something that needs to change.

rmpilot
Posts
776
Joined
4/8/2010
Location
Tomah, WI US
Edited Date/Time 8/26/2012 7:24am
People need to quit refering to the 450's as the premier class. this bugs the hell out of me that the 250 class is not held in the same regard by some. a national championship is a national championship. and the "world" championship mx2 class with its age rule. just the other the day someone on here took a crack at tedesco for riding the 250 class this year. is lamson a lesser rider because he was a decent 500 class rider then ended up winning 2 125 national championships or or the same with mickey dymond?
|
8/25/2012 11:22am
Face it, the 250 class is not held in the same regard because the top riders move up to the top class, which is the 450's currently.

No different than in roadracing, where the riders racing 600's aspire to ride the 1000 superbikes, or in car racing where the F2000 guys want to race F1.

Every form of motorsports either has or needs a feeder class. In the US it's the 250 class.

As for your question about Lamson and Mickey Dymond, Although they were very fast, they weren't able to win in the premier class of their day, because there were other riders that were faster than them. Accept it.
rc4187
Posts
1076
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
WA US
8/25/2012 11:28am
Would the racing be any different if we called it something else?
steve_97060
Posts
1396
Joined
10/4/2009
Location
Florence, AZ US
8/25/2012 11:39am
I agree, the whole feeder class BS started with SX. I think a lot of the younger guys now associate the 250 as a lesser class as a result

I started in the good old days when there was always classes, 125, 250, and Open, and they were all prestigious.
BobbyM
Posts
21449
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
8/25/2012 11:41am
rmpilot wrote:
People need to quit refering to the 450's as the premier class. this bugs the hell out of me that the 250 class is not held...
People need to quit refering to the 450's as the premier class. this bugs the hell out of me that the 250 class is not held in the same regard by some. a national championship is a national championship. and the "world" championship mx2 class with its age rule. just the other the day someone on here took a crack at tedesco for riding the 250 class this year. is lamson a lesser rider because he was a decent 500 class rider then ended up winning 2 125 national championships or or the same with mickey dymond?
Bummer it bothers you but the fact is it's the mans class. it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over a 250 around an mx course, and to compare yesteryear with now isn't quite the same. what does a 125 title have to do with a better or lesser rider..especially back then?

and premier is in itself "exclusive" by definition....

The Shop

rmpilot
Posts
776
Joined
4/8/2010
Location
Tomah, WI US
8/25/2012 11:52am
rmpilot wrote:
People need to quit refering to the 450's as the premier class. this bugs the hell out of me that the 250 class is not held...
People need to quit refering to the 450's as the premier class. this bugs the hell out of me that the 250 class is not held in the same regard by some. a national championship is a national championship. and the "world" championship mx2 class with its age rule. just the other the day someone on here took a crack at tedesco for riding the 250 class this year. is lamson a lesser rider because he was a decent 500 class rider then ended up winning 2 125 national championships or or the same with mickey dymond?
BobbyM wrote:
Bummer it bothers you but the fact is it's the mans class. it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over...
Bummer it bothers you but the fact is it's the mans class. it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over a 250 around an mx course, and to compare yesteryear with now isn't quite the same. what does a 125 title have to do with a better or lesser rider..especially back then?

and premier is in itself "exclusive" by definition....
1. should it not be refered to as a national championship then?

2. how is their earning of 125 titles not relevant? i was making the comparison of tedesco to their results in the equivalent class of today that has replaced the 125 class.
TerryB
Posts
2761
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Cambridge, MN US
8/25/2012 11:53am
I agree, the whole feeder class BS started with SX. I think a lot of the younger guys now associate the 250 as a lesser class...
I agree, the whole feeder class BS started with SX. I think a lot of the younger guys now associate the 250 as a lesser class as a result

I started in the good old days when there was always classes, 125, 250, and Open, and they were all prestigious.
Agreed.

Also, it isn't proof that the larger displacement class is the "premier" class if a small bore specialist doesn't succeed there. There have been many times, past and present, that the small bore pilots were clearly faster than the "prestige" guys. Sometimes, a particular riding style suits one bike over the other.

I think any of our recent 450 champs would have their hands full in the current "feeder" class, and it wouldn't be because they are too heavy for the bike to be competitive.
bradmx421
Posts
1617
Joined
1/9/2010
Location
Riverside, CA US
8/25/2012 11:55am
Wasnt this same topic going on last week?

there will always be an entry level and a premier class in Motocross/Supercross.....you cant change what the Moto Gods have set in stone for us
FreshTopEnd
Posts
12476
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA US
Fantasy
4254th
8/25/2012 11:56am
I agree that the two should be looked at the same, but this is on my list of things not worth losing sleep over.
jamma10
Posts
10576
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol GB
8/25/2012 11:59am Edited Date/Time 8/25/2012 12:05pm
rmpilot wrote:
People need to quit refering to the 450's as the premier class. this bugs the hell out of me that the 250 class is not held...
People need to quit refering to the 450's as the premier class. this bugs the hell out of me that the 250 class is not held in the same regard by some. a national championship is a national championship. and the "world" championship mx2 class with its age rule. just the other the day someone on here took a crack at tedesco for riding the 250 class this year. is lamson a lesser rider because he was a decent 500 class rider then ended up winning 2 125 national championships or or the same with mickey dymond?
BobbyM wrote:
Bummer it bothers you but the fact is it's the mans class. it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over...
Bummer it bothers you but the fact is it's the mans class. it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over a 250 around an mx course, and to compare yesteryear with now isn't quite the same. what does a 125 title have to do with a better or lesser rider..especially back then?

and premier is in itself "exclusive" by definition....
'it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over a 250 around an mx course'

I dont really buy that. You only have to look at the amount of times a Lites rider has stepped up to ride a 450 for a one off race and has absolutely killed it - the AMA, MXdN etc. Yes they are ridden slightly differently, but the kids are so talented these days that they adapt in the blink of an eye and 9/10 they say they prefer riding the bigger bike!

And as for 'the top riders move up to the top class' comment above, yes they do, but so do the 20 or so other mediocre (in comparison) riders. Whats more, the guys who have been getting their asses beat by the likes of Dungey, Villopoto their whole career appear to lose motivation and just plateau, they don't have the hunger of a Baggett or a Barcia, or any other rider who is used to battling for podiums. At the very least the top 4-5 Lites riders in America could beat the majority of the 450 class.
rmpilot
Posts
776
Joined
4/8/2010
Location
Tomah, WI US
8/25/2012 12:02pm
Face it, the 250 class is not held in the same regard because the top riders move up to the top class, which is the 450's...
Face it, the 250 class is not held in the same regard because the top riders move up to the top class, which is the 450's currently.

No different than in roadracing, where the riders racing 600's aspire to ride the 1000 superbikes, or in car racing where the F2000 guys want to race F1.

Every form of motorsports either has or needs a feeder class. In the US it's the 250 class.

As for your question about Lamson and Mickey Dymond, Although they were very fast, they weren't able to win in the premier class of their day, because there were other riders that were faster than them. Accept it.
lamson peak of career



1993

250MX

3


1993

500MX

4

154


1993

250SX

5

230


1994

250SX

5


His final position in the points. obviously in the mix.
rmpilot
Posts
776
Joined
4/8/2010
Location
Tomah, WI US
8/25/2012 12:09pm Edited Date/Time 8/25/2012 12:19pm
dymond on the other hand was a flash in the pan and i will stand corrected.
GrapeApe
Posts
6993
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
Fantasy
551st
8/25/2012 12:17pm
TerryB wrote:
Agreed. Also, it isn't proof that the larger displacement class is the "premier" class if a small bore specialist doesn't succeed there. There have been many...
Agreed.

Also, it isn't proof that the larger displacement class is the "premier" class if a small bore specialist doesn't succeed there. There have been many times, past and present, that the small bore pilots were clearly faster than the "prestige" guys. Sometimes, a particular riding style suits one bike over the other.

I think any of our recent 450 champs would have their hands full in the current "feeder" class, and it wouldn't be because they are too heavy for the bike to be competitive.
I think any of our recent 450 champs would have their hands full in the current "feeder" class, and it wouldn't be because they are too heavy for the bike to be competitive.

You obviously slept through the "lites" careers of Villopoto, Stewart, Dungey and Reed.

Oh, and, what FTE said.
DonM
Posts
6760
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
8/25/2012 2:12pm
How about there is a reason the top 450 guys are paid more than the top 250 guys.....that's why it's the premier class.
BobbyM
Posts
21449
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
8/25/2012 2:25pm
rmpilot wrote:
People need to quit refering to the 450's as the premier class. this bugs the hell out of me that the 250 class is not held...
People need to quit refering to the 450's as the premier class. this bugs the hell out of me that the 250 class is not held in the same regard by some. a national championship is a national championship. and the "world" championship mx2 class with its age rule. just the other the day someone on here took a crack at tedesco for riding the 250 class this year. is lamson a lesser rider because he was a decent 500 class rider then ended up winning 2 125 national championships or or the same with mickey dymond?
BobbyM wrote:
Bummer it bothers you but the fact is it's the mans class. it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over...
Bummer it bothers you but the fact is it's the mans class. it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over a 250 around an mx course, and to compare yesteryear with now isn't quite the same. what does a 125 title have to do with a better or lesser rider..especially back then?

and premier is in itself "exclusive" by definition....
rmpilot wrote:
1. should it not be refered to as a national championship then? 2. how is their earning of 125 titles not relevant? i was making the...
1. should it not be refered to as a national championship then?

2. how is their earning of 125 titles not relevant? i was making the comparison of tedesco to their results in the equivalent class of today that has replaced the 125 class.
because lamsons titles were as prestigious as the others but as you pointed out the 250F class is 2nd fiddle today. Tedesco "dropping" down isn't quite the same thing.
BobbyM
Posts
21449
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
8/25/2012 2:27pm
jamma10 wrote:
'it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over a 250 around an mx course' I dont really buy that. You...
'it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over a 250 around an mx course'

I dont really buy that. You only have to look at the amount of times a Lites rider has stepped up to ride a 450 for a one off race and has absolutely killed it - the AMA, MXdN etc. Yes they are ridden slightly differently, but the kids are so talented these days that they adapt in the blink of an eye and 9/10 they say they prefer riding the bigger bike!

And as for 'the top riders move up to the top class' comment above, yes they do, but so do the 20 or so other mediocre (in comparison) riders. Whats more, the guys who have been getting their asses beat by the likes of Dungey, Villopoto their whole career appear to lose motivation and just plateau, they don't have the hunger of a Baggett or a Barcia, or any other rider who is used to battling for podiums. At the very least the top 4-5 Lites riders in America could beat the majority of the 450 class.
I left out balls and courage...sorry
Xeno
Posts
3635
Joined
12/30/2010
Location
San Clemente, CA US
8/25/2012 2:29pm
When 250s outsell 450s then 250 will be the premier class.
FastEddy
Posts
13364
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
., FL US
Fantasy
944th
8/25/2012 2:51pm Edited Date/Time 8/25/2012 2:58pm
Things have definitely changed these days to a certain degree.
The 125 Class was split into East & West regions in supercross because it was considered a "Privateer Class".
The 125 Outdoors was always considered a stepping stone class for the young guns to get their feet wet and for privateers.
(It still is in a sense but the teams & riders have advanced since back in the day and then when you take into consideration Lites bike specialists, the class has really grown indoors & out).The expenses of racing Lites I believe outdoors in probably harder on a privateer then the 450 class financially.
I do feel it has evolved into being on the same level as the so-called premier class to a certain extent.
But then again...what separates the men from the boys? Smile
Experience racing at that level, maybe?
TerryB
Posts
2761
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Cambridge, MN US
8/25/2012 3:38pm
GrapeApe wrote:
[i]I think any of our recent 450 champs would have their hands full in the current "feeder" class, and it wouldn't be because they are too...
I think any of our recent 450 champs would have their hands full in the current "feeder" class, and it wouldn't be because they are too heavy for the bike to be competitive.

You obviously slept through the "lites" careers of Villopoto, Stewart, Dungey and Reed.

Oh, and, what FTE said.
Quite awake actually. What does that have to do with how they would fare on 250's against the current crop of Tomac, Bagget, Barcia, etc? I say it would be no cake walk, they would have a battle on their hands, and the current young guns would be taking their share of wins.

You must have slept through reaading comprehension 101.
TDeath21
Posts
6523
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO US
8/25/2012 6:47pm
The 450 class is the premier class. Not because it has better racing, but it's where the best riders go. That's where the big money is. When a rider turns pro, what class does he go to and stay for at least three years 99% of the time? The 250 class. It's where the younger riders race at.

Every sport has to have a way to get all the top guys on the same field/court/race track/motocross track at the same time. Imagine never seeing a Stewart vs Carmichael battle. Imagine a rider that's amazing on a 125/250 and cleaning up the class against teenagers for his entire career.

At the top level of any sport, you can't have two separate classes where the top guys can avoid each other. When you do, like boxing does, it leads to people avoiding each other to get a better chance at a win. Look at the Manny Pacquiao Floyd Mayweather situation.

The best riders will be the best on any size motorcycle they ride. It might take them a couple years to adjust to the 450 (Carmichael and Villopoto for example), but they will always be the best. Riders not doing as well on a 450 have to do with stiffer competition, not the motorcycle. A 450 takes a lot more strength and fitness to ride, and once that part is figured out, you'll see that the top guys will rise to the occasion.
MX4EVR
Posts
836
Joined
7/27/2010
Location
Canton, OH US
8/25/2012 9:09pm
125/250f class = kiddie class
Lammy was a Sandbagger for dropping back down with his chrome shoulder pads back then! Lmao!
8/25/2012 9:27pm
GrapeApe wrote:
[i]I think any of our recent 450 champs would have their hands full in the current "feeder" class, and it wouldn't be because they are too...
I think any of our recent 450 champs would have their hands full in the current "feeder" class, and it wouldn't be because they are too heavy for the bike to be competitive.

You obviously slept through the "lites" careers of Villopoto, Stewart, Dungey and Reed.

Oh, and, what FTE said.
TerryB wrote:
Quite awake actually. What does that have to do with how they would fare on 250's against the current crop of Tomac, Bagget, Barcia, etc? I...
Quite awake actually. What does that have to do with how they would fare on 250's against the current crop of Tomac, Bagget, Barcia, etc? I say it would be no cake walk, they would have a battle on their hands, and the current young guns would be taking their share of wins.

You must have slept through reaading comprehension 101.
He did have ya covered on that one Terry....gotta give it to him....Villo n Dungey schooled then against Townley n company....why wouldn't they do the same now? Were Hepler and those guys not the same?
BobbyM
Posts
21449
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
8/25/2012 11:12pm
FastEddy wrote:
Things have definitely changed these days to a certain degree. The 125 Class was split into East & West regions in supercross because it was considered...
Things have definitely changed these days to a certain degree.
The 125 Class was split into East & West regions in supercross because it was considered a "Privateer Class".
The 125 Outdoors was always considered a stepping stone class for the young guns to get their feet wet and for privateers.
(It still is in a sense but the teams & riders have advanced since back in the day and then when you take into consideration Lites bike specialists, the class has really grown indoors & out).The expenses of racing Lites I believe outdoors in probably harder on a privateer then the 450 class financially.
I do feel it has evolved into being on the same level as the so-called premier class to a certain extent.
But then again...what separates the men from the boys? Smile
Experience racing at that level, maybe?
I beg to differ on the125 class back in the day.hannah and smith and others raced all three and the manus
sold more 125's more than anything else so it was very important imho.
DrSweden
Posts
6767
Joined
8/30/2008
Location
Stockholm SE
8/26/2012 7:03am
jamma10 wrote:
'it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over a 250 around an mx course' I dont really buy that. You...
'it takes quite a bit more skill and brains to commandeer a 450 over a 250 around an mx course'

I dont really buy that. You only have to look at the amount of times a Lites rider has stepped up to ride a 450 for a one off race and has absolutely killed it - the AMA, MXdN etc. Yes they are ridden slightly differently, but the kids are so talented these days that they adapt in the blink of an eye and 9/10 they say they prefer riding the bigger bike!

And as for 'the top riders move up to the top class' comment above, yes they do, but so do the 20 or so other mediocre (in comparison) riders. Whats more, the guys who have been getting their asses beat by the likes of Dungey, Villopoto their whole career appear to lose motivation and just plateau, they don't have the hunger of a Baggett or a Barcia, or any other rider who is used to battling for podiums. At the very least the top 4-5 Lites riders in America could beat the majority of the 450 class.
well-reasoned.
rmpilot
Posts
776
Joined
4/8/2010
Location
Tomah, WI US
8/26/2012 7:23am
BobbyM wrote:
I beg to differ on the125 class back in the day.hannah and smith and others raced all three and the manus sold more 125's more than...
I beg to differ on the125 class back in the day.hannah and smith and others raced all three and the manus
sold more 125's more than anything else so it was very important imho.
maybe ive let my remembering of the old days and all the research ive done cloud my judgement. i guess to me a national championship is a national championship and we are not talking about lorreta lynns crap. but are you implying that more 450's are sold than 250f's?
rmpilot
Posts
776
Joined
4/8/2010
Location
Tomah, WI US
8/26/2012 7:24am
MX4EVR wrote:
125/250f class = kiddie class
Lammy was a Sandbagger for dropping back down with his chrome shoulder pads back then! Lmao!
sandbagger? moron.

Post a reply to: something that needs to change.

The Latest