Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
Pretty fast bike stock, won Unadilla MX rewind twice with a stock motor, Personally I have been building motors for some 30 plus years saw a lot of different setups go conservative, the smart builders do the math before they put a tool to a cylinder, if you want to see a cylinder set up for porting look at the post 79 RM250 I recently uploaded
The Shop
it also had the timing retarded compared to the 82 model. Do both and
it does hit a lot harder but I felt less wheelspin on the 83 with its heavier
crank (which I liked), the 82 head is pretty picky on octane though,
which is one drawback.
I really liked a head I had done by R&D (Rudy & Dean), they cut a "pocket"
at the back of the combustion chamber that went into the squish area to help
hold the charge from the transfers for better combustion, then milled & reshaped
it to bring the compression back-this was my take on their explanation, it worked
great I do know that & much happier with pump gas.
There is a lot of room for blueprint work on the cylinders, most exhaust mods
would be pretty modest I would expect with the unbridged ex. port. At that time
I did not have any two stroke software to evaluate the porting, this is only an opinion,
but in retrospect, I feel there may be too much transfer port area which would need
epoxy to correct. Eric Gorr or Brent @ TDC? performance use this method. If
anyone you talk to want to make the already generous sized Boyesen ports big
enough to shove golf balls through....I would run away! lol
Post a reply to: 82 rm250z porting advive/ specs