Posts
921
Joined
12/5/2014
Location
FIN
FI
I´m thinking of buying a 90´s cr250 steel frame of course. just for fun i think they look really cool. but i don´t know nothing about them so help me a little. which year was the best ? where there any big changes from year to year ? how was the bike overall ? i have heard some good things about them.
so just put you opinions about the sick looking bike.
so just put you opinions about the sick looking bike.
I'm thinking about buying it, i think it would be cool to have a vintage bike. Although a 89 bike would be older than me haha.
I want one as well
The Shop
I would probably rather have a 93 125 and put 95 plastic and a 19" rear wheel on it.
Can't go wrong with any 93'-96' CR
93 was basically a 92 frame with more gusseting. Stanton and Bayle had some flex problems in the swingarm pivot area early in 92 during Supercross, Some breakage as well.. There was a recall (or at least a T.S.B.) on the 92 swingarms, for cracking around the welds. so the frame and swingarm was beefed up in that area as well as around the steering head for the 1993 production bikes.
94 had slightly different steering geometry and a different clamp offset that relaxed the steering a bit and was suppose to increase stability.. I much preferred the 93 cornering but I did add a steering dampener to mine. 95 and 96 were alot like the 94 with suspension changes.
Forks were junk on all of them so a modern fork and shock on a 93 would be the best bike ever IMO. My friend built one and sold it without letting me know..
The motors in those bikes, 92-96 were the absolute best I've ever ridden.
Honestly, Any semi clean 92-96 would be an awesome bike to build. but if you want to narrow it down, my preference is 93.
Old&New's bike looks awesome but to get it to look like that, takes a lot of time, a lot of money & a lot of patience.
Pit Row
They complained about the suspension back in the day, but I don't think it is too bad. Pro Circuit still has, or at least they did a few years ago, the non-recirculating works kit available, so I had them install that and revalve it. It works great...nearly on par with he SSS stuff on my 06 YZ250.
If you still want to put newer 47mm twin chamber showa forks on, it's pretty easy and you can do it a couple different ways. The 95/96 clamps are 24mm offset like most Honda CR/CRF's before 2008. The top clamp is the correct bore, but the 96 lower clamp bore is a few thousandths to big and the 95 is a few thousandths too small. You can shim up the 96 clamp or bore the 95. Another way is to just use the clamps off the 2002+ aluminum framed CR/CRFs on the steel frame by welding an extension to the steering stop on the front of head tube to meet the stop, which on the CRF is meant to butt up agains the main frame rather than the tab on the head tube. The 92-94 head tube is smaller so you will have to press in a shorter stem or put spacers under the top clamp. All Balls sells bearing kits to mount the different clamps.
I use the rubber mounted top clamp off a 2002-2004 CR/CRF because it has the number plate mount on the front rather than the top.
If your a weight watcher, the 47mm Showa forks are just over a pound lighter than the open circulating 96 KYBs. YZ Titanium shock springs are 1.5 lbs lighter and fit the KYB 95-96 CR shocks. The stock spring rate is 5.5 kg/mm so if you find a YZ450 5.5 spring your good to go. The YZ Ti Pegs fit pretty well too. The 95/96 shock, which has the high/low speed compression adjuster, can also be used on the 92-94 CR250.
The 92-2001 Engine is pretty good. My 06 YZ250 puts it to shame with a much wider power spread but my 96 gets it done with a nice midrange hit that starts just low enough and pulls pretty far. It's a good engine, especially for it's time.
Its ok to make fun of my butt whip, everyone else does!
https://get.google.com/albumarchive/100091857805186061651/album/AF1QipO…
Post a reply to: buying a 90´s Honda CR250