Posts
144
Joined
12/9/2013
Location
Boerne, TX
US
was chatting with a buddy the other day and somehow we ended up debating this statement:
"Guys that line up and are competitive in motocross are in probably the top 5% of motorcyclists on earth."
This does not include the squid that putts around in last place...I'm talking about those that can line up and possess the skills to be competitive. From the Friday night race to LL's...I argued that the guys that can competitively race on a dirt bike have skills that make them some of the most skilled motorcyclists on earth.
No other discipline requires the skill that motocross does, and in order to do it, you become one of the top % of guys in the world that can handle a bike like is required.
Random Monday morning discussion for you guys.
"Guys that line up and are competitive in motocross are in probably the top 5% of motorcyclists on earth."
This does not include the squid that putts around in last place...I'm talking about those that can line up and possess the skills to be competitive. From the Friday night race to LL's...I argued that the guys that can competitively race on a dirt bike have skills that make them some of the most skilled motorcyclists on earth.
No other discipline requires the skill that motocross does, and in order to do it, you become one of the top % of guys in the world that can handle a bike like is required.
Random Monday morning discussion for you guys.
I suppose that if you take the whole population of motorcycle enthusiasts and then put enduro, trail, mx, sx, and real off road guys in it...........you are still probably in the top 5%.
When you figure that the Saturday night main event SX guys are probably in the top .000000001% of the population, the rest of us fall safely within the top 5%
The Shop
I rank MotoGP riders as the cream of the crop in motorcycling. Not only because it's way more demanding and difficult than the average person understands(the classical "the tracks are always the same" statement is just as stupid as "mx riders just sit on the bike and twist the throttle") . Road Racing is way bigger, way harder to succeed in because of the larger number of people doing it compared to our sport.
Both series have amazing riders and there has been some riders who have successfully crossed over from each side.
From a purely technical perspective, I think Tomac has a better shot winning an off road race then an off road guy winning a 450 main.
75% of all motorcyclists are simply Harley guys that ride on Saturdays. That right there puts you in the top 25%. Then you add the difficulty of competitive racing and you're in the top 5%.
Don't underestimate the skills necessary. From a total body activity, motocross is about as gnarly as it gets.
If you're fast, you're fast. But just because you race C class at the local level does not put you in the top 5% of riders across the board.
Moto gp riders are extremely talented, of course. But then, it says something when Jonny rea wsbk champ, was a very good Mx racer. That can be said about a lot of the road racing guys. The skills are transferrable. I know guys, who are terrible at mx, and have moved onto road racing and have done pretty good.
The Dakar guys are hugely under rated in my opion. To be able to read the terrain and have the mental ability to stay concentrated for that long takes skill.
I'd think we would cope a lot better with a transition to road racing then a road racer would do with Mx.
I rode trials for a bit when coming off a busted femur and got buckets of respect for those guys, takes so much precision and bike skills.
plus have you been to local road race scene , its way way way way smaller than MX . Because it costs around 20 times more than MX
Pit Row
Post a reply to: Accurate statement about our skills?