Is MX Sports "good for the sport?"

40Plus_922mx
Posts
2901
Joined
4/17/2009
Location
High Desert, CA US
Edited Date/Time 7/26/2015 3:53pm

As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship. I understand that at times business is business. But shouldn't the sanctioning body look out for the riders first and foremost?
|
newmann
Posts
24444
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
7/10/2015 10:25am
How did they deny this sponsorship again?
7/10/2015 10:26am
...did they know speedy was going to get a contract 2 or 3 yrs later...hmmm...
newmann
Posts
24444
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
7/10/2015 10:29am
And regarding them as good for the sport, as opposed to what? While I have many complaints about the thoroughly fucktarded rules regarding 2 strokes which were put in place by the lying, thieving crooks at the AMA, I personally place DC up on a pretty high pedestal.

Oh, and F' the AMA.
mxnick
Posts
812
Joined
12/4/2007
Location
Nor Cal, CA US
7/10/2015 10:31am
You also need to include Feld Supercross and Youthstream into that, as GoPro has the same agreement with all the promoters and the rules are the same across the board.

I also think (but am not 100% certain) it is the same in MotoGP and SBK as well.

The Shop

ML512
Posts
15458
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
45th
7/10/2015 10:32am
As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship...

As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship. I understand that at times business is business. But shouldn't the sanctioning body look out for the riders first and foremost?
Please do the research before pointing fingers. MX Sports didn't deny anyone a $500,000 endorsement deal, the GoPro contract is with NBC (it involves a lot more than just product, as the cameras are filming an event that NBC owns the rights to. That's why the contract is with them.)
lostboy819
Posts
11509
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Somewhere, CO US
Fantasy
1442nd
7/10/2015 10:33am Edited Date/Time 7/10/2015 10:34am
As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship...

As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship. I understand that at times business is business. But shouldn't the sanctioning body look out for the riders first and foremost?
Go Pro paid their money so they should be looked out for also.
Tpog496
Posts
1282
Joined
9/16/2014
Location
MN US
7/10/2015 10:34am Edited Date/Time 7/10/2015 10:35am
As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship...

As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship. I understand that at times business is business. But shouldn't the sanctioning body look out for the riders first and foremost?
Not just Mx sports
731chopper
Posts
4080
Joined
1/2/2015
Location
DFW, TX US
Fantasy
442nd
7/10/2015 10:34am
Without the TV package that they brought to the table would $500,000 personal camera deals even get offered?
IceMan446
Posts
4671
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA US
7/10/2015 10:34am
Toyota blocked Dodge at supercross events.

Its nothing new. Why does it have to be such a big deal?

The goal is to get a title sponsorship and have YOUR product be the only one out there.

For that matter, GoPro did exactly what they should have done. Its on DC and MXSports to make a change on the next contract. I dont fault MXSports either. They took the money they needed and in the end, it is still a business decision.
IceMan446
Posts
4671
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA US
7/10/2015 10:35am
As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship...

As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship. I understand that at times business is business. But shouldn't the sanctioning body look out for the riders first and foremost?
Tpog496 wrote:
Not just Mx sports
Not to talk shit, but Reed said his deal was worth that much for his camera.


40Plus_922mx
Posts
2901
Joined
4/17/2009
Location
High Desert, CA US
7/10/2015 10:47am
I confess I do not know everything in regards to the details. So it looks like Reed shoulda done some home work too I guess, or maybe thought he could get it to fly knowing it may not.
ML512
Posts
15458
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
45th
7/10/2015 10:49am
I confess I do not know everything in regards to the details. So it looks like Reed shoulda done some home work too I guess, or...
I confess I do not know everything in regards to the details. So it looks like Reed shoulda done some home work too I guess, or maybe thought he could get it to fly knowing it may not.
Reed did his homework, he knew going into it that he would not be allowed to run the camera.
Tpog496
Posts
1282
Joined
9/16/2014
Location
MN US
7/10/2015 11:00am
As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship...

As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship. I understand that at times business is business. But shouldn't the sanctioning body look out for the riders first and foremost?
Tpog496 wrote:
Not just Mx sports
IceMan446 wrote:
Not to talk shit, but Reed said his deal was worth that much for his camera.


Yes I remembered that and edited my post. Sorry boys!
IWreckALot
Posts
8677
Joined
3/12/2011
Location
Fort Worth, TX US
7/10/2015 11:06am
I confess I do not know everything in regards to the details. So it looks like Reed shoulda done some home work too I guess, or...
I confess I do not know everything in regards to the details. So it looks like Reed shoulda done some home work too I guess, or maybe thought he could get it to fly knowing it may not.
ML512 wrote:
Reed did his homework, he knew going into it that he would not be allowed to run the camera.
So the way it played out is the way he planned it to play out?
scott_nz
Posts
5320
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NZ
Fantasy
655th
7/10/2015 11:06am
As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship...

As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship. I understand that at times business is business. But shouldn't the sanctioning body look out for the riders first and foremost?
Reed knew, and his agents with out a doubt knew the rules regarding the camera, his blow up to make it look like he was not just quitting mid season was pure theatre, i'll give him credit where credit is due, hes got good at getting the public on his side,

name one professional motorsport in the world that lets people film themselves with their own camera's and post the footage, the TV rights are worth far to much for anyone to let it happen,

Look at Jeff Wards rally cross car, it was wraped in fly 360 logo's, but did not run the camera, Chad could have done the same with a helmet, or with parts of the bike
stillwelding
Posts
3189
Joined
1/22/2007
Location
Santa Clarita, CA US
7/10/2015 11:08am
As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship...

As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship. I understand that at times business is business. But shouldn't the sanctioning body look out for the riders first and foremost?
I hope not. It's a business, MX Sports should be looking out for MX Sports. If something "Good for the sort" happens, it's a byproduct of what's good for the business. The AMA should be good for the sort, but as far as I'm concerned, if something happens that's good for the sport, it's also a byproduct of what's good for the AMA, which is a non profit, run as a business, paid for with money supplied by it's membership.
Markopolo400
Posts
1377
Joined
7/24/2012
Location
St. Paul-ish, MN US
7/10/2015 11:08am
I confess I do not know everything in regards to the details. So it looks like Reed shoulda done some home work too I guess, or...
I confess I do not know everything in regards to the details. So it looks like Reed shoulda done some home work too I guess, or maybe thought he could get it to fly knowing it may not.
ML512 wrote:
Reed did his homework, he knew going into it that he would not be allowed to run the camera.
He even commented it on Pulp, he knew EXACTLY what he was doing. The only reason he did is to elicit a response from the industry.

Reed is a smart dude.
scott_nz
Posts
5320
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NZ
Fantasy
655th
7/10/2015 11:14am
as for the original question, yes I think MX Sports is the best promotor of motocross in the world, and the fact MX Sports Chief DC comes on here to explain, and set fans right, just proves my point IMO,
peelout
Posts
17872
Joined
1/6/2011
Location
Ogden, UT US
7/10/2015 11:40am
as i sat there broken hearted,
tried to shit but only farted.
so today i took a chance,
tried to fart and shit my pants.


hillbilly
Posts
9080
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Afton, TN US
7/10/2015 11:40am
good for the sport? They are the sport.

where you think moto would be if no mxsports?

no one comes to mind that cares about the sport and riders like DC.
Crossup
Posts
1557
Joined
12/13/2007
Location
Freetown, MA US
7/10/2015 11:58am
peelout wrote:
as i sat there broken hearted,
tried to shit but only farted.
so today i took a chance,
tried to fart and shit my pants.


Related...

In days of old,
when knights were bold,
and toilets weren't invented...
they dug their hole,
and did their load,
and walked away contented.
scott_nz
Posts
5320
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NZ
Fantasy
655th
7/10/2015 12:34pm
hillbilly wrote:
good for the sport? They are the sport. where you think moto would be if no mxsports? no one comes to mind that cares about the...
good for the sport? They are the sport.

where you think moto would be if no mxsports?

no one comes to mind that cares about the sport and riders like DC.
x 2
kongols
Posts
23996
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga LV
7/10/2015 12:37pm
kongols wrote:
Not this shit again...
hillbilly wrote:
what else you got to do?
Putting kids to bed and leaving tomorrow at 7.30 for GP of Latvia.
Cygnus
Posts
14849
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Hanover, CO US
7/10/2015 12:38pm
Two words. Beer tent.
lostboy819
Posts
11509
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Somewhere, CO US
Fantasy
1442nd
7/10/2015 12:41pm Edited Date/Time 7/10/2015 12:42pm
hillbilly wrote:
good for the sport? They are the sport. where you think moto would be if no mxsports? no one comes to mind that cares about the...
good for the sport? They are the sport.

where you think moto would be if no mxsports?

no one comes to mind that cares about the sport and riders like DC.
It would still be around and in about the same condition it is now which is in pretty good shape , MX sports does a good job but others could do a good job also. MX sports didn't save MX from devastation and has brought lots of new deals to the table so I would not be for any type of change as I think its in good hands now.
ChrisB10
Posts
2082
Joined
5/24/2014
Location
Plattsburgh, NY US
7/10/2015 12:54pm Edited Date/Time 7/10/2015 12:55pm
So fn sick of this camera BS. People keep whining about Chad and his right to make camera money well doesn't that right apply to MX sports? Shouldn't MX sports be allowed camera money? You realize that if Chad is allowed his camera it breaches the contract with gopro(that all of the riders agreed to before the season) and they would snatch their money back...... Reed is fn loaded anyways. Don't let the closing of twotwo make it seem like Reed is on food stamps. The guy gets more from Monster in a year a than most of us will make in a lifetime.
ChrisB10
Posts
2082
Joined
5/24/2014
Location
Plattsburgh, NY US
7/10/2015 1:00pm
As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship...

As I sit here putting on my flame retardant suit I am curious as to opinions in regards to them denying a rider a $500,000 sponsorship. I understand that at times business is business. But shouldn't the sanctioning body look out for the riders first and foremost?
This is moronic I'm sorry. Apparently you dont understand this is a business. The people who run MX SPORTS are not investing THEIR OWN MONEY so someone else can make money. No business on Earth does that. If both parties can profit great......but why should mx sports, who has to pay NBC Sports $ out of their own pocket to air the races, have someone else's financial interests first? It's like saying shouldn't an investor be concerned about their broker's ROI before their own......dumb dumb dumb.....

Post a reply to: Is MX Sports "good for the sport?"

The Latest