would add some extra incentive in the second moto and help make sense of the overall/ per moto possible discrepancies to the casual observer don't ya thinK?
Edited Date/Time:
"We are the architects of our own fate." Muhammad Yunus
Edited Date/Time:
They should just do the original way of mx points... lowest points win and 2nd moto breaks a tie, then give points accordingly:motomike137 wrote: There should be a small bonus for being on the overall podium... say 1st 3pts... 2nd 2pts... 3rd 1pt
would add some extra incentive in the second moto and help make sense of the overall/ per moto possible discrepancies to the casual observer don't ya thinK?
Edited Date/Time:
Did AMA Nats ever score the season on low score? I remember when they changed from awarding based on overall to per moto but I thought it was still a system where you got the highest number of points for a win.motomike137 wrote: There should be a small bonus for being on the overall podium... say 1st 3pts... 2nd 2pts... 3rd 1pt
would add some extra incentive in the second moto and help make sense of the overall/ per moto possible discrepancies to the casual observer don't ya thinK?Sondy132001 wrote: They should just do the original way of mx points... lowest points win and 2nd moto breaks a tie, then give points accordingly:
1st over all 41
2nd 38
3rd 36
4th 34
5rh 32
6th 31
7th 30 all the way to 40th, with 2 points being the smallest amount you can make.
S
PS also what he said ^^^^^^^ about GP points not the lowest amount.
actually jay, I have bounced some things over to Davey to show him a solution to three issues and one of them was the fact that a guy in 21st place, in the most competitive series (arguably) in the world, got absolutely nada in return. (the two others where purse to get the guys in 40th some bucks, and the main one was practice)500guy wrote: I think they should give points back to 40th too even if everyone from 20th - 30th got 2 points and 30th-40th got 1 point.
not sure your system would separate the leaders even more then they are now or make it closer.
I would be willing to let the AMA pay me to do a study on it.
A person is smart.... A group of people are only as smart as the loudest person in the room!
I like that idea.aFACEdismembered wrote: The least they could do is give someone a point or 5 for the holeshot.
A person is smart.... A group of people are only as smart as the loudest person in the room!
If you go back to 40th, you should widen the "Winners Gap" a bit to reward those that actually RUN UP-Front accordingly.motomike137 wrote: There should be a small bonus for being on the overall podium... say 1st 3pts... 2nd 2pts... 3rd 1pt
would add some extra incentive in the second moto and help make sense of the overall/ per moto possible discrepancies to the casual observer don't ya thinK?Sondy132001 wrote: They should just do the original way of mx points... lowest points win and 2nd moto breaks a tie, then give points accordingly:
1st over all 41
2nd 38
3rd 36
4th 34
5rh 32
6th 31
7th 30 all the way to 40th, with 2 points being the smallest amount you can make.
S
PS also what he said ^^^^^^^ about GP points not the lowest amount.
Matthes. He's SO Hot this year. Matthes.
I hear ya Manny, but if you really look at the numbers, end of the series numbers...20th-40th, do they really do all 12 Nationals ?? NO the top 10-20 are going to have premium amounts of points, do we have an example of the overall points from last year 450, I want to see how many guy were really "in it" for the points (championship)...Lot's of local dudes to the area, or say west coast guys racing west coast nationals and east coast guys to east coast nationals, not a huge motive to go hit another race with no points incentives.motomike137 wrote: There should be a small bonus for being on the overall podium... say 1st 3pts... 2nd 2pts... 3rd 1pt
would add some extra incentive in the second moto and help make sense of the overall/ per moto possible discrepancies to the casual observer don't ya thinK?Sondy132001 wrote: They should just do the original way of mx points... lowest points win and 2nd moto breaks a tie, then give points accordingly:
1st over all 41
2nd 38
3rd 36
4th 34
5rh 32
6th 31
7th 30 all the way to 40th, with 2 points being the smallest amount you can make.
S
PS also what he said ^^^^^^^ about GP points not the lowest amount.TeamGreen wrote: If you go back to 40th, you should widen the "Winners Gap" a bit to reward those that actually RUN UP-Front accordingly.
Prolly a 8 point gap to second, 3 point gap back to 5th, 2 point gap to tenth...etc.
This would more fairly reward the Top 10...which is someting we all seem to pay attention to & it would surely put a good premium on a win.
As for the Tie Breaking system: It works already.
1. 60
2. 52
3. 49
4. 46
5. 43
6. 40
7. 38
8. 36
9. 34
10. 32
11. 30
12. 29
13. 28
14. 27
15. 26
16. 25
17. 24
18. 23
19. 22
20. 21
21. 20
22. 19
23. 18
24. 17
25. 16
26. 15
27. 14
28. 13
29. 12
30. 11
31. 10
32. 9
33. 8
34. 7
35. 6
36. 5
37. 4
38. 3
39. 2
40. 1
in a past life, I was myself
when opportunity knocked, it waited because I was busy
I gave my father a talking to
The History & Tradition approach is a thin veil...CR250Rider wrote: Leave it alone.
It's not that horrible now, tradition and history are important !
Matthes. He's SO Hot this year. Matthes.
dont screw with me, i am old and feeling grumpy..