Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
The Shop
I think that was the was the OP's implication. And it's not just sometimes with the novice class its a lot of the time.
WTF is a national C rider? Ridiculous. When you have a C rider running with a Pro,local or not, something is terribly wrong with the advancement system in this sport.
Here in NZ, we have local guys who are fast. They can go and race NZ nationals. The guys who do well in the nationals then have the option of going overseas.
When those guys go overseas, they seem to do quite well against pro riders from other countries. You might have heard of some of those riders, Townley, Cooper, Coppins, Columb. Would these fast local pro's beat a C rider from LL?
LL should move to NZ, it would be much simpler.
It sucks, but it's the truth.
And I am 100% on board with calling BS on a C rider national championship. It's dumb. It's ridiculous. It's money.
Pit Row
Many many moons ago, on a planet far far away, before MX Sports implemented some of its present C class rules, I know of, for a fact, riders who raced the "money class" (never called the "pro class") at certain track(s) but then raced C class at LL's, finishing top 5 and even getting a moto win.
It's hard for that to happen today with the interweb and all.
Do I think that some LL's C class winner, who lives in say Florida, Arizona, Texas or at MTF/GPF in Georgia where they can ride almost year around, can beat a local pro from some other area?
Yeah, I think we can find a local pro that can be easily beat by a LL's C class winner
BTW, a little LL's C Class trivia....only one rider has won a C class title at LL's and gone on to win another title, name the rider....
and he won a few titles after lol
The difference between C and especially the B and A classes at the larger amateur events has been blurred to the point I can't hardly tell who is who. I feel the contingency programs may be partially to blame.
I agree there are a few sandbaggers in the c class. The AMA is working on and improving advancement rules each year.
No rider who has ever won a C class title at LLs has ever won an A class title there and only two C class winners have ever won another title at all so apparantly they are not that damn good.
Greg Scnell,
not sure on the spelling, pretty sure he won an A class later?
The rules say you can't be moved up to A class until your 16 year old year so there are a lot of AMA 15 year olds (16) riding B class.
At LLs the top 10 in the 250 A class averaged laptimes from 2:01 to 2:08. The B class average was 2:02 to 2:11 so while the top B riders are on par with the a class once you get out of the top 5 the A class is about 3 seconds a lap faster.
The 250 C top 10 averaged 2:14 to about 2:20 which is quite a bit slower than the A or B class.
Post a reply to: Top Am C rider vs Local pro?