Posts
2338
Joined
1/9/2010
Location
Clifton, NJ
US
Edited Date/Time
8/16/2014 8:01pm
It's clear that there is a major incentive to have an IV between motos. It's not clear how to stop it.
Why not force riders to stay in view between moots? I know it's hot outside of their RVs but if everyone has to do it, it's the same for everyone. Maybe they have to take a leak at a common bathroom or a porta potty. This would make it much harder to sneak the IV.
Why not force riders to stay in view between moots? I know it's hot outside of their RVs but if everyone has to do it, it's the same for everyone. Maybe they have to take a leak at a common bathroom or a porta potty. This would make it much harder to sneak the IV.
The Shop
I guess noting should be done.
If you want everyone to have them (or access to them), I think that's a solution too. There could be practical problems about getting enough medical personnel around, particularly for the privateers.
Also, I didn't say anything about James. He might have accidentally brought the issue up but it's been discussed to death before this and riders like JT and others are on record saying they've seen it done. That's plenty of evidence to me, and it should be pretty obvious that this would be going on behind closed doors. Why wouldn't you under current conditions?
The solution should be that asterisk administers 1 500ml saline IV to every rider after the first moto.... I don't know what the harm would be other than ensuring the riders don't dehydrate.
I understand this correctly...if Doc Bodnar gives the IV he "might" not release you to race. If you provide your own "medical professional" they can legally release you to continue competition.? I am confused.
Pit Row
There is almost no room to argue that James was treating "medical emergencies" each weekend between the motos.
You've filled in the blanks when in fact you have zero evidence of what goes in the blank spaces.
The circumstantial evidence points towards cheating.
When you make up a bunch of benign reasons for why a nurse would explicitly state that she is there to give James IVs then you are the one making up hypothetical justifications.
Does it really make sense for James to hire a nurse to oversee his condition on race day? It's like hiring a receptionist at a gym to create your workouts instead of a trainer.
What I've done is provide possible reasons why Stewart could have a private nurse.
What you've done is fill in those blanks, which you are now calling "circumstantial evidence", accusing Stewart of cheating.
Post a reply to: The IV issue