What do most pro run for tubes?

aeffertz
Posts
9324
Joined
7/16/2015
Location
Eau Claire, WI US
Edited Date/Time 11/27/2015 6:01pm
Heavy duty, mousse or tubeless?
|
Rich Piano
Posts
305
Joined
11/10/2015
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
11/26/2015 7:02pm Edited Date/Time 11/26/2015 7:02pm
In back mostly. Fatty tubes in front still?
ML512
Posts
15464
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
54th
11/26/2015 7:16pm
Rich Piano wrote:
In back mostly. Fatty tubes in front still?
I'm seeing more and more run Mousse front and rear in Outdoors. SX, some rear only, while some guys go back to tubes both ends.
Rich Piano
Posts
305
Joined
11/10/2015
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
11/27/2015 9:19am
ML512 wrote:
I'm seeing more and more run Mousse front and rear in Outdoors. SX, some rear only, while some guys go back to tubes both ends.
Interesting. Regular tubes or fatty tubes?
Are fatty tubes lighter than mousses still?

The Shop

11/27/2015 10:31am
Any pros running tubeless? Seems like a no brainer according to the data I've read on it. Or am I missing a factor that pros would introduce causing them to be inferior to a heavy tube?
ML512
Posts
15464
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
54th
11/27/2015 11:40am
Any pros running tubeless? Seems like a no brainer according to the data I've read on it. Or am I missing a factor that pros would...
Any pros running tubeless? Seems like a no brainer according to the data I've read on it. Or am I missing a factor that pros would introduce causing them to be inferior to a heavy tube?
No team that I'm aware of, and the system is pretty easy to spot.
aeffertz
Posts
9324
Joined
7/16/2015
Location
Eau Claire, WI US
11/27/2015 5:04pm Edited Date/Time 11/27/2015 5:06pm
Any pros running tubeless? Seems like a no brainer according to the data I've read on it. Or am I missing a factor that pros would...
Any pros running tubeless? Seems like a no brainer according to the data I've read on it. Or am I missing a factor that pros would introduce causing them to be inferior to a heavy tube?
ML512 wrote:
No team that I'm aware of, and the system is pretty easy to spot.
How exactly is it easier to spot a TUbliss setup? Everything mounts the same, doesn't it?

But anyway, I was having an argument with my brother because he swore most teams ran those TUbliss set ups but I was certain more teams run either a mousse setup or just regular tubes, depending on what the rider complains about.
Slosh 112
Posts
1155
Joined
3/31/2014
Location
Mackay QLD AU
11/27/2015 5:09pm
How come TUBliss never took off? seemed like it was going to be the next best thing...
FI2T
Posts
686
Joined
10/23/2012
Location
Kennewick, WA US
11/27/2015 5:16pm
I run tubliss and love it... I'm suprised more don't run them. Definitely saves weight and no flats!
rutsmash
Posts
526
Joined
3/1/2014
Location
Phoenix, AZ US
11/27/2015 6:01pm
Any pros running tubeless? Seems like a no brainer according to the data I've read on it. Or am I missing a factor that pros would...
Any pros running tubeless? Seems like a no brainer according to the data I've read on it. Or am I missing a factor that pros would introduce causing them to be inferior to a heavy tube?
ML512 wrote:
No team that I'm aware of, and the system is pretty easy to spot.
aeffertz wrote:
How exactly is it easier to spot a TUbliss setup? Everything mounts the same, doesn't it? But anyway, I was having an argument with my brother...
How exactly is it easier to spot a TUbliss setup? Everything mounts the same, doesn't it?

But anyway, I was having an argument with my brother because he swore most teams ran those TUbliss set ups but I was certain more teams run either a mousse setup or just regular tubes, depending on what the rider complains about.
There is two valve stems, one of which also serves as the rim lock which is distinctive in itself...(if I remember correctly).

Post a reply to: What do most pro run for tubes?

The Latest