Michelle Obama says I am amazing!

It must be working better than the down home "you people" approach of Ann Romney.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/romney-losing-presidential-campaign-donations

I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I don't get that sense of sincerity when I listen to Queen Ann speak. Call me crazy, but she just comes off as kind of uppity. Maybe that's why the overwhelming majority of money donated to Willard is coming from large donors, who think that's normal rather than the "you people" levels of $3 and $5 at a whack.

Crashinskinoff wrote: She could feel my energy! Check it out, i am on their mailing list so i can try to figure out how they are brain washing the sheep. It's a constant barrage of you got 5 dollars? How about 3 mo dollars? What a bunch of bums!

Mike, thank you for an amazing week.

Barack and I felt your energy up there.

But we can't let that energy fade -- because in just 60 days, voters will decide who gets to serve in the White House for the next four years. So every single one of us has got to pull together to finish strong.

I know you feel the urgency: Already this week, supporters like you have made more than 500,000 grassroots donations to build this campaign. So if you're fired up, let's keep it going -- let's see how many people we can get to show their support by the end of the day.

Can you chip in $5 or more to stand with Barack today?

Barack's got something that the other side doesn't: more than 3 million grassroots supporters like you -- and together we're going to win this election the right way.

The donation you give today will make a big impact in the final stage of this race. And on November 7th, you can wake knowing that you did everything you could to help us deliver on the full promise of the next four years.

Make this our biggest week yet, and give $5 or more right now to win this election in the final two months:

https://donate.barackobama.com/Our-Week

Thank you,

Michelle

Five bucks? What happened to the $30,000.00 dinner with the stars?

oldfart wrote: It must be working better than the down home "you people" approach of Ann Romney.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/romney-losing-presidential-campaign-donations

I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I don't get that sense of sincerity when I listen to Queen Ann speak. Call me crazy, but she just comes off as kind of uppity. Maybe that's why the overwhelming majority of money donated to Willard is coming from large donors, who think that's normal rather than the "you people" levels of $3 and $5 at a whack.

I'm sure you didn't have a preconceived notion before you heard her speak, right?

Crashinskinoff wrote: She could feel my energy! Check it out, i am on their mailing list so i can try to figure out how they are brain washing the sheep. It's a constant barrage of you got 5 dollars? How about 3 mo dollars? What a bunch of bums!

Mike, thank you for an amazing week.

Barack and I felt your energy up there.

But we can't let that energy fade -- because in just 60 days, voters will decide who gets to serve in the White House for the next four years. So every single one of us has got to pull together to finish strong.

I know you feel the urgency: Already this week, supporters like you have made more than 500,000 grassroots donations to build this campaign. So if you're fired up, let's keep it going -- let's see how many people we can get to show their support by the end of the day.

Can you chip in $5 or more to stand with Barack today?

Barack's got something that the other side doesn't: more than 3 million grassroots supporters like you -- and together we're going to win this election the right way.

The donation you give today will make a big impact in the final stage of this race. And on November 7th, you can wake knowing that you did everything you could to help us deliver on the full promise of the next four years.

Make this our biggest week yet, and give $5 or more right now to win this election in the final two months:

https://donate.barackobama.com/Our-Week

Thank you,

Michelle

newmann wrote: Five bucks? What happened to the $30,000.00 dinner with the stars?

LOL on that one you put in 3 bucks and were eligible for a drawing for dinner with the stars! Seriously get on the list it's great for entertainment. Joe and the gang all email you.

oldfart wrote: It must be working better than the down home "you people" approach of Ann Romney.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/romney-losing-presidential-campaign-donations

I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I don't get that sense of sincerity when I listen to Queen Ann speak. Call me crazy, but she just comes off as kind of uppity. Maybe that's why the overwhelming majority of money donated to Willard is coming from large donors, who think that's normal rather than the "you people" levels of $3 and $5 at a whack.

Mother Jones awesome hate site! lol. 3 dollars 5 dollars, the are taking money from people who don't have nothing and lying to their face to get it, awesome.

oldfart wrote: It must be working better than the down home "you people" approach of Ann Romney.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/romney-losing-presidential-campaign-donations

I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I don't get that sense of sincerity when I listen to Queen Ann speak. Call me crazy, but she just comes off as kind of uppity. Maybe that's why the overwhelming majority of money donated to Willard is coming from large donors, who think that's normal rather than the "you people" levels of $3 and $5 at a whack.

People buy their facts from where they are. A self sufficient pro entrepreneurial conservative type will listen to Ann and maybe be a little inspired, maybe not. A Liberal type will listen to her and the message will seem unreal or condescending.

oldfart wrote: It must be working better than the down home "you people" approach of Ann Romney.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/romney-losing-presidential-campaign-donations

I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I don't get that sense of sincerity when I listen to Queen Ann speak. Call me crazy, but she just comes off as kind of uppity. Maybe that's why the overwhelming majority of money donated to Willard is coming from large donors, who think that's normal rather than the "you people" levels of $3 and $5 at a whack.

Crashinskinoff wrote: Mother Jones awesome hate site! lol. 3 dollars 5 dollars, the are taking money from people who don't have nothing and lying to their face to get it, awesome.

Um, Willard spent a small fortune trying to obtain those same size donations, specifically in order to boost their small donor numbers. In fact, he chased those small dollars at a loss even. It didn't work, the numbers still say the majority of money to the Willard campaign comes in the way of a small number of large donors, whereas Obama is getting large numbers of small donors. I'm no rocket scientist, I don't even play one on TV, but I'd say that's a bad sign for Willard, yes? Not only is Obama taking in MORE money than Willard now, but he's doing so by way of small donors.

There's lots of real numbers in that article Crash. Numbers don't hate.

oldfart wrote: It must be working better than the down home "you people" approach of Ann Romney.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/romney-losing-presidential-campaign-donations

I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I don't get that sense of sincerity when I listen to Queen Ann speak. Call me crazy, but she just comes off as kind of uppity. Maybe that's why the overwhelming majority of money donated to Willard is coming from large donors, who think that's normal rather than the "you people" levels of $3 and $5 at a whack.

Crashinskinoff wrote: Mother Jones awesome hate site! lol. 3 dollars 5 dollars, the are taking money from people who don't have nothing and lying to their face to get it, awesome.

oldfart wrote: Um, Willard spent a small fortune trying to obtain those same size donations, specifically in order to boost their small donor numbers. In fact, he chased those small dollars at a loss even. It didn't work, the numbers still say the majority of money to the Willard campaign comes in the way of a small number of large donors, whereas Obama is getting large numbers of small donors. I'm no rocket scientist, I don't even play one on TV, but I'd say that's a bad sign for Willard, yes? Not only is Obama taking in MORE money than Willard now, but he's doing so by way of small donors.

There's lots of real numbers in that article Crash. Numbers don't hate.

Are you able to charge that five bucks directly to your EBT card? If so, I think we've solved the small-donor riddle.

14 of the 20 largest campaign donors over the last 20+ years are Democratic donors. The largest Republican-leaning donor gave about 25% of the amount of money to Republicans than the Dems. got from their largest donor.




In other words, oldfart is as full of shit as he ever was.

vet323 wrote: 14 of the 20 largest campaign donors over the last 20+ years are Democratic donors. The largest Republican-leaning donor gave about 25% of the amount of money to Republicans than the Dems. got from their largest donor.




In other words, oldfart is as full of shit as he ever was.

So, roughly 2/3 of the largest donations over the last 20+ years are Democratic donors? Let's see. considering we've had a democratic POTUS for about 2/3 of those last 20 years, sounds like you're just making shit up again to fit your agenda? How Republican of you.

They even put pictures of donkeys and elephants next to 'em for simple folk like of!

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

This is pretty simple too, although not nearly as misleading as your erroneous claim.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/11/sheldon-adelson-2-billion-tax-cut-mitt-romney_n_1873683.html

Adelson has vowed to spend as much as $100 million to help sway the 2012 election. According to a new report by Seth Hanlon, the director of fiscal reform at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, Adelson could turn that investment into a $2 billion tax cut if Romney is elected.

vet323 wrote: They even put pictures of donkeys and elephants next to 'em for simple folk like of!

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

Your list is ALL donors, not just big money donors.

"We're not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact-checkers"

This is a little more relevant.

Obama donors.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?cycle=2012&id=N00009638

Willard donors. NOTE: 18 of top 20 are Financial firms
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?cycle=2012&id=N00000286

oldfart wrote: This is a little more relevant.

Obama donors.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?cycle=2012&id=N00009638

Willard donors. NOTE: 18 of top 20 are Financial firms
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?cycle=2012&id=N00000286

What's more relevant? That Romney's top 20 donor gave him less money than President Obama's?

I heard that M Obama gave a great speech, but A Romney´s was rookie like and not that good? I did not see them my self, so I cant say what I think, but I heard political reporters talking about it on the radio. Do Romney fans in general agree?

oldfart wrote: This is a little more relevant.

Obama donors.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?cycle=2012&id=N00009638

Willard donors. NOTE: 18 of top 20 are Financial firms
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?cycle=2012&id=N00000286

vet323 wrote: What's more relevant? That Romney's top 20 donor gave him less money than President Obama's?

No, the reality is Willard's top 16 donors gave more than Obama's top 16 donors.

Is it because all Republicans can't read? Or are they all blind? Or do they all just make shit up?

Might be all three, but I'm going with the last option.

"a new era of truth"

oldfart wrote: No, the reality is Willard's top 16 donors gave more than Obama's top 16 donors.

Is it because all Republicans can't read? Or are they all blind? Or do they all just make shit up?

Might be all three, but I'm going with the last option.

"a new era of truth"

When did you become a team player again? You made so much sense a few months ago... Now you've abandoned those principles that you said you wouldn't. Your number one concern was audit the FED.... Now it's to prove Romney is a liar. Guess what, most of us know that, yet you pretend Obama isn't. You've lost site of the true culprits and joined a side.

vet323 wrote: What's more relevant? That Romney's top 20 donor gave him less money than President Obama's?

oldfart wrote: No, the reality is Willard's top 16 donors gave more than Obama's top 16 donors.

Is it because all Republicans can't read? Or are they all blind? Or do they all just make shit up?

Might be all three, but I'm going with the last option.

"a new era of truth"

rc4187 wrote: When did you become a team player again? You made so much sense a few months ago... Now you've abandoned those principles that you said you wouldn't. Your number one concern was audit the FED.... Now it's to prove Romney is a liar. Guess what, most of us know that, yet you pretend Obama isn't. You've lost site of the true culprits and joined a side.

Never have been that team player, so not sure what I'm going back to? I'm taking a tip from Mitch McConnell, my number one priority is to make sure Willard is a ZERO term President.

So do you guys think i'm amazing? Is Michelle lying to me to get my money?

10 bucks and you get to choose your car magnet!

Pick out your favorite car magnet
Everyone appreciates options. Any one of these Obama 2012 car magnets makes for a stylish ride. And they look great on the fridge, too.
Made in America.
Donate $10 or more today and we'll send you your favorite.
Choose your magnet:
White "Vote Obama"
Blue "2012"
Red, White, and Blue "Retro"

https://contribute.barackobama.com/donation/magnet-choice/08/ovf.html?utm_medium=email&utm_source=obama&utm_content=img+srchttpsecureassetsbostaticcomemail20120902merchejpg++altDonate+10+or+more+and+get+your+choice+of+magnet+border0+height450+width580&utm_campaign=em12_20120909_ofa_nd&source=em12_20120909_ofa_nd

I like the White "vote obama" one!

https://contribute.barackobama.com/donation/magnet-choice/08/ovf.html

Link no worky, I got me one on order!

https://secure.mittromney.com/donate/donald

oldfart wrote: It must be working better than the down home "you people" approach of Ann Romney.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/romney-losing-presidential-campaign-donations

I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I don't get that sense of sincerity when I listen to Queen Ann speak. Call me crazy, but she just comes off as kind of uppity. Maybe that's why the overwhelming majority of money donated to Willard is coming from large donors, who think that's normal rather than the "you people" levels of $3 and $5 at a whack.

I have not read but the first 2 posts. The first post quotes Michelle Obama and an idea, and your post sends us to a website.

Good golly man, please put letters together to makes sentences. Sentences make thoughts/ideas. Please come up with a creative thought.

oldfart wrote: It must be working better than the down home "you people" approach of Ann Romney.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/romney-losing-presidential-campaign-donations

I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I don't get that sense of sincerity when I listen to Queen Ann speak. Call me crazy, but she just comes off as kind of uppity. Maybe that's why the overwhelming majority of money donated to Willard is coming from large donors, who think that's normal rather than the "you people" levels of $3 and $5 at a whack.

I have only read but the first 2 posts before I posted this......I will not pour through hours (actually minutes of bullshit) of distaste from Old Fart. I can cut to the chase. The first post quotes Michelle Obama and an idea, and your post (Old fart) sends us to a website. If you cannot learn from your websites that you continually post, and repost, in your own words, I lose tremendous respect of your knowledge of the whole situation.

,,,,and it is an insulting terminology. (Queen Ann) Just where do you get off being so insolent? (Showing a rude or arrogant lack of respect.)


Good golly man, please put your own thoughts together to make sentences. ....and use those Sentences to make thoughts/ideas. Please come up with a few creative, meaningful thoughts and ideas.

I stand on the sidelines for you to WOW us with your brilliant ideas. (Please do not tell me to read a link)

Edit: I really hope you are 17 years old. If this is the case, rock on buddy, you are very smart, I think you are brilliant and the country is in a positive direction. If you are 40, I feel really sad. The problem with this is that you will never tell us who(m)? you really are.

Crashinskinoff wrote: She could feel my energy! Check it out, i am on their mailing list so i can try to figure out how they are brain washing the sheep. It's a constant barrage of you got 5 dollars? How about 3 mo dollars? What a bunch of bums!

Mike, thank you for an amazing week.

Barack and I felt your energy up there.

But we can't let that energy fade -- because in just 60 days, voters will decide who gets to serve in the White House for the next four years. So every single one of us has got to pull together to finish strong.

I know you feel the urgency: Already this week, supporters like you have made more than 500,000 grassroots donations to build this campaign. So if you're fired up, let's keep it going -- let's see how many people we can get to show their support by the end of the day.

Can you chip in $5 or more to stand with Barack today?

Barack's got something that the other side doesn't: more than 3 million grassroots supporters like you -- and together we're going to win this election the right way.

The donation you give today will make a big impact in the final stage of this race. And on November 7th, you can wake knowing that you did everything you could to help us deliver on the full promise of the next four years.

Make this our biggest week yet, and give $5 or more right now to win this election in the final two months:

https://donate.barackobama.com/Our-Week

Thank you,

Michelle

Sooooo, how exactly do you propose that they raise money?


P

oldfart wrote: It must be working better than the down home "you people" approach of Ann Romney.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/romney-losing-presidential-campaign-donations

I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I don't get that sense of sincerity when I listen to Queen Ann speak. Call me crazy, but she just comes off as kind of uppity. Maybe that's why the overwhelming majority of money donated to Willard is coming from large donors, who think that's normal rather than the "you people" levels of $3 and $5 at a whack.

teggers wrote: I have only read but the first 2 posts before I posted this......I will not pour through hours (actually minutes of bullshit) of distaste from Old Fart. I can cut to the chase. The first post quotes Michelle Obama and an idea, and your post (Old fart) sends us to a website. If you cannot learn from your websites that you continually post, and repost, in your own words, I lose tremendous respect of your knowledge of the whole situation.

,,,,and it is an insulting terminology. (Queen Ann) Just where do you get off being so insolent? (Showing a rude or arrogant lack of respect.)


Good golly man, please put your own thoughts together to make sentences. ....and use those Sentences to make thoughts/ideas. Please come up with a few creative, meaningful thoughts and ideas.

I stand on the sidelines for you to WOW us with your brilliant ideas. (Please do not tell me to read a link)

Edit: I really hope you are 17 years old. If this is the case, rock on buddy, you are very smart, I think you are brilliant and the country is in a positive direction. If you are 40, I feel really sad. The problem with this is that you will never tell us who(m)? you really are.

Just vote for Willard already Tim. Stop the charade and proclaim your love for all things Willard. Just don't come whining to me when you discover your mistake later on.

Some of us stood by our principles when it mattered.