as many sources as I could find and either went with the most reliable one, the most frequent answer or the average answer depending on the sources, frequency of answers and range of answers.
There are probably even some helmets in here that weren’t even used in the test, also it wasn’t possible to come across a reliable answer as to what the weight of the Fox helmet is but I put it in anyway because surely they would’ve tested the Fox helmet. I also struggle to believe that the Bell Moto 9 Flex scored that low, but with all the weights of the helmets that’s really the only spot it fit in. They also may have tested the 6D ATR-1, but I couldn’t find a spot for it, except for where I put the Bell but then there wouldn’t be a spot for the Bell and I figured it was more likely they tested Bell’s and 6D’s premium options rather than just both of 6D’s helmets, JT also said in the same thread mentioned earlier that everyone’s newest helmet was used so that would suggest that only the latest model helmet from each manufacturer was used. Anyway this test was done 2 years ago and it’s not the end all be all of helmet tests but if anyone still cares about this test then if you have suggestions as to what I got wrong then let me know.
There’s probably a lot wrong with this list but this is the best I could come up with based on the listed weights of the helmets, a lot of which are very hard to get correct info on. I also spent too much time on this just to delete it lol.
For the helmet weights if the manufacturer listed the weight themselves and I could find it then that is the weight I went with, if not then I looked up the weight from as many sources as I could find and either went with the most reliable one, the most frequent answer or the average answer depending on the sources, frequency of answers and range of answers.
There are probably even some helmets in here that weren’t even used in the test, also it wasn’t possible to come across a reliable answer as to what the weight of the Fox helmet is but I put it in anyway because surely they would’ve tested the Fox helmet. I also struggle to believe that the Bell Moto 9 Flex scored that low, but with all the weights of the helmets that’s really the only spot it fit in. They also may have tested the 6D ATR-1, but I couldn’t find a spot for it, except for where I put the Bell but then there wouldn’t be a spot for the Bell and I figured it was more likely they tested Bell’s and 6D’s premium options rather than just both of 6D’s helmets, JT also said in the same thread mentioned earlier that everyone’s newest helmet was used so that would suggest that only the latest model helmet from each manufacturer was used. Anyway this test was done 2 years ago and it’s not the end all be all of helmet tests but if anyone still cares about this test then if you have suggestions as to what I got wrong then let me know.
Disclaimer: I think the new Fly helmet is one of the best moto helmets on the market right now but the lack of transparency in the results leaves room for speculation.
That said if someone asked me what I thought the most protective mx helmet is I would probably say the Formula, and I would own one already if it fit my head shape.
The Shop
I've read conflicting things about the 6D helmets and out of all the helmets the 6D is the one I'd like to know the results for the most. This test possibly shows that the 6D scored well but we can't know for sure as the helmets aren't and can only make educated guesses. Same goes for what Ping has been saying about the TLD tests and to me it sounds like he's been alluding to the 6D not scoring well. I read a study comparing to 6D technology to MIPS in bicycle helmets that I can't find at the moment but the study showed that MIPS was better, however 6D also won that grant from the NFL and you'd think the NFL would be the best indicator of quality with all the money they can afford to throw around, but the technology may not translate the same to motocross as it does to football. Who knows. Too much confusion surrounding helmet safety as it seems like there's lots of people doing tests but no one wants to release their results. Except for this one: https://crash.org.au/ratings.php
Which doesn't seem perfect as the testing criteria is designed for road helmets and most of the helmets are outdated but afaik this is the best data available. Plus it's actually independent.
If a company advertises a huge improvement over the competition, start looking for independent research data to verify their claim.
I'm not saying FLY/WPS is lying. In fact, I think their helmets have been consistently great in their price point range for many years. But, they are in the business of selling you product, so a little research can go a long way towards getting a bigger picture of the information being presented, to help you make decisions. (And that last sentence goes for everything in this weird world we live in, not just advertising).
There are some helmets, in that weight class, missing from this list...
Edit, typos.
As for the missing helmets, I would guess they didn't include the Airoh as as far as I'm aware it's not very available in the US. As for the Astars, it might be in there, if it's not then I don't know why it isn't as for the Leatt and any possible others I can't think of right now, I have no idea why they weren't included
Pit Row
https://helmet.beam.vt.edu/bicycle-helmet-ratings.html
The new ECE 22.06 certification makes all this outdated. The certifications have the medical direction.
Post a reply to: Attempting to identify the helmets used in the Fly Formula test