Posts
116
Joined
8/13/2019
Location
Tampa, FL
US
So full disclosure I have a big head and wear an XL but I just got my new 6D ATR2 today and good lord this thing is huge. I’m coming from a Fox V1 and the Fox is def smaller.
I was torn between the 6D and a Moto 9 flex and if the flex is noticeably smaller than I may switch and try it.
What do you guys think?
I was torn between the 6D and a Moto 9 flex and if the flex is noticeably smaller than I may switch and try it.
What do you guys think?
The Shop
I gotta add a quick note, I had a pretty good crash at AX this past weekend. I cross rutted on a double, bounced off the landing and slammed myself head first into the face of the next jump. I don’t know if the results would’ve been different in a different helmet, but I was impressed that I didn’t get knocked out in the crash.
Buy what you want.
I’ve been in the Bell for last 10+ years.
I just ordered a 6D/ FXR helmet to try out. It should be here next week...
But the Flex design is a considerable upgrade from the standard MIPS model. They both feel the same to me, I own a dozen of them, mostly the Flex model.
I had a feeling the 6D might be a little big with their technology taking up room between the outter shell and liner. But if it fits good on my head, it’ll be my new off-road helmet !
Post a reply to: Are Bells noticeably smaller than 6D’s?