Posts
517
Joined
6/15/2015
Location
Whittier, CA
US
I want to explain to my friend the characteristics of a 2 stroke being more of a rear steering bike, whereas a 4 stroke has more weight over the front end.
This is due to power delivery not chassis geometry right?
This is due to power delivery not chassis geometry right?
The "weight over the front end" thing is geometry. Both bikes would have similar fore/aft weight balance due to the frame angles.
"Rear wheel steering" vs. "Front wheel steering" is really a misnomer. It comes more from the ability to powerslide or steer while the wheel is spinning. Two strokes tend to be more "rear wheel" -ish, because not only do they break free more easily, but they also aren't as likely to gyro-stabilize when the engine is turning over. Thus, you can turn a 2-stroke with the power on and the rear wheel spinning (rear-wheel steer,) while on a 4-stroke you would tend to corner first, and then lay on the power as you are exiting the turn (front-wheel steering.) This is why my buddy is so amazed I can get on the throttle so early in the turns. It's not really me being that good; it's just that the smoker makes it easy.
Handling is by far the #1 reason why I hate four strokes. When cornering a 4-stroke, if you grab a handful of throttle like I do on my 250, you are likely to stand straight up and go straight off the track.
I think answers will vary person to person, with some consistancy between them all. The answer is go ride them both and see for yourself.
The Shop
The Ractech Suspension Bible claims:
“A change in flywheel weight can feel like a change of compression damping”.
So totally changing the engine weight, rotating mass, and power delivery could have a huge impact on “handling”.
Ktm four and two stroke chassis look the same but are they? I know the fork valving is a lot different.
Power delivery characteristics are the key factor here. You can verify this by the near 100% rate of people saying adding a flywheel weight literally made their bike feel brand new. I am part of that group.
Once a 2T starts spinning the rear tire, it is more apt to keep spinning due to the engine generating a power pulse on every revolution. The 4T has a power pulse every other revolution and is more apt to maintain or regain traction. This is why the rear of a 4T is less busy and the bike is aimed more with the front tire.
Pit Row
To me, the 2 strokes are harder to setup the suspension on (rear mainly) do to the type of power and the amount of power cycles per given second.
Post a reply to: 2 stk & 4 stk handling