Start_new_topic

Participating Members

Classic SX Video (must see)

« Previous 1 2 Next »

roosty Posts: 2987 Joined: 5/17/2008 Location: BEND, OR	10/24/2009 11:34 PM roosty wrote: Holley stylin it out. roosty wrote: Holley stylin it out. Quote Last Post Only Holley stylin it out. "I always tell the truth.... even when I lie"
rc4187 Posts: 689 Joined: 4/01/2008 Location: , washington	10/24/2009 11:46 PM rc4187 wrote: That was good stuff. Thanks for the post. The track was great. rc4187 wrote: That was good stuff. Thanks for the post. The track was great. Quote Last Post Only That was good stuff. Thanks for the post. The track was great.
BAD10 Posts: 63 Joined: 1/03/2009 Location: SAN DIEGO, CA	10/24/2009 11:51 PM BAD10 wrote: Cool. I grew up in the 80's and all those guys were my heros.....great era. But I gotta be honest, and I know I'm gonna get roosted for this, but compared to todays SX riders, the 80's racers look like novices. And the "crossup"? LOL.. Bikes? Tracks? or Riders? BAD10 wrote: Cool. I grew up in the 80's and all those guys were my heros.....great era. But I gotta be honest, and I know I'm gonna get roosted for this, but compared to todays SX riders, the 80's racers look like novices. And the "crossup"? LOL.. Bikes? Tracks? or Riders? Quote Last Post Only Cool. I grew up in the 80's and all those guys were my heros.....great era. But I gotta be honest, and I know I'm gonna get roosted for this, but compared to todays SX riders, the 80's racers look like novices. And the "crossup"? LOL.. Bikes? Tracks? or Riders? www.speedzonepaint.com
DD410 Posts: 131 Joined: 9/02/2009 Location: SANTA PAULA, CA	10/25/2009 12:21 AM Edited Date/Time: 10/25/2009 12:22 AM DD410 wrote: Hahahaha!!!! Im friends with jim but only time ive seen him ride was at lacr like a year ago on a old yz250. what a nut! he always gives me crap for whipping it. LOL DD410 wrote: Hahahaha!!!! Im friends with jim but only time ive seen him ride was at lacr like a year ago on a old yz250. what a nut! he always gives me crap for whipping it. LOL Quote Last Post Only Hahahaha!!!! Im friends with jim but only time ive seen him ride was at lacr like a year ago on a old yz250. what a nut! he always gives me crap for whipping it. LOL www.myspace.com/dd410mx
Hank_Thrill Posts: 278 Joined: 9/22/2008 Location: Arlen, TX	10/25/2009 12:37 AM Hank_Thrill wrote: Open face helmets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111 YEAH! Hank_Thrill wrote: Open face helmets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111 YEAH! Quote Last Post Only Open face helmets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111 YEAH! ~H.Thrill
felpro Posts: 164 Joined: 8/03/2009 Location: Dural, AUS	10/25/2009 12:37 AM felpro wrote: I see it the same. I was thinking about the difference in suspension as they take a beating through the whoops. Now it is so much more clinical. What about Holley's bars ... so far back !! Those guys were flying though, even though it does look like a novice race by today's standards. How good is the racing though, when the guys running 1st and 2nd are doing different jump sequences ... Awesome !! felpro wrote: I see it the same. I was thinking about the difference in suspension as they take a beating through the whoops. Now it is so much more clinical. What about Holley's bars ... so far back !! Those guys were flying though, even though it does look like a novice race by today's standards. How good is the racing though, when the guys running 1st and 2nd are doing different jump sequences ... Awesome !! Quote Last Post Only I see it the same. I was thinking about the difference in suspension as they take a beating through the whoops. Now it is so much more clinical. What about Holley's bars ... so far back !! Those guys were flying though, even though it does look like a novice race by today's standards. How good is the racing though, when the guys running 1st and 2nd are doing different jump sequences ... Awesome !! Chad's 2009 secret weapon:
Hank_Thrill Posts: 278 Joined: 9/22/2008 Location: Arlen, TX	10/25/2009 12:54 AM Edited Date/Time: 10/25/2009 12:58 AM BAD10 wrote: Cool. I grew up in the 80's and all those guys were my heros.....great era. But I gotta be honest, and I know I'm gonna get roosted for this, but compared to todays SX riders, the 80's racers look like novices. And the "crossup"? LOL.. Bikes? Tracks? or Riders? BAD10 wrote: Cool. I grew up in the 80's and all those guys were my heros.....great era. But I gotta be honest, and I know I'm gonna get roosted for this, but compared to todays SX riders, the 80's racers look like novices. And the "crossup"? LOL.. Bikes? Tracks? or Riders? Hank_Thrill wrote: I have a theory on this: 1) the suspension on those bikes appears to blow! I obviously have never ridden a 1980's bike with factory suspension, but it seems like dialing in a stock set-up from 2000 and on would work better than their "factory" suspension. 2) Track technology was obviously terrible compared today's standards. Those jumps and landings look steep! 3) This is the third and most interesting part to me, and the toughest one to figure out, or prove, is psychological barriers. In a visible way, yes they appear less skilled, but we have to realize they were at the forefront of motocross evolution. Those riders don't have weaker genes than riders today, or less potential. It's just that humans progress each other as a whole. I'm sure people back then couldn't imagine people going any faster than that. But nobody was there to show them the way. Groups have a big impact on individuals, and if a group sees one person do something, they know it's possible, and the higher percentage of people in that group doing that something, the less likely members of that group will have psychological barriers towards it. It is really interesting, but motocross riders as a whole function as a whole, and progress & evolve as a whole. If a beginner goes to a track and sees 50 people jumping a double in 2009 that would be deemed insane in the 80's, he's going to have better odds of thinking it's easy, vs. a situation where only 2 other people on the track are doing it (especially compounded with what he sees other riders doing on the telvision these days). A perfect example of this is the bubba scrub. I remember Mike LaRocco and RC talking about practicing it back in 2005. Now damn near every amateur does it, which fuels more amateurs to know it's possible... I'm not trying to sound like a know it all. I'm not, I just like applying social-psychology theories to motocross. This stuff is very fascinating to me. Quote Last Post Only Hank_Thrill wrote: I have a theory on this: 1) the suspension on those bikes appears to blow! I obviously have never ridden a 1980's bike with factory suspension, but it seems like dialing in a stock set-up from 2000 and on would work better than their "factory" suspension. 2) Track technology was obviously terrible compared today's standards. Those jumps and landings look steep! 3) This is the third and most interesting part to me, and the toughest one to figure out, or prove, is psychological barriers. In a visible way, yes they appear less skilled, but we have to realize they were at the forefront of motocross evolution. Those riders don't have weaker genes than riders today, or less potential. It's just that humans progress each other as a whole. I'm sure people back then couldn't imagine people going any faster than that. But nobody was there to show them the way. Groups have a big impact on individuals, and if a group sees one person do something, they know it's possible, and the higher percentage of people in that group doing that something, the less likely members of that group will have psychological barriers towards it. It is really interesting, but motocross riders as a whole function as a whole, and progress & evolve as a whole. If a beginner goes to a track and sees 50 people jumping a double in 2009 that would be deemed insane in the 80's, he's going to have better odds of thinking it's easy, vs. a situation where only 2 other people on the track are doing it (especially compounded with what he sees other riders doing on the telvision these days). A perfect example of this is the bubba scrub. I remember Mike LaRocco and RC talking about practicing it back in 2005. Now damn near every amateur does it, which fuels more amateurs to know it's possible... I'm not trying to sound like a know it all. I'm not, I just like applying social-psychology theories to motocross. This stuff is very fascinating to me. Quote Last Post Only I have a theory on this: 1) the suspension on those bikes appears to blow! I obviously have never ridden a 1980's bike with factory suspension, but it seems like dialing in a stock set-up from 2000 and on would work better than their "factory" suspension. 2) Track technology was obviously terrible compared today's standards. Those jumps and landings look steep! 3) This is the third and most interesting part to me, and the toughest one to figure out, or prove, is psychological barriers. In a visible way, yes they appear less skilled, but we have to realize they were at the forefront of motocross evolution. Those riders don't have weaker genes than riders today, or less potential. It's just that humans progress each other as a whole. I'm sure people back then couldn't imagine people going any faster than that. But nobody was there to show them the way. Groups have a big impact on individuals, and if a group sees one person do something, they know it's possible, and the higher percentage of people in that group doing that something, the less likely members of that group will have psychological barriers towards it. It is really interesting, but motocross riders as a whole function as a whole, and progress & evolve as a whole. If a beginner goes to a track and sees 50 people jumping a double in 2009 that would be deemed insane in the 80's, he's going to have better odds of thinking it's easy, vs. a situation where only 2 other people on the track are doing it (especially compounded with what he sees other riders doing on the telvision these days). A perfect example of this is the bubba scrub. I remember Mike LaRocco and RC talking about practicing it back in 2005. Now damn near every amateur does it, which fuels more amateurs to know it's possible... I'm not trying to sound like a know it all. I'm not, I just like applying social-psychology theories to motocross. This stuff is very fascinating to me. ~H.Thrill
jemcee Posts: 145 Joined: 8/11/2008 Location: , AUS	10/25/2009 2:36 AM BAD10 wrote: Cool. I grew up in the 80's and all those guys were my heros.....great era. But I gotta be honest, and I know I'm gonna get roosted for this, but compared to todays SX riders, the 80's racers look like novices. And the "crossup"? LOL.. Bikes? Tracks? or Riders? BAD10 wrote: Cool. I grew up in the 80's and all those guys were my heros.....great era. But I gotta be honest, and I know I'm gonna get roosted for this, but compared to todays SX riders, the 80's racers look like novices. And the "crossup"? LOL.. Bikes? Tracks? or Riders? jemcee wrote: yeah i don't know man, i reckon put any of the guys from now on those bikes on that track they wouldn't look a lot different those tracks weren't made to keep the riders happy with flow plus my brother who rode those bikes tells me the suspension was a horror to set cause the shock would pack up and get really hard or rebound heaps (i think thats what he used to say, he used to go on a bit ha) Quote Last Post Only jemcee wrote: yeah i don't know man, i reckon put any of the guys from now on those bikes on that track they wouldn't look a lot different those tracks weren't made to keep the riders happy with flow plus my brother who rode those bikes tells me the suspension was a horror to set cause the shock would pack up and get really hard or rebound heaps (i think thats what he used to say, he used to go on a bit ha) Quote Last Post Only yeah i don't know man, i reckon put any of the guys from now on those bikes on that track they wouldn't look a lot different those tracks weren't made to keep the riders happy with flow plus my brother who rode those bikes tells me the suspension was a horror to set cause the shock would pack up and get really hard or rebound heaps (i think thats what he used to say, he used to go on a bit ha)
roosty Posts: 2987 Joined: 5/17/2008 Location: BEND, OR	10/25/2009 9:17 AM roosty wrote: The racing was exciting, and a lot funner to watch IMO. That track was badass!!! roosty wrote: The racing was exciting, and a lot funner to watch IMO. That track was badass!!! Quote Last Post Only The racing was exciting, and a lot funner to watch IMO. That track was badass!!! "I always tell the truth.... even when I lie"
Devil1nNj Posts: 674 Joined: 11/12/2006 Location: Hewitt, NJ	10/25/2009 9:36 AM Devil1nNj wrote: Cool to see our roots. The fact that they could get those bikes to go that fast is impressive. So funny though, they look like novice riders for sure, as mentioned above. Another thing that is funny is if you watch Adam C on an 80 he looks like he would smoke these guys and prob lap em! haha It's really cool to see the progression of our sport. 2 things. In the intro they introduced 11 on a Kawi , but, it had red plastics. Was that just an error, or were dif plastics used due to lack of support from kawi? And did people bash Holley for waving to the crowd on the opening lap, then falling to 3rd so quickly, like so many would today? LOL Devil1nNj wrote: Cool to see our roots. The fact that they could get those bikes to go that fast is impressive. So funny though, they look like novice riders for sure, as mentioned above. Another thing that is funny is if you watch Adam C on an 80 he looks like he would smoke these guys and prob lap em! haha It's really cool to see the progression of our sport. 2 things. In the intro they introduced 11 on a Kawi , but, it had red plastics. Was that just an error, or were dif plastics used due to lack of support from kawi? And did people bash Holley for waving to the crowd on the opening lap, then falling to 3rd so quickly, like so many would today? LOL Quote Last Post Only Cool to see our roots. The fact that they could get those bikes to go that fast is impressive. So funny though, they look like novice riders for sure, as mentioned above. Another thing that is funny is if you watch Adam C on an 80 he looks like he would smoke these guys and prob lap em! haha It's really cool to see the progression of our sport. 2 things. In the intro they introduced 11 on a Kawi , but, it had red plastics. Was that just an error, or were dif plastics used due to lack of support from kawi? And did people bash Holley for waving to the crowd on the opening lap, then falling to 3rd so quickly, like so many would today? LOL Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people -Eleanor Roosevelt Aim: Devil1nnj
statefeed&grain Posts: 54 Joined: 8/01/2009 Location: ,	10/25/2009 9:40 AM statefeed&grain wrote: Tracks were better for spectating/viewing during that era for sure. statefeed&grain wrote: Tracks were better for spectating/viewing during that era for sure. Quote Last Post Only Tracks were better for spectating/viewing during that era for sure.
CRF STUFF Posts: 39 Joined: 3/20/2009 Location: ESTACADA, OR	10/25/2009 11:10 AM CRF STUFF wrote: He's on Kehoe like a Krishna on an airport traveler!!! CRF STUFF wrote: He's on Kehoe like a Krishna on an airport traveler!!! Quote Last Post Only He's on Kehoe like a Krishna on an airport traveler!!! CRFSTUFF.COM Trick Parts for the Greatest Dirt Bikes on Earth!
MX-LIFE. Posts: 71 Joined: 9/30/2009 Location: REDFORD, MI	10/25/2009 11:31 AM statefeed&grain wrote: Tracks were better for spectating/viewing during that era for sure. statefeed&grain wrote: Tracks were better for spectating/viewing during that era for sure. MX-LIFE. wrote: For the hell of it some one should get the blueprints out for that track and use them for A1 2010" that looked like a fun track and fast! Quote Last Post Only MX-LIFE. wrote: For the hell of it some one should get the blueprints out for that track and use them for A1 2010" that looked like a fun track and fast! Quote Last Post Only For the hell of it some one should get the blueprints out for that track and use them for A1 2010" that looked like a fun track and fast!
BAD10 Posts: 63 Joined: 1/03/2009 Location: SAN DIEGO, CA	10/25/2009 11:39 AM Devil1nNj wrote: Cool to see our roots. The fact that they could get those bikes to go that fast is impressive. So funny though, they look like novice riders for sure, as mentioned above. Another thing that is funny is if you watch Adam C on an 80 he looks like he would smoke these guys and prob lap em! haha It's really cool to see the progression of our sport. 2 things. In the intro they introduced 11 on a Kawi , but, it had red plastics. Was that just an error, or were dif plastics used due to lack of support from kawi? And did people bash Holley for waving to the crowd on the opening lap, then falling to 3rd so quickly, like so many would today? LOL Devil1nNj wrote: Cool to see our roots. The fact that they could get those bikes to go that fast is impressive. So funny though, they look like novice riders for sure, as mentioned above. Another thing that is funny is if you watch Adam C on an 80 he looks like he would smoke these guys and prob lap em! haha It's really cool to see the progression of our sport. 2 things. In the intro they introduced 11 on a Kawi , but, it had red plastics. Was that just an error, or were dif plastics used due to lack of support from kawi? And did people bash Holley for waving to the crowd on the opening lap, then falling to 3rd so quickly, like so many would today? LOL BAD10 wrote: Thats Keith Bowen #11. He rode for TUF racing that year and they ran orange plastic and seat covers on their Kawi's Quote Last Post Only BAD10 wrote: Thats Keith Bowen #11. He rode for TUF racing that year and they ran orange plastic and seat covers on their Kawi's Quote Last Post Only Thats Keith Bowen #11. He rode for TUF racing that year and they ran orange plastic and seat covers on their Kawi's www.speedzonepaint.com
Blackopsrider7 Posts: 441 Joined: 4/05/2008 Location: , SWZ	10/25/2009 12:18 PM Edited Date/Time: 10/25/2009 12:19 PM Blackopsrider7 wrote: There is a video there of Ron Lechien winning San Diego at 16 years old on a bone stock Yamie, he was flying!! Ricky Johnston was a mad man too!! Thanks for posting, down memory lane!! Blackopsrider7 wrote: There is a video there of Ron Lechien winning San Diego at 16 years old on a bone stock Yamie, he was flying!! Ricky Johnston was a mad man too!! Thanks for posting, down memory lane!! Quote Last Post Only There is a video there of Ron Lechien winning San Diego at 16 years old on a bone stock Yamie, he was flying!! Ricky Johnston was a mad man too!! Thanks for posting, down memory lane!!
Camp332 Posts: 2266 Joined: 8/16/2006 Location: Zoo Jersey, Zoo Jersey	10/25/2009 2:04 PM Camp332 wrote: Comparing them to today's novice class isn't cool. Those dudes were hanging it out, and I thought Kehoe looked smooth. No doubt that the suspension was crapola! Camp332 wrote: Comparing them to today's novice class isn't cool. Those dudes were hanging it out, and I thought Kehoe looked smooth. No doubt that the suspension was crapola! Quote Last Post Only Comparing them to today's novice class isn't cool. Those dudes were hanging it out, and I thought Kehoe looked smooth. No doubt that the suspension was crapola!
calimxer91 Posts: 2612 Joined: 4/01/2008 Location: WGAF,	10/25/2009 2:34 PM calimxer91 wrote: If someone made some "retro vids " prob make a lot of dough.Hardly ever saw Holley do that stuff. calimxer91 wrote: If someone made some "retro vids " prob make a lot of dough.Hardly ever saw Holley do that stuff. Quote Last Post Only If someone made some "retro vids " prob make a lot of dough.Hardly ever saw Holley do that stuff.
KX452 Posts: 26 Joined: 7/06/2009 Location: MILFORD, NJ	10/25/2009 3:33 PM KX452 wrote: awesome track. They should put todays riders on 1988 model bikes and send them out for retro night this year and see how many of them end up in the hospital trying to use their modern scrubing everything techniques. KX452 wrote: awesome track. They should put todays riders on 1988 model bikes and send them out for retro night this year and see how many of them end up in the hospital trying to use their modern scrubing everything techniques. Quote Last Post Only awesome track. They should put todays riders on 1988 model bikes and send them out for retro night this year and see how many of them end up in the hospital trying to use their modern scrubing everything techniques.
ocscottie Posts: 2775 Joined: 8/16/2006 Location: Redding, CA Moderator	10/25/2009 4:30 PM calimxer91 wrote: If someone made some "retro vids " prob make a lot of dough.Hardly ever saw Holley do that stuff. calimxer91 wrote: If someone made some "retro vids " prob make a lot of dough.Hardly ever saw Holley do that stuff. ocscottie wrote: I thought every real moto fan already had this: http://www.bestbuy.com/...duct&cp=1&id=1505121 Quote Last Post Only ocscottie wrote: I thought every real moto fan already had this: http://www.bestbuy.com/...duct&cp=1&id=1505121 Quote Last Post Only I thought every real moto fan already had this: http://www.bestbuy.com/...duct&cp=1&id=1505121 -OC www.dmxsradio.com
jib-tmb Posts: 479 Joined: 8/08/2008 Location: Meadville, PA	10/25/2009 4:42 PM jib-tmb wrote: Great video. I love watching those old races! jib-tmb wrote: Great video. I love watching those old races! Quote Last Post Only Great video. I love watching those old races!
Blackopsrider7 Posts: 441 Joined: 4/05/2008 Location: , SWZ	10/25/2009 4:52 PM Edited Date/Time: 10/25/2009 4:58 PM Blackopsrider7 wrote: Hehehe....on the suspension, oh yeah, leaps and bounds better these days!! I had an 86 CR250, great smooth power, but scary to hang onto!! Honestly a stock bike today is a lot better, but I can't obviously compare to the factory bikes of yesterday! On the riders looking like novices...well they don't quite look as fancy and fluid as today, but the skill set for being pro still existed, put them on today's bikes and I'm sure they will ride pretty good. That being said, the sport has evolved tons, Novices are a lot faster, intermediates are a lot faster and so are the pros!! I will speak of a topic I now lots about, put a 2nd war P-51 pilot in an F-15, they will be slightly overwhelmed by the complexity of the modern fighter, but that aside, the dog fighting techniques are the same, if anything, the modern fighter helps with automated systems! Blackopsrider7 wrote: Hehehe....on the suspension, oh yeah, leaps and bounds better these days!! I had an 86 CR250, great smooth power, but scary to hang onto!! Honestly a stock bike today is a lot better, but I can't obviously compare to the factory bikes of yesterday! On the riders looking like novices...well they don't quite look as fancy and fluid as today, but the skill set for being pro still existed, put them on today's bikes and I'm sure they will ride pretty good. That being said, the sport has evolved tons, Novices are a lot faster, intermediates are a lot faster and so are the pros!! I will speak of a topic I now lots about, put a 2nd war P-51 pilot in an F-15, they will be slightly overwhelmed by the complexity of the modern fighter, but that aside, the dog fighting techniques are the same, if anything, the modern fighter helps with automated systems! Quote Last Post Only Hehehe....on the suspension, oh yeah, leaps and bounds better these days!! I had an 86 CR250, great smooth power, but scary to hang onto!! Honestly a stock bike today is a lot better, but I can't obviously compare to the factory bikes of yesterday! On the riders looking like novices...well they don't quite look as fancy and fluid as today, but the skill set for being pro still existed, put them on today's bikes and I'm sure they will ride pretty good. That being said, the sport has evolved tons, Novices are a lot faster, intermediates are a lot faster and so are the pros!! I will speak of a topic I now lots about, put a 2nd war P-51 pilot in an F-15, they will be slightly overwhelmed by the complexity of the modern fighter, but that aside, the dog fighting techniques are the same, if anything, the modern fighter helps with automated systems!
queen of spodes Posts: 499 Joined: 11/25/2007 Location: Atlanta, GA	10/25/2009 5:24 PM Devil1nNj wrote: Cool to see our roots. The fact that they could get those bikes to go that fast is impressive. So funny though, they look like novice riders for sure, as mentioned above. Another thing that is funny is if you watch Adam C on an 80 he looks like he would smoke these guys and prob lap em! haha It's really cool to see the progression of our sport. 2 things. In the intro they introduced 11 on a Kawi , but, it had red plastics. Was that just an error, or were dif plastics used due to lack of support from kawi? And did people bash Holley for waving to the crowd on the opening lap, then falling to 3rd so quickly, like so many would today? LOL Devil1nNj wrote: Cool to see our roots. The fact that they could get those bikes to go that fast is impressive. So funny though, they look like novice riders for sure, as mentioned above. Another thing that is funny is if you watch Adam C on an 80 he looks like he would smoke these guys and prob lap em! haha It's really cool to see the progression of our sport. 2 things. In the intro they introduced 11 on a Kawi , but, it had red plastics. Was that just an error, or were dif plastics used due to lack of support from kawi? And did people bash Holley for waving to the crowd on the opening lap, then falling to 3rd so quickly, like so many would today? LOL queen of spodes wrote: Tuf Racing sold florescent colored plastic for Kawasakis. I guess they had it for other brands too but I remember seeing flo-orange kx's on the track back then. I still have unopened pink plastic for a 90-91 KX125/250. Quote Last Post Only queen of spodes wrote: Tuf Racing sold florescent colored plastic for Kawasakis. I guess they had it for other brands too but I remember seeing flo-orange kx's on the track back then. I still have unopened pink plastic for a 90-91 KX125/250. Quote Last Post Only Tuf Racing sold florescent colored plastic for Kawasakis. I guess they had it for other brands too but I remember seeing flo-orange kx's on the track back then. I still have unopened pink plastic for a 90-91 KX125/250.
JOHN CHOATE Posts: 565 Joined: 9/18/2008 Location: DALLAS, NC	10/25/2009 6:12 PM JOHN CHOATE wrote: Yeah, I also thought they looked like C class riders compared to today. Suspension looked really soft too. JOHN CHOATE wrote: Yeah, I also thought they looked like C class riders compared to today. Suspension looked really soft too. Quote Last Post Only Yeah, I also thought they looked like C class riders compared to today. Suspension looked really soft too.
roosty Posts: 2987 Joined: 5/17/2008 Location: BEND, OR	10/25/2009 8:37 PM calimxer91 wrote: If someone made some "retro vids " prob make a lot of dough.Hardly ever saw Holley do that stuff. ocscottie wrote: I thought every real moto fan already had this: http://www.bestbuy.com/...duct&cp=1&id=1505121 calimxer91 wrote: If someone made some "retro vids " prob make a lot of dough.Hardly ever saw Holley do that stuff. ocscottie wrote: I thought every real moto fan already had this: http://www.bestbuy.com/...duct&cp=1&id=1505121 roosty wrote: I just ordered that video. Thanks scottie! Although I got my copy for $8.47 including shipping. Quote Last Post Only roosty wrote: I just ordered that video. Thanks scottie! Although I got my copy for $8.47 including shipping. Quote Last Post Only I just ordered that video. Thanks scottie! Although I got my copy for $8.47 including shipping. "I always tell the truth.... even when I lie"
ocscottie Posts: 2775 Joined: 8/16/2006 Location: Redding, CA Moderator	10/25/2009 8:52 PM ocscottie wrote: Right on, and ya Amazon has them for real cheap, that was just the 1st link i found. ocscottie wrote: Right on, and ya Amazon has them for real cheap, that was just the 1st link i found. Quote Last Post Only Right on, and ya Amazon has them for real cheap, that was just the 1st link i found. -OC www.dmxsradio.com
jdub347 Posts: 215 Joined: 3/31/2008 Location: TUCSON, AZ	10/25/2009 9:28 PM jdub347 wrote: Some guy has the DVDs on e-bay for $3.99.... http://cgi.ebay.com/...?hash=item518da14ee0 jdub347 wrote: Some guy has the DVDs on e-bay for $3.99.... http://cgi.ebay.com/...?hash=item518da14ee0 Quote Last Post Only Some guy has the DVDs on e-bay for $3.99.... http://cgi.ebay.com/...?hash=item518da14ee0
jmc2 Posts: 380 Joined: 8/15/2006 Location: Gilbert, AZ	10/25/2009 9:55 PM jmc2 wrote: Thanks, just bought myself one as well.... jmc2 wrote: Thanks, just bought myself one as well.... Quote Last Post Only Thanks, just bought myself one as well....
JustMX Posts: 480 Joined: 4/01/2008 Location: ,	10/25/2009 10:00 PM JustMX wrote: If you watch the one from San Diego you realize how smooth Lechien, Glover, and Bailey were, how hard Ward always tried (and he even manhandled his own bike off the track after he broke) and how wild Johnson was. Tracks sucked. That one straight where they absolutely hammered into the face of a huge hill was just unreal. It would be awesome to see those 5 riders on today's tracks and on 450s, but..... Bailey and Glover going at it on 500's in the outdoors was probably the closest thing to that. JustMX wrote: If you watch the one from San Diego you realize how smooth Lechien, Glover, and Bailey were, how hard Ward always tried (and he even manhandled his own bike off the track after he broke) and how wild Johnson was. Tracks sucked. That one straight where they absolutely hammered into the face of a huge hill was just unreal. It would be awesome to see those 5 riders on today's tracks and on 450s, but..... Bailey and Glover going at it on 500's in the outdoors was probably the closest thing to that. Quote Last Post Only If you watch the one from San Diego you realize how smooth Lechien, Glover, and Bailey were, how hard Ward always tried (and he even manhandled his own bike off the track after he broke) and how wild Johnson was. Tracks sucked. That one straight where they absolutely hammered into the face of a huge hill was just unreal. It would be awesome to see those 5 riders on today's tracks and on 450s, but..... Bailey and Glover going at it on 500's in the outdoors was probably the closest thing to that.
englishman Posts: 911 Joined: 3/07/2008 Location: England, GBR	10/25/2009 10:13 PM englishman wrote: I remember racing back then and being as in awe of those guys as I am now of the current bunch. englishman wrote: I remember racing back then and being as in awe of those guys as I am now of the current bunch. Quote Last Post Only I remember racing back then and being as in awe of those guys as I am now of the current bunch.
Hank_Thrill Posts: 278 Joined: 9/22/2008 Location: Arlen, TX	10/26/2009 3:16 AM Hank_Thrill wrote: Dude, no responses to my theories? Hank_Thrill wrote: Dude, no responses to my theories? Quote Last Post Only Dude, no responses to my theories? ~H.Thrill

« Previous 1 2 Next »

Post a Reply to: Classic SX Video (must see)