Posts
2901
Joined
4/17/2009
Location
High Desert, CA
US
Edited Date/Time
7/26/2015 3:53pm
As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship. I understand that at times business is business. But shouldn't the sanctioning body look out for the riders first and foremost?
Oh, and F' the AMA.
I also think (but am not 100% certain) it is the same in MotoGP and SBK as well.
The Shop
Its nothing new. Why does it have to be such a big deal?
The goal is to get a title sponsorship and have YOUR product be the only one out there.
For that matter, GoPro did exactly what they should have done. Its on DC and MXSports to make a change on the next contract. I dont fault MXSports either. They took the money they needed and in the end, it is still a business decision.
name one professional motorsport in the world that lets people film themselves with their own camera's and post the footage, the TV rights are worth far to much for anyone to let it happen,
Look at Jeff Wards rally cross car, it was wraped in fly 360 logo's, but did not run the camera, Chad could have done the same with a helmet, or with parts of the bike
Reed is a smart dude.
Pit Row
tried to shit but only farted.
so today i took a chance,
tried to fart and shit my pants.
where you think moto would be if no mxsports?
no one comes to mind that cares about the sport and riders like DC.
In days of old,
when knights were bold,
and toilets weren't invented...
they dug their hole,
and did their load,
and walked away contented.
Post a reply to: Is MX Sports "good for the sport?"