Please log in first.

Start_new_topic

Participating Members

Canon 7D

oilman400 Posts: 35 Joined: 4/01/2008 Location: Winters, Ca	9/28/2009 6:49 PM oilman400 wrote: I've been using a Canon 20D and i think i'm ready for un upgrade. Any thoughts on new 7D would be great. Thanks Marty oilman400 wrote: I've been using a Canon 20D and i think i'm ready for un upgrade. Any thoughts on new 7D would be great. Thanks Marty Quote Last Post Only I've been using a Canon 20D and i think i'm ready for un upgrade. Any thoughts on new 7D would be great. Thanks Marty
FreshTopEnd Posts: 2258 Joined: 8/16/2006 Location: Sacramento, CA	9/29/2009 12:16 PM FreshTopEnd wrote: It's probably going to be a nice camera. IMO, which has been stated and argued about elsewhere, if you are primarily shooting MX and have a budget for a body around the price of a new 7d, you ought to consider a clean 1DmkII or mkIIN. The non "N" is going for around a grand here in Norcal. FreshTopEnd wrote: It's probably going to be a nice camera. IMO, which has been stated and argued about elsewhere, if you are primarily shooting MX and have a budget for a body around the price of a new 7d, you ought to consider a clean 1DmkII or mkIIN. The non "N" is going for around a grand here in Norcal. Quote Last Post Only It's probably going to be a nice camera. IMO, which has been stated and argued about elsewhere, if you are primarily shooting MX and have a budget for a body around the price of a new 7d, you ought to consider a clean 1DmkII or mkIIN. The non "N" is going for around a grand here in Norcal. www.ftemoto.com
oilman400 Posts: 35 Joined: 4/01/2008 Location: Winters, Ca	10/1/2009 6:52 PM oilman400 wrote: Thanks FTE, won't be shooting to much MX as this is just my hobby but i have a grand son almost ready for BMX. The 20D with an older 80-200 2.8 L (black) dosn't focus real well in fast sports. I allways manual focus in MX (lots of practice with the old T90 and a 300 2.8 FD velvia days) and was woundering if the new 7D and a new 80-200 2.8 is would track faster? I also like the larger display (eyes are getting bad) and shoots HD video. Thanks Marty oilman400 wrote: Thanks FTE, won't be shooting to much MX as this is just my hobby but i have a grand son almost ready for BMX. The 20D with an older 80-200 2.8 L (black) dosn't focus real well in fast sports. I allways manual focus in MX (lots of practice with the old T90 and a 300 2.8 FD velvia days) and was woundering if the new 7D and a new 80-200 2.8 is would track faster? I also like the larger display (eyes are getting bad) and shoots HD video. Thanks Marty Quote Last Post Only Thanks FTE, won't be shooting to much MX as this is just my hobby but i have a grand son almost ready for BMX. The 20D with an older 80-200 2.8 L (black) dosn't focus real well in fast sports. I allways manual focus in MX (lots of practice with the old T90 and a 300 2.8 FD velvia days) and was woundering if the new 7D and a new 80-200 2.8 is would track faster? I also like the larger display (eyes are getting bad) and shoots HD video. Thanks Marty
ronronmx Posts: 46 Joined: 3/25/2008 Location: PHOENIX, AZ	10/1/2009 9:26 PM ronronmx wrote: I would say the new 7D is a better camera then a 1D markII imo. Newer chipset, newer digic 4, bigger resolution...read the specs of both cameras and what they can do. I would buy a 7D over a 1D markII. ronronmx wrote: I would say the new 7D is a better camera then a 1D markII imo. Newer chipset, newer digic 4, bigger resolution...read the specs of both cameras and what they can do. I would buy a 7D over a 1D markII. Quote Last Post Only I would say the new 7D is a better camera then a 1D markII imo. Newer chipset, newer digic 4, bigger resolution...read the specs of both cameras and what they can do. I would buy a 7D over a 1D markII. Stephane "Ronron" Roncada * Retired professional racer - *#21* * Proud professional daddy * Ronronmx.com - My personal site * 2xl Supercross Game - My latest game, for the iPhone
oilman400 Posts: 35 Joined: 4/01/2008 Location: Winters, Ca	10/3/2009 1:57 PM oilman400 wrote: Thanks Stephane, The 2xl game rocks! I can't belive my Iphone has an MX game that is so fun. When i first saw it i thought a phone mx game would be a joke but its a must have. oilman400 wrote: Thanks Stephane, The 2xl game rocks! I can't belive my Iphone has an MX game that is so fun. When i first saw it i thought a phone mx game would be a joke but its a must have. Quote Last Post Only Thanks Stephane, The 2xl game rocks! I can't belive my Iphone has an MX game that is so fun. When i first saw it i thought a phone mx game would be a joke but its a must have.
oilman400 Posts: 35 Joined: 4/01/2008 Location: Winters, Ca	10/3/2009 2:03 PM oilman400 wrote: How much difference would an older 80-200 2.8 L (72mm) black lens (10 years old ?) and a newer 70-200 2.8 is L ? I'm thinking about buying a used one, anything to watch out for? oilman400 wrote: How much difference would an older 80-200 2.8 L (72mm) black lens (10 years old ?) and a newer 70-200 2.8 is L ? I'm thinking about buying a used one, anything to watch out for? Quote Last Post Only How much difference would an older 80-200 2.8 L (72mm) black lens (10 years old ?) and a newer 70-200 2.8 is L ? I'm thinking about buying a used one, anything to watch out for?
cudby Posts: 103 Joined: 8/30/2006 Location: Trabuco Canyon, CA Uni	10/3/2009 8:20 PM cudby wrote: I have a 7D. The video is great. The stills are about the same quality as my Canon 1DS Mark 2. Not up to the quality of the 1DS Mark 3 though. Noise at high iso (1600 and 3200) is about equal to the 1DS Mark 2. The AF is fast. Simon cudby wrote: I have a 7D. The video is great. The stills are about the same quality as my Canon 1DS Mark 2. Not up to the quality of the 1DS Mark 3 though. Noise at high iso (1600 and 3200) is about equal to the 1DS Mark 2. The AF is fast. Simon Quote Last Post Only I have a 7D. The video is great. The stills are about the same quality as my Canon 1DS Mark 2. Not up to the quality of the 1DS Mark 3 though. Noise at high iso (1600 and 3200) is about equal to the 1DS Mark 2. The AF is fast. Simon
Paul Buckley Posts: 227 Joined: 10/29/2007 Location: ,	10/5/2009 12:23 PM oilman400 wrote: How much difference would an older 80-200 2.8 L (72mm) black lens (10 years old ?) and a newer 70-200 2.8 is L ? I'm thinking about buying a used one, anything to watch out for? oilman400 wrote: How much difference would an older 80-200 2.8 L (72mm) black lens (10 years old ?) and a newer 70-200 2.8 is L ? I'm thinking about buying a used one, anything to watch out for? Paul Buckley wrote: It's night and day, the black lens has the old style focus motor (AFD) while the white ones are Ultra sonic powered, you'll be amazed. Find one a doctor or dentist is selling and not one from an MX shooter or if you do get one from one of us have it checked out at Canon. Quote Last Post Only Paul Buckley wrote: It's night and day, the black lens has the old style focus motor (AFD) while the white ones are Ultra sonic powered, you'll be amazed. Find one a doctor or dentist is selling and not one from an MX shooter or if you do get one from one of us have it checked out at Canon. Quote Last Post Only It's night and day, the black lens has the old style focus motor (AFD) while the white ones are Ultra sonic powered, you'll be amazed. Find one a doctor or dentist is selling and not one from an MX shooter or if you do get one from one of us have it checked out at Canon. Lots of new photos in the classics section
eddie Posts: 1226 Joined: 4/01/2008 Location: Franciacorta, ITA	10/30/2009 7:16 PM eddie wrote: Canon Service Notice Service Notice: EOS 7D: Residual Image in Picture We have confirmed that in certain camera settings and shooting conditions, the phenomenon described below may occur in images captured by the EOS 7D Digital SLR camera. Canon is currently investigating and analyzing the cause of this phenomenon, and we are planning to release a firmware update to address this issue. Once the support measures have been established, we will post the relevant information on our Web site. We offer our most sincere apologies to customers using this product who have been inconvenienced by this issue. Going forward, we will spare no effort in our quality management to make sure our customers can use our products with confidence. We hope our efforts will earn your understanding. Phenomenon In images captured by continuous shooting, and under certain conditions, barely noticeable traces of the immediately preceding frame may be visible. This phenomenon is not noticeable in an image with optimal exposure. The phenomenon may become more noticeable if a retouching process such as level compensation is applied to emphasize the image. Affected Product EOS 7D Digital SLR Support This contact information is for residents of the United States and Puerto Rico only. If you do not reside in the USA or Puerto Rico, please contact the Canon Customer Support Center in your region. eddie wrote: Canon Service Notice Service Notice: EOS 7D: Residual Image in Picture We have confirmed that in certain camera settings and shooting conditions, the phenomenon described below may occur in images captured by the EOS 7D Digital SLR camera. Canon is currently investigating and analyzing the cause of this phenomenon, and we are planning to release a firmware update to address this issue. Once the support measures have been established, we will post the relevant information on our Web site. We offer our most sincere apologies to customers using this product who have been inconvenienced by this issue. Going forward, we will spare no effort in our quality management to make sure our customers can use our products with confidence. We hope our efforts will earn your understanding. Phenomenon In images captured by continuous shooting, and under certain conditions, barely noticeable traces of the immediately preceding frame may be visible. This phenomenon is not noticeable in an image with optimal exposure. The phenomenon may become more noticeable if a retouching process such as level compensation is applied to emphasize the image. Affected Product EOS 7D Digital SLR Support This contact information is for residents of the United States and Puerto Rico only. If you do not reside in the USA or Puerto Rico, please contact the Canon Customer Support Center in your region. Quote Last Post Only Canon Service Notice Service Notice: EOS 7D: Residual Image in Picture We have confirmed that in certain camera settings and shooting conditions, the phenomenon described below may occur in images captured by the EOS 7D Digital SLR camera. Canon is currently investigating and analyzing the cause of this phenomenon, and we are planning to release a firmware update to address this issue. Once the support measures have been established, we will post the relevant information on our Web site. We offer our most sincere apologies to customers using this product who have been inconvenienced by this issue. Going forward, we will spare no effort in our quality management to make sure our customers can use our products with confidence. We hope our efforts will earn your understanding. Phenomenon In images captured by continuous shooting, and under certain conditions, barely noticeable traces of the immediately preceding frame may be visible. This phenomenon is not noticeable in an image with optimal exposure. The phenomenon may become more noticeable if a retouching process such as level compensation is applied to emphasize the image. Affected Product EOS 7D Digital SLR Support This contact information is for residents of the United States and Puerto Rico only. If you do not reside in the USA or Puerto Rico, please contact the Canon Customer Support Center in your region.

Post a Reply to: Canon 7D