Triumph,Wtf are you doing?..

JohnnyD13
Posts
750
Joined
3/23/2014
Location
Loganville, GA US
8/25/2023 11:13am
JohnnyD13 wrote:
How bout this. Calm down. It’s going to be ok. And if a company try’s something different, it’s also going to be ok. There’s some more...

How bout this. Calm down. It’s going to be ok. And if a company try’s something different, it’s also going to be ok. There’s some more important issues to get up in arms about

stremme12 wrote:

Got it.

 

Everyone lets get back to the Stark Varg thread. 

I ordered one of those. All my kids have electric bikes. Really nice when they are young

JohnnyD13
Posts
750
Joined
3/23/2014
Location
Loganville, GA US
8/25/2023 11:18am
JohnnyD13 wrote:
How bout this. Calm down. It’s going to be ok. And if a company try’s something different, it’s also going to be ok. There’s some more...

How bout this. Calm down. It’s going to be ok. And if a company try’s something different, it’s also going to be ok. There’s some more important issues to get up in arms about

stremme12 wrote:

Got it.

 

Everyone lets get back to the Stark Varg thread. 

JohnnyD13 wrote:

I ordered one of those. All my kids have electric bikes. Really nice when they are young

IMG 6175.png?VersionId=VrT3t.nQ4Xof064

9
#434
Posts
1913
Joined
3/23/2017
Location
DE
8/25/2023 12:04pm

I've got to hand it to you, you're very consistent with your bad takes on whatever you're commenting on.

#434 wrote:

Are my takes bad because they are wrong or just because you don’t like them?

If they’re wrong, I‘d love to discuss!

constantly shouting the praises of a previously-unknown start-up while accusing one of the worlds' biggest and respected manufacturers of putting a badge on a Asian companies'...

constantly shouting the praises of a previously-unknown start-up while accusing one of the worlds' biggest and respected manufacturers of putting a badge on a Asian companies' bike seems like a pretty bad take tbh..

What was wrong what I said about the Stark Varg?

And what was wrong about my statement that Triumph will run a KTM replica engine manufactured in Asia?

See, you think my takes are bad because you don’t like them, not because they’re wrong.

23
8/29/2023 8:44am
#434 wrote:

Are my takes bad because they are wrong or just because you don’t like them?

If they’re wrong, I‘d love to discuss!

constantly shouting the praises of a previously-unknown start-up while accusing one of the worlds' biggest and respected manufacturers of putting a badge on a Asian companies'...

constantly shouting the praises of a previously-unknown start-up while accusing one of the worlds' biggest and respected manufacturers of putting a badge on a Asian companies' bike seems like a pretty bad take tbh..

#434 wrote:
What was wrong what I said about the Stark Varg? And what was wrong about my statement that Triumph will run a KTM replica engine manufactured...

What was wrong what I said about the Stark Varg?

And what was wrong about my statement that Triumph will run a KTM replica engine manufactured in Asia?

See, you think my takes are bad because you don’t like them, not because they’re wrong.

Original quote: "is it possible that Triumph just lends its name to the project and that the bike is made in Asia?"

That's a bit different to you now saying Triumph will run an engine built in Asia. Huge difference between getting some manufacturing done elsewhere (as most manufacturers do these days anyway) and just putting your name to a whole bike otherwise built elsewhere and handing the whole lot over to a third party as you were implying. Nice try at swerving..

As for the Stark; your constant arse-kissing for a new unproven company with no facts or figures to back yourself up is only matched by your insistence that something built by a reputable one will be a cheap knock-off - with no facts or figures to back yourself up..

6
1

The Shop

Alex814
Posts
1201
Joined
12/18/2014
Location
IL US
8/29/2023 9:03am

Is Triumph planning to use the one year works-bike exemption to race in 2024? Or do they plan to have the bikes in dealerships this winter?

4
stremme12
Posts
1220
Joined
3/10/2015
Location
HA, HI US
8/29/2023 9:12am
Alex814 wrote:

Is Triumph planning to use the one year works-bike exemption to race in 2024? Or do they plan to have the bikes in dealerships this winter?

That rule doesn't exist anymore.

3
Alex814
Posts
1201
Joined
12/18/2014
Location
IL US
8/29/2023 9:19am
Alex814 wrote:

Is Triumph planning to use the one year works-bike exemption to race in 2024? Or do they plan to have the bikes in dealerships this winter?

stremme12 wrote:

That rule doesn't exist anymore.

Ah. They must be closer to turning on the production line than it would appear in these media releases. 

stremme12
Posts
1220
Joined
3/10/2015
Location
HA, HI US
8/29/2023 9:21am
Alex814 wrote:

Is Triumph planning to use the one year works-bike exemption to race in 2024? Or do they plan to have the bikes in dealerships this winter?

stremme12 wrote:

That rule doesn't exist anymore.

Alex814 wrote:

Ah. They must be closer to turning on the production line than it would appear in these media releases. 

You would think so. What is it 200 units need to be available this winter/spring?

aees
Posts
2724
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
8/29/2023 10:16am
HarrowDrag wrote:
Ofcourse we are interested...There's a new dirtbike being released. A 'view' is a click in a world of people glued to their phone and stuck at...

Ofcourse we are interested...There's a new dirtbike being released.

A 'view' is a click in a world of people glued to their phone and stuck at their desk.

Thoughts and opinions on the other hand are shared here and it sure sounds like people are over it.

ML512 wrote:
It's always easier to leave a negative comment over a positive one. I'm not saying they've done a great job with their rollout but it's not...

It's always easier to leave a negative comment over a positive one.

I'm not saying they've done a great job with their rollout but it's not going to be some downfall of the brand. They've built a lot of excitement and hype for the brand, the upcoming rollouts of racing info, the facility they've built, partners in the team, etc will get people pretty hyped. Seeing how much money they're investing into the sport, creating jobs and rides, etc. 

The bike will be released, it'll sell well, and most will forget the drawn-out launch decisions.

It's poor choice of marketing strategy. People don't have the patience today. I was looking fwd to the first one, but lost interest completely when how they would release it was exposed. 

Like TV series today who wants an episode a week? You wait untils it all there. Anything else is just annoying.

4
6
burn1986
Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA US
8/29/2023 11:38am Edited Date/Time 8/29/2023 11:39am

Dylan Ferrandis as a possible rider in the future? Although, it sounds like they’re a little heavy on staff atm.

8/29/2023 11:47am
aees wrote:
It's poor choice of marketing strategy. People don't have the patience today. I was looking fwd to the first one, but lost interest completely when how...

It's poor choice of marketing strategy. People don't have the patience today. I was looking fwd to the first one, but lost interest completely when how they would release it was exposed. 

Like TV series today who wants an episode a week? You wait untils it all there. Anything else is just annoying.

A lot of shows on streaming services went back to limited episodes per week or just one per week. 

#434
Posts
1913
Joined
3/23/2017
Location
DE
8/29/2023 11:53am
constantly shouting the praises of a previously-unknown start-up while accusing one of the worlds' biggest and respected manufacturers of putting a badge on a Asian companies'...

constantly shouting the praises of a previously-unknown start-up while accusing one of the worlds' biggest and respected manufacturers of putting a badge on a Asian companies' bike seems like a pretty bad take tbh..

#434 wrote:
What was wrong what I said about the Stark Varg? And what was wrong about my statement that Triumph will run a KTM replica engine manufactured...

What was wrong what I said about the Stark Varg?

And what was wrong about my statement that Triumph will run a KTM replica engine manufactured in Asia?

See, you think my takes are bad because you don’t like them, not because they’re wrong.

Original quote: "is it possible that Triumph just lends its name to the project and that the bike is made in Asia?" That's a bit different...

Original quote: "is it possible that Triumph just lends its name to the project and that the bike is made in Asia?"

That's a bit different to you now saying Triumph will run an engine built in Asia. Huge difference between getting some manufacturing done elsewhere (as most manufacturers do these days anyway) and just putting your name to a whole bike otherwise built elsewhere and handing the whole lot over to a third party as you were implying. Nice try at swerving..

As for the Stark; your constant arse-kissing for a new unproven company with no facts or figures to back yourself up is only matched by your insistence that something built by a reputable one will be a cheap knock-off - with no facts or figures to back yourself up..

Yeah, that’s why I formulated it as a question.. we‘ll see in a few months if the bike says made in GB or not.

And for the Stark stuff: tell me where I was wrong! Most of technical aspects I defended where easy to spot with the slightest technical knowledge. And that the company was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired. That’s when I placed my order.

I don’t care about a brand or if it’s an eMX or not. I just wanna see great engineering! I’m impressed by Stark, but not YET by Triumph. 

3
9
8/29/2023 11:55am
mark_swart wrote:
PR guy chiming in here.... I like the idea of the extended, group by group rollout of the different components (frame, engine, suspension, chassis/bodywork). It makes...

PR guy chiming in here.... I like the idea of the extended, group by group rollout of the different components (frame, engine, suspension, chassis/bodywork). It makes people pay attention to the details of your product and what makes it unique - and is also great way to shut down that common misperception that it's Austrian. BUT if you are going to roll it out over time, the content needs to be backwards planned from the unveil date and done at a regular cadence. Weekly, bi-weekly, whatever. You want the whole thing to build to the big unveil date. It's the unpredictable timing of this rollout that is frustrating, in my opinion. And when the timing is unpredictable, it gives the impression that the campaign is being made up as it goes along.

Exactly! You'll only get a few minutes of people's attention regardless, so spreading it out over time gives you cumulatively much more time to tell the story. but people also have a short memory so it only works if you have truly innovative features to announce. The downside (besides frustration with the inconsistent release frequency) is that unique features of your product have less of an impact as a whole. It's the opposite of the Apple method where they they try to announce so many features for a product at once that the whole seems more than the sum of its parts. Consumers are left with the impression that it can do everything other products can't do because they can't even remember all the new features. 

When this bike is finally revealed, people will have forgotten about the engineering that went into the frame and engine, so they better have something memorable for the bike's release. A cool facility and partners aren't going to cut it. 

1
-MAVERICK-
Posts
65691
Joined
3/26/2015
Location
Ontario CA
8/29/2023 11:59am
burn1986 wrote:

Dylan Ferrandis as a possible rider in the future? Although, it sounds like they’re a little heavy on staff atm.

According to Matthes, he apparently had that option for next year. Posted it in the silly season thread. 

2024: 250 MX Only 

2025: 450 SX & MX

Looks like Savatgy might be the one that took that deal. 

6
Question
Posts
3178
Joined
6/26/2014
Location
FR
8/29/2023 1:47pm Edited Date/Time 8/29/2023 1:48pm
burn1986 wrote:

Dylan Ferrandis as a possible rider in the future? Although, it sounds like they’re a little heavy on staff atm.

-MAVERICK- wrote:
According to Matthes, he apparently had that option for next year. Posted it in the silly season thread.  2024: 250 MX Only  2025: 450 SX &...

According to Matthes, he apparently had that option for next year. Posted it in the silly season thread. 

2024: 250 MX Only 

2025: 450 SX & MX

Looks like Savatgy might be the one that took that deal. 

Ouch. That was a pretty good deal ... (+ gear + monster)

-MAVERICK-
Posts
65691
Joined
3/26/2015
Location
Ontario CA
8/29/2023 3:15pm
burn1986 wrote:

Dylan Ferrandis as a possible rider in the future? Although, it sounds like they’re a little heavy on staff atm.

-MAVERICK- wrote:
According to Matthes, he apparently had that option for next year. Posted it in the silly season thread.  2024: 250 MX Only  2025: 450 SX &...

According to Matthes, he apparently had that option for next year. Posted it in the silly season thread. 

2024: 250 MX Only 

2025: 450 SX & MX

Looks like Savatgy might be the one that took that deal. 

Question wrote:

Ouch. That was a pretty good deal ... (+ gear + monster)

IMO, it would be a step backwards. 

Like most 250 teams they have a gear deal in place. Monster? Maybe the team will have a conflicting sponsor. 

It's a new bike, and it's still going to need a lot of development, and they'll have issues to sort out. 

2025. Again, the 450 will be a brand new bike with issues to sort out.

He's still a championship contender/podium guy. Because of that I think he can't afford to take a chance on Triumph. 

10
Falcon
Posts
12253
Joined
11/16/2011
Location
Menifee, CA US
8/29/2023 3:25pm

I wish they had waited until they are closer to being ready before announcing the frame and engine. It's cool to do teasers like that, but they should probably have been ready to go with the whole bike first, and then done the component releases a week or two apart. 

2
3
8/30/2023 2:06am
#434 wrote:
What was wrong what I said about the Stark Varg? And what was wrong about my statement that Triumph will run a KTM replica engine manufactured...

What was wrong what I said about the Stark Varg?

And what was wrong about my statement that Triumph will run a KTM replica engine manufactured in Asia?

See, you think my takes are bad because you don’t like them, not because they’re wrong.

Original quote: "is it possible that Triumph just lends its name to the project and that the bike is made in Asia?" That's a bit different...

Original quote: "is it possible that Triumph just lends its name to the project and that the bike is made in Asia?"

That's a bit different to you now saying Triumph will run an engine built in Asia. Huge difference between getting some manufacturing done elsewhere (as most manufacturers do these days anyway) and just putting your name to a whole bike otherwise built elsewhere and handing the whole lot over to a third party as you were implying. Nice try at swerving..

As for the Stark; your constant arse-kissing for a new unproven company with no facts or figures to back yourself up is only matched by your insistence that something built by a reputable one will be a cheap knock-off - with no facts or figures to back yourself up..

#434 wrote:
Yeah, that’s why I formulated it as a question.. we‘ll see in a few months if the bike says made in GB or not. And for...

Yeah, that’s why I formulated it as a question.. we‘ll see in a few months if the bike says made in GB or not.

And for the Stark stuff: tell me where I was wrong! Most of technical aspects I defended where easy to spot with the slightest technical knowledge. And that the company was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired. That’s when I placed my order.

I don’t care about a brand or if it’s an eMX or not. I just wanna see great engineering! I’m impressed by Stark, but not YET by Triumph. 

Quote: "And that the company (Stark) was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired"

But a reputable, established company like Triumph presenting the top-notch team they've hired doesn't make it legit.?

Quote: "Most of technical aspects I defended where easy to spot with the slightest technical knowledge" But you're knocking Triumph and making assumptions without seeing their technical aspects?

As I said; you're defending one company using the same scenarios you're knocking another one with.. smh

6
aees
Posts
2724
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
8/30/2023 4:50am
aees wrote:
It's poor choice of marketing strategy. People don't have the patience today. I was looking fwd to the first one, but lost interest completely when how...

It's poor choice of marketing strategy. People don't have the patience today. I was looking fwd to the first one, but lost interest completely when how they would release it was exposed. 

Like TV series today who wants an episode a week? You wait untils it all there. Anything else is just annoying.

A lot of shows on streaming services went back to limited episodes per week or just one per week. 

And everybody hates it. Its like going back to watching TV from a TV-guide, like its 1990 again.

3
#434
Posts
1913
Joined
3/23/2017
Location
DE
8/30/2023 4:58am Edited Date/Time 8/30/2023 5:10am
Original quote: "is it possible that Triumph just lends its name to the project and that the bike is made in Asia?" That's a bit different...

Original quote: "is it possible that Triumph just lends its name to the project and that the bike is made in Asia?"

That's a bit different to you now saying Triumph will run an engine built in Asia. Huge difference between getting some manufacturing done elsewhere (as most manufacturers do these days anyway) and just putting your name to a whole bike otherwise built elsewhere and handing the whole lot over to a third party as you were implying. Nice try at swerving..

As for the Stark; your constant arse-kissing for a new unproven company with no facts or figures to back yourself up is only matched by your insistence that something built by a reputable one will be a cheap knock-off - with no facts or figures to back yourself up..

#434 wrote:
Yeah, that’s why I formulated it as a question.. we‘ll see in a few months if the bike says made in GB or not. And for...

Yeah, that’s why I formulated it as a question.. we‘ll see in a few months if the bike says made in GB or not.

And for the Stark stuff: tell me where I was wrong! Most of technical aspects I defended where easy to spot with the slightest technical knowledge. And that the company was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired. That’s when I placed my order.

I don’t care about a brand or if it’s an eMX or not. I just wanna see great engineering! I’m impressed by Stark, but not YET by Triumph. 

Quote: "And that the company (Stark) was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired" But a reputable...

Quote: "And that the company (Stark) was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired"

But a reputable, established company like Triumph presenting the top-notch team they've hired doesn't make it legit.?

Quote: "Most of technical aspects I defended where easy to spot with the slightest technical knowledge" But you're knocking Triumph and making assumptions without seeing their technical aspects?

As I said; you're defending one company using the same scenarios you're knocking another one with.. smh

You’re mixing things up. The legitimacy and the engineering prowess of a company often times have not a lot to do with each other.

And I‘ve never doubted that Triumph is legit. It’s more a matter of how much of their money and brain power are they willing to put into the project. According to the engine not much…

edited: typo

1
14
BigIron
Posts
46
Joined
3/18/2019
Location
Berea, KY US
8/30/2023 6:07am
#434 wrote:
Yeah, that’s why I formulated it as a question.. we‘ll see in a few months if the bike says made in GB or not. And for...

Yeah, that’s why I formulated it as a question.. we‘ll see in a few months if the bike says made in GB or not.

And for the Stark stuff: tell me where I was wrong! Most of technical aspects I defended where easy to spot with the slightest technical knowledge. And that the company was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired. That’s when I placed my order.

I don’t care about a brand or if it’s an eMX or not. I just wanna see great engineering! I’m impressed by Stark, but not YET by Triumph. 

Quote: "And that the company (Stark) was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired" But a reputable...

Quote: "And that the company (Stark) was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired"

But a reputable, established company like Triumph presenting the top-notch team they've hired doesn't make it legit.?

Quote: "Most of technical aspects I defended where easy to spot with the slightest technical knowledge" But you're knocking Triumph and making assumptions without seeing their technical aspects?

As I said; you're defending one company using the same scenarios you're knocking another one with.. smh

#434 wrote:
You’re mixing things up. The legitimacy and the engineering prowess of a company often times have not a lot to do with each other. And I‘ve...

You’re mixing things up. The legitimacy and the engineering prowess of a company often times have not a lot to do with each other.

And I‘ve never doubted that Triumph is legit. It’s more a matter of how much of their money and brain power are they willing to put into the project. According to the engine not much…

edited: typo

What did you expect from the engine?  Flux Capacitor?  Overdrive Thruster? Turbonic Venturi Power Assimilator?  Maybe a flame thrower?  

5
8/30/2023 6:21am
aees wrote:

And everybody hates it. Its like going back to watching TV from a TV-guide, like its 1990 again.

Not really. Binging a show is cool but it’s nice to have a show to look forward to on a Thursday again or something. And it keeps people on the streaming service. 

2
8/30/2023 7:37am Edited Date/Time 8/30/2023 7:40am
#434 wrote:
Yeah, that’s why I formulated it as a question.. we‘ll see in a few months if the bike says made in GB or not. And for...

Yeah, that’s why I formulated it as a question.. we‘ll see in a few months if the bike says made in GB or not.

And for the Stark stuff: tell me where I was wrong! Most of technical aspects I defended where easy to spot with the slightest technical knowledge. And that the company was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired. That’s when I placed my order.

I don’t care about a brand or if it’s an eMX or not. I just wanna see great engineering! I’m impressed by Stark, but not YET by Triumph. 

Quote: "And that the company (Stark) was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired" But a reputable...

Quote: "And that the company (Stark) was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired"

But a reputable, established company like Triumph presenting the top-notch team they've hired doesn't make it legit.?

Quote: "Most of technical aspects I defended where easy to spot with the slightest technical knowledge" But you're knocking Triumph and making assumptions without seeing their technical aspects?

As I said; you're defending one company using the same scenarios you're knocking another one with.. smh

#434 wrote:
You’re mixing things up. The legitimacy and the engineering prowess of a company often times have not a lot to do with each other. And I‘ve...

You’re mixing things up. The legitimacy and the engineering prowess of a company often times have not a lot to do with each other.

And I‘ve never doubted that Triumph is legit. It’s more a matter of how much of their money and brain power are they willing to put into the project. According to the engine not much…

edited: typo

If you think Triumph haven't come into this with their eyes open and a determination to succeed, then you haven't been paying attention for the past 30 years. Ask BMW and Cannondale if they wish they'd taken their time and built it up from a solid foundation first instead of trying to reinvent the wheel.

Quote: "according to the engine not much.." You've seen it running then, and had some performance figures shown to you? Or are you an expert on that too just from a few photos, just like you're so certain about the Stark from a promo video and a load of stats from their PR company?

3
mx4
Posts
356
Joined
12/14/2018
Location
Tallahassee, FL US
8/30/2023 8:07am

I hope the bike is good , but I don’t think many people have interest in the bike anyway

9
#434
Posts
1913
Joined
3/23/2017
Location
DE
8/30/2023 8:27am
Quote: "And that the company (Stark) was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired" But a reputable...

Quote: "And that the company (Stark) was legit, was clear the day they did their media launch and presented the guys they‘ve hired"

But a reputable, established company like Triumph presenting the top-notch team they've hired doesn't make it legit.?

Quote: "Most of technical aspects I defended where easy to spot with the slightest technical knowledge" But you're knocking Triumph and making assumptions without seeing their technical aspects?

As I said; you're defending one company using the same scenarios you're knocking another one with.. smh

#434 wrote:
You’re mixing things up. The legitimacy and the engineering prowess of a company often times have not a lot to do with each other. And I‘ve...

You’re mixing things up. The legitimacy and the engineering prowess of a company often times have not a lot to do with each other.

And I‘ve never doubted that Triumph is legit. It’s more a matter of how much of their money and brain power are they willing to put into the project. According to the engine not much…

edited: typo

If you think Triumph haven't come into this with their eyes open and a determination to succeed, then you haven't been paying attention for the past...

If you think Triumph haven't come into this with their eyes open and a determination to succeed, then you haven't been paying attention for the past 30 years. Ask BMW and Cannondale if they wish they'd taken their time and built it up from a solid foundation first instead of trying to reinvent the wheel.

Quote: "according to the engine not much.." You've seen it running then, and had some performance figures shown to you? Or are you an expert on that too just from a few photos, just like you're so certain about the Stark from a promo video and a load of stats from their PR company?

Bro, they buy an engine from another manufacturer! What does that say about their engine-ering?

1
16
colintrax
Posts
4695
Joined
8/25/2015
Location
Taylorsville, GA US
8/30/2023 9:28am
#434 wrote:

Bro, they buy an engine from another manufacturer! What does that say about their engine-ering?

We don't know Triumph is using a 22 KTM engine. They're certainly buying some parts from whoever made them for KTM (like the clutch cover as I pointed out) but that means absolutely nothing as far as the crankshaft, pistons, cams, gear ratios, combustion chamber, head ports, Ignition, etc

2
BigIron
Posts
46
Joined
3/18/2019
Location
Berea, KY US
8/30/2023 11:58am
#434 wrote:

Bro, they buy an engine from another manufacturer! What does that say about their engine-ering?

colintrax wrote:
We don't know Triumph is using a 22 KTM engine. They're certainly buying some parts from whoever made them for KTM (like the clutch cover as...

We don't know Triumph is using a 22 KTM engine. They're certainly buying some parts from whoever made them for KTM (like the clutch cover as I pointed out) but that means absolutely nothing as far as the crankshaft, pistons, cams, gear ratios, combustion chamber, head ports, Ignition, etc

I don't see how anyone can look at these two covers and think they are the same part.  It isn't odd the engine has a head, cylinder, crankcase, clutch cover, etc.  That doesn't mean KTM or one of it's affiliates manufactured it.

image-20230830140444-1

13
2
8/30/2023 1:16pm
BigIron wrote:
I don't see how anyone can look at these two covers and think they are the same part.  It isn't odd the engine has a head...

I don't see how anyone can look at these two covers and think they are the same part.  It isn't odd the engine has a head, cylinder, crankcase, clutch cover, etc.  That doesn't mean KTM or one of it's affiliates manufactured it.

image-20230830140444-1

The general visual comparison is not to that KTM, but the previous generation:

2021-KTM-250-SX-F-4 0

2
1
BigIron
Posts
46
Joined
3/18/2019
Location
Berea, KY US
8/30/2023 1:40pm
BigIron wrote:
I don't see how anyone can look at these two covers and think they are the same part.  It isn't odd the engine has a head...

I don't see how anyone can look at these two covers and think they are the same part.  It isn't odd the engine has a head, cylinder, crankcase, clutch cover, etc.  That doesn't mean KTM or one of it's affiliates manufactured it.

image-20230830140444-1

The general visual comparison is not to that KTM, but the previous generation:

The general visual comparison is not to that KTM, but the previous generation:

2021-KTM-250-SX-F-4 0

Design queues, maybe.  Still not the same.

image-20230830164048-1

3
1
8/30/2023 1:49pm Edited Date/Time 8/30/2023 2:16pm
BigIron wrote:
I don't see how anyone can look at these two covers and think they are the same part.  It isn't odd the engine has a head...

I don't see how anyone can look at these two covers and think they are the same part.  It isn't odd the engine has a head, cylinder, crankcase, clutch cover, etc.  That doesn't mean KTM or one of it's affiliates manufactured it.

image-20230830140444-1

The general visual comparison is not to that KTM, but the previous generation:

The general visual comparison is not to that KTM, but the previous generation:

2021-KTM-250-SX-F-4 0

BigIron wrote:
Design queues, maybe.  Still not the same.

Design queues, maybe.  Still not the same.

image-20230830164048-1

It purely visually looks to be the "same" in the way that a 2004+ RM 250 and YZ250 are the "same" -- where the Zook design was largely a functional clone of the YZ, but obviously a fully different motor made by a different builder.

5

Post a reply to: Triumph,Wtf are you doing?..

The Latest