Posts
159
Joined
3/30/2011
Location
CO
US
Heres my prediction...race length will go back to being determined by the number of laps completed. Why do I say this? Because tracks can't hold up to the additional traffic. Heck...they couldn't hold up before (e.g. Villopoto's 2010 crash in St. Louis) and if rider safety is of any level of concern, we'll go back to how it was.
If they keep the short tracks and a timed race then I'd just want more dirt so we're not seeing plywood each week. I like these rutted up tracks as it starts challenging the riders more. It's fun to watch.
The Shop
People fail to realize........
The real problem may be as simple as the harebrained decision to go to “Timed Practice”. It forces the riders to ride the fast line during practice, thus insuring a one-lined racetrack, and wearing that one line harder. They used to place hay bales on the insides, or in the good line during practice, to create more lines. Supercross and Motocross is about racing, not just who can do ONE FAST LAP.
I love that tracks are breaking down and JT$ said it right by referring anyone who thinks this is a new phenomenon to watch old supercross races from the 90s. If Feld perceives the track getting down to the plywood as a problem then I think they'll ask dirt works to make the base thicker and that means they'll be buying more dirt.
As far as rider safety being a concern...I knew someone would pick up on that and laugh. Unfortunately its probably true that they don't care, but its sad at the same time. There are enough risks without unsafe tracks factoring in.
I too like the longer races.....but they need to have well constructed tracks that will hold up for the duration. If you think otherwise, then your are just watching for the carnage.
Pit Row
Post a reply to: Race Length - next year