Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
Most of the winning in the MXGP class is done by a few guys? That's normal. Same in the Nationals:
2017
Overall winners: GP's 5 - 3 AMA *5
Moto winners: GP's 7 - 6 AMA
Top three in a moto: GP's 15 - 11 AMA
2016
Overall winners: GP's 5 - 2 AMA
Moto winners: GP's 6 - 2 AMA
Top three in a moto: GP's 15 - 10 AMA
2015
Overall winners: GP's 7 - 4 AMA
Moto winners: GP's 8 - 4 AMA
Top three in a moto: 14 - 11 AMA
2014
Overall winners: GP's 5 - 5 AMA
Moto winners: GP's 6 - 6 AMA
Top three in a moto: GP's 8 - 6 AMA
But MXGP has more winners and threats for the podium year on year and I think that's maybe where 'the depth' point comes into play for many, rightly or wrongly, it is what it is, and it'll never truly be settled I doubt!
Until then it's Tomac 5-1 in USGP's, Team USA on a five year losing streak, Herlings undefeated in the AMA Nationals, Tomac 6th on average in Europe, Eli has the head-to-head advantage over Cairoli, Herlings has the advantage over Eli, RJ ruined Seewer and Jonass, Pourcel smoked RV/RD far more times than he did Cairoli, coupled with caveat after caveat to counter and justify why, all in the name of bench racing! The hype wouldn't be there without it andthe sky isn't falling out of AMA Motocross, just the high expectations previously set aren't arguably always being met!
The Shop
Along with Herlings charge at Ironman, arguably the best moto we've seen outdoors all year.
You said Prado and Lawerence and they are great and Padro has been linked to coming to the AMA for years and Wheeler just said Lawerence is coming over to Geico in 2019 so it looks like Supercross is still doing its job of attracting top talent.
Tomac struggled on Saturday and then went 1-3 on Sunday so who cares if he got 13th, when it mattered a far better Tomac showed up.
You can compare the two series easily but Injuries every year play the biggest factor in both series. Usually the AMA guys get hurt more and it showed this year. By the end of the nationals a lot of the talent was hurt but it's not like they don't exist. The 2015 MXGP season was the pretty bad for injuries for example.
Tomac was helped out for the title with injuries or from retirement but every rider who has won a championship in either the AMA or GPs currently racing has been helped out by someone getting Hurt,Moving form GPs to AMA or from retiring so why should Tomac be singled out?
Also I can only think of a single race where Pourcel beat RV and he crashed in the race but he did beat Dungey in a one year strecth more than he beat AC although they tied on overall wins that year and RD got the title. So he beat AC for a title but never RV or RD and he got some help to beat AC though as AC won three times as many motos that year but had a strange year with dumb mistakes.
Here are some statistics for you. There have been 4 GPs in the US in the last 3 years. 2 of the tracks nobody ever raced before. Between the 250 and 450s the US has won 5 of 8 possible overalls / 10 of 16 possible motos / 15 of 24 possible podiums.
Its even more impressive when you consider Tomac is the only top 10 450 guy we had last two years and in 2015 we had Cooper racing a 450 for the first time and Josh Grant. In the 250s we typically have one or two top five guys and that's it. Exept for this year of course when our 10th ranked 250 guy went 1-1.
Herlings put a smack down on everyone the last two weeks and it was awesome to watch. Herlings speed doesn't make the rest of the GP guys faster though. And it doesn't change the fact that the few US guys we entered in GPs over the last few years earned more overall wins, more moto wins, and more podiums than the entire make up of the best GP riders from around the globe.
That's Right. Nothing Is Over.
Sure MX1 may well be deeper but that's probably the age rule packing it out earlier in riders careers,Herlings,Gajser,Febvre,Coldenhof, Anstie all up fairly recently,that's why at a time at the weekend the race behind the JH and AC duel saw 2nd to 12th place all in the 2.08-2.09 second laptimes,it's a tight field
The AMA has lost Dungey,Stewart,RV and Reed/Canard to a different extent in short sucession
I won't even mention the constant need for comparison reeks of insecurity (from both sides)... oh wait I just did didn't I?
There is no 250 guy who is a 'must hire' , just loads of 'on his day with a start ' guys.
AMA has lost its lustre, for the reasons you said, and I don't see the next group of riders to replace them , as obvious choices... Webb was the 'next big thing' and he hasn't delivered , for various reasons.
Would you have ever seen Bogle win 2 moto's and an overall in any other year .. not a chance.
You can only race the guys out there, I guess the fact that so many of the top guys went give others a chance to shine,
In their prime btw
Pit Row
Maybe there isn't a 'must hire' 250 guy in America but I would still sign most of their top ten over the MX2 class riders. Seewer and Jonass are good, but they're not 'hot shots' destined for greatness. Prado, Olson and Mewse have shown potential, Covington is improving but erratic and Paturel - who a lot of people expected to be fighting for the title this season - has not kicked on as expected, so we're not exactly spoilt for talent ourselves at the moment. I don't know much about the next batch of EMX riders though.
As has been said before, start comparing by States, and you have a better idea of the reality . I can drive across Holland in 45mins, its not big even for a State.
USA will be still be the only team with 3 factory guys on it even though a bunch of them were too busy / injured to come.
Really if you think about it, the stand out guys from Europe are either dominating the class right now (Cairoli, Herlings) or moved to AMA (Musquin, Roczen, Pourcel).
There is an argument for SERIES vs. SERIES, but theres plenty of numbskulls here who still insist American RIDERS are stronger than Euro, which simply isn't the case.
If you're going RIDERS vs RIDERS, then you cannot claim Roczen, Marvin or Dean. So, try to picture this past outdoors series without MM or DW. How strong does it look then?
Or, lets fast forward to SX 2018, it looks as if ET3 is favourite. Let's just say Roczen & Marvin decide to upsticks and move back to Europe... Who brings the challenge to ET then? Doesn't look so strong does it..?
Furthermore- At Ironman, JH was comfortably able to come from last to first in that second moto. Whilst ET3 wasn't able to progress further than 12th last saturday. As well as in the first moto on Sunday, JH & AC were able to progress from 12-15th on the first lap to 2 & 3rd.
JT said himself- "I question whether ET would have been able to climb through to 2nd if he'd gotten the start that JH had..
ET3 is strong. He's up there with the best. The others, not so much.
Truth is ET is way faster then most US riders, Bagget & Anderson can be fast but not consistently. After that the rest would be outside top 15 MXGP.
ET who is a potential world champion spending his career racing against a couple top riders then a bunch of national class guys is a waste.
I would love to see what Bagget could do if he gave SX the finger, spent the winter smashing the deep sand tracks of Europe, then went for a world title. I think there is another level inside Bagget outdoors if he had a chance to prepare right.
Why would you bring up SX? 8 of the 10 best in the world are American. If they went home, there talent would be wasted and out of a field of 22, 2 guys would be gone. The only undebatable thing on this forum is that America is better than the rest of the world combined at SX. Don't know why you brought that into it.
Post a reply to: AMA Nationals sub par? Lets take a look.